Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |


|
| • |
Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire |
| • |
Sailors for a day: Naval Station Everett opens ... |
| • |
Edmonds backs off red-light cameras |
 |
| Friday |
| • |
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington |
| • |
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run |
| • |
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
One fire rips through $2 million home, another ... |
| • |
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County |
| • |
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ... |
 |
| Wednesday |


|
| • |
Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service... |
| • |
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2... |
| • |
Honey's owners indicted by feds |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ... |
| • |
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013 |
| • |
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Disabled people will be left without a ride |
| • |
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that... |
| • |
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
1,670 local students in county are without homes |
| • |
Monroe's business gets done in secret |
| • |
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t... |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Editorials
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Sunday, January 27, 2008
Time to act on bill to curb DUI reoffenders
As the debate gets hotter over whether sobriety checkpoints should be used to get impaired drivers off the road, a less controversial and far more promising tool languishes in Olympia.
It's as if lawmakers and the governor, who has proposed roadblocks to weed out DUI offenders, were themselves asleep at the wheel. It's time for them to wake up and get behind House Bill 1340, a bipartisan measure that would establish sensible and effective standards for assessing whether DUI defendants have drug or alcohol addictions. The idea is to get them the treatment they need, reducing the chance that they'll reoffend and increasing the chance they'll live more productive lives.
Among the bill's sponsors are Republican Rep. Kirk Pearson of Monroe and Democrat Al O'Brien of Mountlake Terrace.
Currently, most attorneys representing DUI defendants recommend their clients get a required assessment before going to court, and many such screenings simply have defendants self-report their history of drug and alcohol use. Given that denial is a hallmark of addiction, it's a meaningless exercise. But it also makes sense that defense attorneys tend to steer their clients in the direction of providers who set the assessment bar lower than others.
HB 1340 would change that by standardizing DUI assessments. A defendant's word would no longer be enough. A urine screening for other drugs would be required, because research shows that more than half of drunk-driving defendants also have other drugs in their system. A criminal background history would also be provided, so patterns of addictive and/or criminal behavior can be spotted, increasing the chances of effective treatment.
The bill currently sits in the House Appropriations Committee, where it failed to progress last session over cost concerns that appear unwarranted. The state Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse estimated that urinalysis screenings would cost $25 each, but local treatment providers say the true cost is less than $10. So the bill's fiscal note -- about $150,000 a year -- looks to be more than double what it should be. Even the inflated cost didn't justify holding this bill back; the real cost certainly doesn't.
Repeat DUI offenders are an outrage, yet Pearson and others have been pushing this idea since 2003. Standardized drug and alcohol assessment for DUI defendants aren't as visible as drunk-driving roadblocks, but they could prove to be a far more effective public safety tool.
It's ridiculous to be debating sobriety checkpoints when even simple measures for getting offenders the treatment they need aren't being employed. Leaders say they want action against DUI; it's time to show it. HB 1340 should get a hearing, the governor should get behind it and the Legislature should pass it, this session.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|