Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, JULY 5, 2009 1:08 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire
Sailors for a day: Naval Station Everett opens ...
Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

When we have resources, government should invest

Gov. Chris Gregoire had a field day last month laying out her spending priorities for the next two-year budget. She did so with good reason - she wants to invest in education, health care and economic development. But then, with the legislative session starting, the Republicans figured out some sound bites to cast a shadow on her proposals.

Let's start with their first volley. Senate Republicans said that the governor wanted to spend $6 million a day more than when she took office. Sounds big, but it isn't a fair comparison. They dug up this figure by looking at the 2003-2005 budget - a recession budget. That was when the Legislature had to cut programs because of the national economic downturn.

To compare the future budget with the recession budget is misleading. Think about having bacon for breakfast. When the family budget is tight, the bacon doesn't appear; when more income comes in, a couple strips appear on each plate. Now, with even more income coming in, the Republicans would have you believe that we should go back to no bacon!

The current state budget is the appropriate one for comparison. When you look at that budget, the governor's proposals for investments are quite modest, perhaps even disappointing.

Here are the numbers: The governor's proposed budget is $29.9 billion. The current budget is $27.3 billion. If you take into account inflation, the current budget is the equivalent of $30.3 billion. That makes the governor's proposal an actual drop in spending of close to $400 million. Then you have to take into account population growth. Washington is predicted to add 221,500 people in the next two years, a 3.5 percent increase. Put that into the calculations, and the governor's budget drops almost 5 percent per person from the current budget.

Can we afford this budget? The real question is: Can we afford not to make the investments that are in this budget? People tend to think that increases in personal income lead to less need for public expenditures, but actually the opposite is true. As personal income grows, more families have more and bigger cars. More and bigger cars means more roads, more wear and tear, and more maintenance costs. More families rightly expect that their children should have a place in the community colleges and university system, and that takes more public money. More parents expect high quality public K-12 education, and that takes more public money.

The fact is that there is a whole lot of opportunity that can be realized with state investments. The governor's opponents like to call her budget a $4 billion spending spree. But the parents of the students that she wants to help out with full-day kindergarten just want their kids to get a good start in school. It is a $20 million annual investment, and it covers about 25 percent of kindergartners. What we need next is not a lecture about a spending spree, but a way to fund full-day kindergarten for the rest of the kids who aren't in line to get it now.

If the governor has her way, students at Everett Community College, as well as all the other community colleges in the state, won't have to worry about a tuition increase over the next two years. That costs the state about $10 million in new costs a year. Would you label that a "spending spree"?

We are in a global competition for jobs and economic development. If we want to prosper, we have to have an educated and productive citizenry. That means investments now in our children's education, in community college programs that lead to good paying jobs, and in our university and college system to fuel the engine for entrepreneurial advancement and productivity increases. You don't get these things for free. They cost money.

Without government spending, we don't have government, which means we don't have public schools, community colleges and universities, we don't have emergency response systems in place when the next big earthquake or wind storm comes along, we don't have police to keep the civil peace, and we don't have universal immunizations from life-threatening diseases. So if we want these things and we have the resources (which we do), we shouldn't shirk at government spending. That is what a democratic government is all about.

John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes
2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun
3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture
4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere
5. Popular park changing hands
6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington
7. Why, governor?
8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan
10. Arlington buys up more water rights
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT