Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 5, 2008 3:10 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Friday
Two arrests in Sultan homicide
Everett man's face a portrait of patriotism
Don't be a slowpoke in left lane, police say
Thursday


Plan your fun for the Fourth of July holiday
Everett caretaker arrested in theft from elderl...
If you think gas costs hurt now, just wait
Wednesday


At Russian-style bath house in Everett, clients...
Everett teen remembered as standout at school
Report on Lake Stevens Marine's death to be con...
Tuesday


Stackable houses could be a model for builders
Straighter path open for drivers on Highway 9
Everett School District chooses interim leader
Monday


Young candidate makes a bid for the Legislature
Cell-phone law tough enough? Ask New Jersey
Airline takes tour of Paine Field
Sunday


Hospitals worry as they care for more low-weigh...
Hundreds of fish tunnels need to be unclogged
In tests, racer zips to 400 mph
Saturday


Everett schools chief to make early exit
Safety warnings go out as fireworks go on sale
$1 million will buy Marysville couple a lot of ...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Legislators keep showering businesses with tax breaks

Thanks to the economic upturn, our state now has a reserve of more than $1.6 billion. This should make it easier for lawmakers to meet current obligations and make up for the cuts in public services they instituted during the recession.











But the governor and legislators are preaching caution. They are concerned about increasing costs for health care, increasing student populations and increasing needs for services as we baby boomers get older. Let's hope that our legislators are equally wary of piecemeal tax breaks because, after all, we need taxes to pay for public spending.











The problem is that it is a lot easier to get a special tax break in Olympia. Teams of lobbyists specialize in this work. They can generate a compelling reason for each and every individual tax break, but when you put them all together, the state is being robbed of public resources and holes are being shot in our tax system.











The budget passed by the Senate last week contained some new spending - $170 million, $90 million of which was for mandated caseload payments for basic education. But the Senate also gave away $46 million in special tax concessions for this year. In the next two-year budget period, these new tax breaks will balloon to more than $100 million.











The House did pass a bill sponsored by state Rep. Jim McIntire (Seattle) and a passel of both Democrats and Republicans, including Jeanne Darneille and Steve Conway of Tacoma, Skip Priest of Federal Way, John Lovick of Mill Creek, and Toby Nixon and Larry Springer of Kirkland, to require performance audits of tax preferences.











This bill will subject tax expenditures to the same type of review that the voters approved last fall for state spending. The goal is to ensure that these expenditures enhance the greater good, not just the individual advantage of particular businesses. Otherwise, we will continue to be treated to new tax exemptions for special interests.











Here's one: the Legislature is considering a bill to credit the tax on pop syrup against the business and occupation tax. The pop syrup tax was originally passed to fund the Violence Reduction and Drug Enforcement Account. The cost to the state of allowing this exemption to go through? More than $7 million this year and more than $16 million in the next biennium.











Who benefits? One company that testified for this bill was McDonald's. Yep, the same McDonald's that made $2.6 billion in net income last year, an increase of 14 percent over the year before. The same company that has more than 1,800 employees receiving Medicaid health coverage paid for by the state.











The state is spending more than $6 million to enable McDonald's to not pay health care benefits to its workers. And we want to give it a tax break? How likely is it that the tax break will translate into a drop in the price of a Big Mac or that fast food workers, whose average earnings are only $1,200 month, will get a raise?











The Legislature makes big and yet silent trade-offs with tax breaks like these. The Senate agreed to fund 5,000 additional slots for the Basic Health Plan's subsidized sliding scale health coverage for lower-income workers. That cost about $10 million. But one in 10 Washington citizens lacks health insurance, and the number is growing. Why not take back those $46 million in tax breaks and add Basic Health coverage for 20,000 more citizens?











We don't know and can't even track where the money goes from these preferential tax breaks. But we know when we fund the Basic Health Plan that we are providing health coverage for someone who can't get it from his or her employer. Which is the better choice?











Some readers will say that the gross receipts tax on business is unfair, taxing those who lose money as well as those who make money. I agree, and the way to fix it is not to provide special deals for those businesses with the best lobbyists who have access to legislators. If the Legislature were just itching to give away $46 million, it could have been spent in another way: an across-the-board 2 percent reduction in the gross receipts tax in recognition of the increased cost of fuel that all businesses have had to assume, thanks in part to the run-up in oil company profits.











But that's for another time, and another Legislature.











John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

1. Man's death a stark reminder of food allergy risks
2. Don't be a slowpoke in left lane, police say
3. Everett man's face a portrait of patriotism
4. Plan your Fourth of July fun
5. Tragic loss for all who knew Dan Sargent
6. Two arrests in Sultan homicide
7. Camano library sale an emotional, financial success
8. Boeing boosted by increased jet deliveries in 2nd quarter
9. World famous, and headed to Everett
10. World War II veteran feels 'we owe our country'
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Red, White, and Blue: Parade photoalbum
World famous, and headed to Everett
The man in charge
A lifetime of happiness
Three new administrators join SCC
Adefua opens Edmonds concert series
Changing of the guard for the Timberwolves
Lou Gehrig's has new opponent in Team Peggy
Road toward red-light cameras paved in LFP
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT