Heraldnet.com
MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2008 10:38 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Sunday


Fighting foreclosure: How one couple got caught...
Monroe man's family remembers a life devoted to...
155-year boys club comes to an end
Saturday
How to avoid holiday thieves
Burn ban orders will have new teeth
Get a flu shot now, officials urge
Friday


A community in limbo
Ideas arise on housing sex offenders
Turnout for historic election breaks county and...
Thursday


Ways to Give: Where you can make a difference
Ways to give: Charities hit hard from both sides
County Council cuts deeply from most staff exce...
Wednesday


Cancer survivor is again living the life of a t...
Tulalip school is grieving once more
Faulty part bogs down Boeing's jet lines
Tuesday


'We are devastated' by loss of two boys, family...
A scramble to shave $1.8 million from county bu...
Arlington about to add land; buildup could follow
Monday


Arlington boys couldn't be saved from fire
Mom heeds call to serve
College degrees available in Everett
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorials   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Monday, August 13, 2007

Is it time to reinvent the 40-hour workweek?

"Wasted time at work costing companies billions," blares the headline on a recent survey.

"Workers admit wasting time," another headline reveals. Shocking. Simply shocking.

An online survey of 10,000 employees, conducted by America Online/Salary.com, reveals that the "average worker" admits to frittering away 2.09 hours per day, not counting lunch.

Just to clarify: In this case, the "average worker" the survey refers to is the average white collar worker with Internet access. Factory workers, restaurant workers, construction workers, part-time workers, etc., don't have the luxury of frittering away two hours at work. If work is slow, they are sent home.

How do white collar workers waste time? Surfing the Internet, naturally. That was the top response, followed by socializing, conducting personal business, spacing out, running errands, making phone calls, applying for jobs, and arriving late or leaving early. (Insurance workers came up the biggest time wasters in the survey, with 2.5 hours unaccounted for. Hard to imagine any down time in that crazy, go-go-go business.)

According to the report, this unproductive time adds up to $759 billion annually in salaries for which companies get no apparent benefit. Wow. That's a lot. But it's a different kind of cost, say, than the U.S. Department of Agriculture sending $1.1 billion in farm payments to more than 170,000 dead people over seven years.

What is rarely addressed in these discussions is how long an actual job takes to complete. Or how the 40-hour workweek is an arbitrary number and how it could be reinvented to better reflect reality. People are generally "full-time" workers when they work 38-40 hours a week. People almost always need full-time work in order to receive medical and other benefits.

Perhaps business leaders who are worried about that $759 billion spent on salaries of workers who admit they don't work eight hours a day could crunch the numbers, as they say, and find that a 30-hour workweek with benefits just might make sense economically for many jobs in many industries.

It would be smart and efficient, not lazy, to shorten the workweek, and make it more flexible, where feasible. With all the advances in technology, shouldn't the white collar workweek be shorter than it was 50 years ago? Do employers prefer to continue allowing employees to conduct personal business at work (the survey said they expect employees to waste an hour day, but were surprised at the self-reported two hours) or give them another day to do it outside of work?

1. Fighting foreclosure: How one couple got caught in mortgage crisis
2. Easy to steal, pricey to replace
3. 155-year boys club comes to an end
4. Monroe man's family remembers a life devoted to service
5. Future Seahawk?
6. No injuries in I-5 crash
7. Woman crossing street hit by car
8. Keep on ticking after you're dead
9. Hindus pray for peace at Bothell temple
10. Many Mexican migrants are heading home broke
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Was burglary suspect burglarized?
Food banks facing hard times
Council member resigns, heading to D.C.
Edmonds closes aid car loophole
Wildcats head to state semifinals
Thanksgiving served with an outpouring of generosity
King's takes third at 1A state tournament
School closures recommended
Raising school spirit at Shorewood
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT