Editorials

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   HAVE YOUR SAY Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Send it to: E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com Mail: Letters section The Herald P.O. Box 930 Everett, WA 98206 Fax: 425-339-3458 Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).   Published: Sunday, September 30, 2007 R-67: reasonable step to encourage fairness You can't get by in today's society without insurance. Common sense requires you to buy it, and in some cases, such as driving a car in Washington, the law does. Policies represent a considerable portion of any household budget. So it's reasonable to expect that when you file a legitimate claim, your insurance company will treat you fairly and meets its obligations in a timely way. Referendum 67, which voters across the state will decide this fall, would penalize insurers that don't. We believe it's a reasonable safeguard for consumers, and should be approved. Insurance companies are fighting it hard -- in fact, they're responsible for putting it on the ballot. After the Legislature passed and the governor signed ESSB 5726 last spring, insurers launched a petition drive to force a public vote. A "yes" vote for R-67 supports keeping the new law in place; a "no" vote is to reject it. R-67 would allow a policyholder to collect up to triple damages and attorney fees from his insurance company if, in the view of a court, it unreasonably denies or delays a legitimate claim. It doesn't apply to third-party claims (a person you rear-ended, for example, can't use the provisions of R-67 to go after your insurance company) or to health insurance. The campaign has pitted insurance companies against trial attorneys, who crafted the original bill. Insurers say it's unnecessary, that current remedies are sufficient. They also say that R-67 will encourage fraud, inflated claims and frivolous lawsuits, raising their costs and forcing everyone to pay more for insurance. We suspect that passage of R-67 might put some upward pressure on rates, but mostly because insurers will be less likely to low-ball customers who file legitimate claims or try delaying decisions to encourage a favorable settlement -- practices attorneys who support the measure claim are becoming more frequent. If fraud and frivolous suits arise, insurers should fight back in court. State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler, who supports R-67, says that "if insurance companies treat their own policyholders the way they are required to be treated by law, insurance rates won't change. The only insurance companies with something to fear are those who make a practice of acting in bad faith with their own customers." Opponents also say that the legal standard for assessing triple damages -- that an insurer acted unreasonably or had "no rational basis" for denying a claim -- is too low. If potential damages were unlimited, as they are in many states, perhaps a higher standard would be appropriate. But with a firm cap on damages in place, we think it's about right. If unintended consequences do follow, lawmakers and/or the governor can seek changes. For now, passage of R-67 will simply give consumers reasonable leverage to ensure that insurance companies treat them fairly.

1. Snohomish County man dies of swine flu 2. Lynnwood bank reprimanded by government 3. Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run 4. Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington 5. IRS joins puppy mill investigation 6. Jetty Island ready for sand castles 7. Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order 8. Warriors & Patriots: Many American Indians served before getting full citizenship rights 9. Movin' out 10. Marshals seize swindler's home 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Warriors looking for balance • Three Scots vying for QB slot • Jackson looks for another title • Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer • City Council reviewing sign regulations • Wildcats get a peek at newcomers • Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode • Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt • Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge • Trading dollars for kilowatts New PUD energy conservation programs save ... • By John Wolcott SCBJ Editor • Record crowd at Paine Field’s General Aviation Day as FHC Celebrate ... • Celebration of aviation's history and future presented in multiple venue ... • The time is ripe for small businesses to take no prisoners • EPA proposal to regulate global-warming gases would be costly for small ... • Innovation helps the town of Forks to offset tough economy • Powering the people