Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, JULY 5, 2009 12:59 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire
Sailors for a day: Naval Station Everett opens ...
Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Public health agencies need ample funding to protect us

"What you don't see is what you get." That's a good motto for public health. When you drink tap water, go out to a restaurant or drop off your kids at school, you are assuming a level of safety and health that doesn't just happen. It is the result of public funding for public health.

When we talk about communicable diseases, bioterrorism, West Nile virus, immunizations, safe water and disease prevention, we are talking about public health. It enables each of us individually to assume a certain level of public well-being. It is no panacea - it doesn't prevent illnesses and accidents. But without it, we can be sure that we would all be much more vulnerable to biological and environmental forces over which we as individuals have no control, such as airborne diseases, epidemics and floods.

County governments used to get almost 3 percent of the motor vehicle excise tax as a dedicated funding source for public health. But the motor vehicle excise tax was cut in 1999, and funding for public health was zeroed out, thanks to Tim Eyman, the initiative salesmanwho makes a living by undermining funding for public goods and services.

The state backfilled 90 percent of the lost funding. However, the backfill has not kept up with inflation or population growth. So now we are among the bottom 10 states in the country in public health spending, at only $81 per person.

So how long can this underfunding continue? A long time. There is no apparent crisis. But each year that goes by with a declining system of public health means that we will be that much less prepared for the next natural disaster or flu epidemic.

The Legislature recognized this in 2005 when it established a bipartisan study committee led by Rep. Shay Schual-Berke (D-Normandy Park) and joined by Sen. Rosa Franklin (D-Tacoma), Sen. Dale Brandland (R-Bellingham), and Rep. Bill Hinkle (R-Cle Elum), among others. The committee's charge was to determine the state's responsibilities for public health and figure out a way to fund this work. The committee defined public health responsibilities to include preventing the spread of communicable diseases, such as whooping cough, ensuring safe drinking water and food, preventing chronic diseases like diabetes, preparing for health emergencies, such as those caused by the wind storm we went through in December, and helping people get access to the health care they need.

The need is getting greater, as West Nile virus has spread into our state, the threat of pandemic flu increases, diabetes is increasing, and more than 600,000 people don't have health insurance in our state. The study committee unanimously recommended that the state identify $50 million of new funding for public health annually. Right now public health is in competition with education, social services and transportation when the governor and legislators divvy up the budget. It doesn't make sense to be rolling the dice every year to see how much funding is allocated to public health.

The study committee recommended that we figure out dedicated funding sources. Here are a couple ideas:

One of the greatest public-health threats is the spread of disease from other countries and states via air travel. A simple $1.50 fee on air passengers at Sea-Tac and Spokane airports would raise more than $45 million a year, providing a continual stream of funding for disease prevention.

We know that kids drink too much soda pop, and that is one of the reasons for the early onset of diabetes. A tax on soda would discourage consumption and pay for a public health campaign to reinforce that message. It shouldn't be too hard to swallow. But last year the Legislature moved in the opposite direction, approving a tax credit for pop syrup. This will result in the loss of $10 million in state revenue annually, while only encouraging kids to drink soda. We could recapture these funds, and dedicate the proceeds to public health and the control of lifestyle diseases which are making more and more of our children sick.

The development of dedicated funding sources isn't rocket science. What we need now is for the good work of the public health study committee to be taken up and taken seriously by the Legislature. We will know that has happened when the Legislature approves a dedicated funding source for the crucial umbrella of public health.

John Burbank, executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute (www.eoionline.org), writes every other Wednesday. Write to him in care of the institute at 1900 Northlake Way, Suite 237, Seattle, WA 98103. His e-mail address is john@eoionline.org.

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes
2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun
3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture
4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere
5. Popular park changing hands
6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington
7. Why, governor?
8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan
10. Arlington buys up more water rights
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT