Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 4, 2009 9:00 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Michelle Dunlop
Tests continue on Boeing's 787
Your town news
Mike Benbow
Business editor Mike Benbow's insights into all things business.
•Latest: State's new commerce director shares his business principles
Steve Tytler
Steve Tytler answers your questions about real estate.
•Latest: New rules create an appraisal nightmare
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
Saturday


Use of local parks spikes
Gay-friendly shift at 2 churches
Racist graffiti scrawled on cars in Everett nei...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Sunday, August 19, 2007

Economics may be tough to learn, exam results show

There is something different about economics. Test results are leading us to believe that there is something about economics itself that makes it different from other academic subjects ... and harder to teach.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress is sometimes called "The Nation's Report Card." Under its guidance, students across the country are tested on their knowledge of various subjects and the results are used to track how well they, and our schools, are doing.

The organization recently released the results for its first-ever test of how much our 12th-grade students know about economics. In all, 11,500 high school seniors from 590 public and private schools were tested, and 79 percent of them performed at what the organization called the basic level. In other words, they passed, barely. We would like to see them at the proficient level, but that may take some doing.

One thing in the test scores, though, was hard to explain and represents a real obstacle to improving performance. The high school students who had taken a regular course in economics didn't do any better on the test than students who had not received any classroom instruction on the subject.

This pattern mirrors testing results we have seen at the college level. There, though, it is even worse. College students who have taken a basic economics course generally score lower on the exam given in their senior year than students who have never attended an economics class.

Obviously, something is going wrong. In no other academic subject area do we see this kind of teaching futility where taking and passing a course leaves you, at best, no more knowledgeable about the subject than if you hadn't bothered.

What exactly that something is, though, will not be easy to figure out. It certainly isn't obvious. There were few clues in the test results, either. Most of the results from the recent National Assessment of Educational Progress exam followed the general patterns we have come to expect from nationwide academic performance tests.

In economics, as in math and science, the boys generally do better than the girls. Caucasians and Asian-Pacific Islanders do better than other racial and ethnic groups. Kids from the large urban schools did not do as well as those from the suburbs and smaller communities. And the students with parents having college educations tended to get higher scores than kids from homes where that was not the case.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress test was designed to evaluate students' knowledge in three areas: the market economy, the national economy and the international economy. They did best in the market economy area, where, for example, 72 percent of the students could "describe a benefit and a risk of leaving a full-time job to further one's education." In the national economy area, 60 percent could identify "factors that lead to an increase in the national debt." And in the international economy portion of the exam, 63 percent "determined the impact of a decrease in oil production on oil-importing countries."

These scores are not terrible, but we shouldn't mistake them for good. When more than a third of our high school seniors cannot figure out what is going to happen if oil production goes down or what kinds of things make the national debt go up, it is clear that we need to do a lot better.

But what exactly should we do? If the high school courses do not have any measurable effect on students' economic knowledge, there doesn't seem to be much point in continuing them, let alone expanding them to cover more students. There may be a clue in a piece of the data buried deep in the statistics of the NAEP report. It turns out those students who took advanced placement economics courses did very well on the exam. Of course, we would expect that because advanced placement courses are, essentially, college-level courses and the students in the exam are being tested at a high school level.

But the success of the advanced placement students on the exam suggests a clue: economics may be tougher than it looks and this may be especially true for those students who are behind in math, a chronic problem in U.S. schools. The basic concepts involved in economics are pretty straightforward, even simple, if you approach them with the kind of logic we learn from math. Without that perspective, though, the same concepts may seem unrelated and difficult to learn. Whether math deficit disorder is the source of the problem in teaching economics or not, we need to find out what's wrong and do better. Knowledge of economics is not a luxury today. It is a survival skill.

James McCusker is a Bothell economist, educator and consultant. He also writes "Business 101" monthly for the Snohomish County Business Journal.

1. Snohomish County man dies of swine flu
2. Lynnwood bank reprimanded by government
3. Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
4. Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
5. IRS joins puppy mill investigation
6. Jetty Island ready for sand castles
7. Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
8. Warriors & Patriots: Many American Indians served before getting full citizenship rights
9. Movin' out
10. Marshals seize swindler's home
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT