Letters

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   HAVE YOUR SAY Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Send it to: E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com Mail: Letters section The Herald P.O. Box 930 Everett, WA 98206 Fax: 425-339-3458 Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).   Published: Thursday, November 29, 2007 FERRIES Revisit plans for a new terminal As much fun as it must be to bash the ferry system for an "irresponsible gamble by putting off the inevitable replacement of four 1927-vintage Steel Electric ferries" (Sunday editorial, "Ferry fiasco: It never should have happened") dismissing that same entity's previously proposed "new terminal capable of handling larger boats" on the west side of Whidbey Island as irrelevant to the current situation hardly makes your editorial one to admire. As you indicated, there is yet no new terminal on Whidbey Island's west side capable of handling larger ferries in the system "after six years and $5.5 million of studies," but why? Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen led the populist charge against the ferry system's plans for that new terminal, but now only gets ink quoting her analogies about the loss of the ferry route and our state highway system. The fact is, an environmentalist-driven populist charge, which Sen. Haugen only too gladly jumped on at the time, played an irresponsible game of "chicken" with the ferry system's comprehensive plans and the looming demise of the Steel Electric ferry boats. So, while your editorial has already decided that "Money earmarked for new, 144-car ferries will have to be redirected to build at least two smaller ones," perhaps we should revisit the plans for a new terminal on the west side of Whidbey Island, which could likely be built a lot sooner than special-replacement ferries for a route that comprises only 2 percent of the traffic moved by the entire state ferry system. William Burnett Oak Harbor

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes 2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun 3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture 4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere 5. Popular park changing hands 6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington 7. Why, governor? 8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras 9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan 10. Arlington buys up more water rights 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Warriors looking for balance • Three Scots vying for QB slot • Jackson looks for another title • Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer • City Council reviewing sign regulations • Wildcats get a peek at newcomers • Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode • Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt • Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge • Trading dollars for kilowatts New PUD energy conservation programs save ... • By John Wolcott SCBJ Editor • Record crowd at Paine Field’s General Aviation Day as FHC Celebrate ... • Celebration of aviation's history and future presented in multiple venue ... • The time is ripe for small businesses to take no prisoners • EPA proposal to regulate global-warming gases would be costly for small ... • Innovation helps the town of Forks to offset tough economy • Powering the people