Business

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   Related Stories • Boeing rival EADS tries to sweeten tanker deal 1/15/08 • Boeing Rival snares Saudi tanker deal 1/4/08 • Boeing challenges spill over into 2008 12/24/07   CONTACT THE HERALD Mike Benbow, Business Editor benbow@heraldnet.com   Published: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 Northrop calls its tanker less risky than Boeing’s Herald Staff EVERETT — The day after its partner EADS dangled the prospect of new jobs in front of the U.S. Air Force’s nose, Northrop Grumman outlined why the pair’s refueling tanker beats the Boeing Co.’s. “Who would have thought a year ago that this team would still be here going toe-to-toe with the competition?” Paul Meyer, a Northrop vice president, told the media Tuesday. Long considered the underdog to win the $40 billion tanker contract, Northrop-EADS says its KC-30 tanker offers both better reliability and value than Boeing’s KC-767, built in Everett. The Air Force could announce the tanker winner next month. Meanwhile, the major competitors continue to argue their cases. On Monday, EADS announced it would assemble Airbus A330 freighters in Alabama, the final assembly location of its tanker, should it and Northrop win the tanker bid. Boeing said yesterday that its 767 gets greater fuel efficiency than the A330. During a press briefing Tuesday, Nothrop’s Meyer took to task many of the benefits touted by Boeing on its Everett-built 767. Meyer disputed Boeing’s claims of tanker-building experience and risk assessment. Boeing built the KC-135 aerial refueling tankers that the Air Force intends to replace due the age of the KC-135 fleet. The agency wants 179 new tankers. The Chicago-based Boeing has emphasized its experience in tanker work as reason the Air Force should choose the KC-767. “Boeing hasn’t delivered a tanker since 1966,” Meyer said. “How many of those employees are still on the rolls today?” Meyer pointed to the problems that Boeing has hit in building tankers for the governments of Italy and Japan. Boeing has struggled with technical troubles and customer-specified certification issues on the tankers. It has not delivered the 767-based tankers to either country. Although EADS has built and flown an A330-based aircraft for the U.S. already, it lacks tanker features. An EADS-built tanker for the Royal Australian Air Force, however, uses the same boom system and is in flight test. As a result, Northrop believes its tanker carries less risk than Boeing’s. “We’re ready now,” Meyer said.

1. Everett teen remembered as standout at school 2. Machinists see little progress in Boeing contract talks 3. At Russian-style bath house in Everett, clients can wash cares away 4. Boeing labor union slogans 5. Everett dance school closing 6. Monroe prison inmates put in lockdown 7. Event planner: what to do for the Fourth 8. UPDATE: AquaSox GM says it won't happen again 9. Foster kids get break on camp fees 10. Report on Lake Stevens Marine's death to be contested 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Announcing the winners of the E-prizes • Shoreline CC tennis program gets reprieve • Snohomish County tumbles to Seattle • Meadowdale graduate leads Bellingham into title game • Sports Scene • Hoopfest champs • Sports Briefs • Know the dress code before you head out • Lillibridge gets first major league hit • Warbird¿s history keeper • (No heading) • Arlington Fly-In marks 40th anniversary this year • Paul Allen's rare Flying Heritage Collection becomes latest aviation att ... • Business Briefs - July 2008 • July 1998: Cogswell eyed future growth • 787 'powers up' all systems • Glider clubs merge at Arlington Airport