Heraldnet.com
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010 8:21 pm
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Jerry Cornfield
A new state ferry is born
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: 1949 travel aid shows how few places blacks were welcome in Washington
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: PAWS calls out for critter care-givers
Latest gallery

Model Train Show
February 7. 2010 (7 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Monday


Lynnwood woman knew area's stories long before ...
Everett rethinks boutique wineries
A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood
Sunday


Marysville family comes together amid devastati...
Monroe Correctional Complex to lessen security ...
Extra patrols will be watching for drunken driv...
Saturday


Olympics are in the air
Everett police officers cleared in 2008 shootin...
Edmonds woman leaves gift of millions
Friday


Budget squeeze may close beloved Trafton school
Endgame near on airport flight debate?
Aaron Reardon laments political sparring with c...
Thursday


4-car police pileup in Everett under investigation
Edmonds educator, famous announcer dies
Bill would suspend limits on tax hikes
Wednesday


Citizenship classes: All for a better life
Many Snohomish County kids haven't had second d...
Snohomish County jail thrives under sheriff's m...
Tuesday


Mukilteo kids’ cards help Haitians
County Council increases scrutiny on Reardon
Pentagon report a good sign for Everett's Navy ...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
Prosecutor's brief arguing against motion for new trial ( PDF)
Excerpt from trial testimony about underwear ( PDF)
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Underwear test by a juror puts murder verdict in doubt

EVERETT -- The "Fruit of the Loom" defense didn't work for an accused murderer in January, but attorneys are taking another shot at it after learning a Snohomish County juror experimented with his own underwear during the trial.

In a rare move, a judge on Tuesday said she will order all 12 members of the panel back to court April 9 to get to the bottom of things by asking a few questions.

She'll then decide if any juror misconduct warrants a new trial for Daniel Jay Perez, 21.

Perez was convicted of second-degree murder for using the drawstring from his sweatpants to strangle his cellmate at the Monroe Reformatory in the Monroe Prison Complex.

Perez confessed after the body of Cory Garzina, 24, was found in their cell, saying the marks on his hands came from the drawstring.

At his January trial, Perez told a different story, saying the marks on his hands actually came from a unique suicide attempt.

Perez testified that he was afraid of two other inmates who were the killers. So he tore the elastic waistband from his underwear and used it to try to strangle himself, causing the marks on his hands.

During the trial, deputy prosecutor George Appel scoffed at Perez's story, asking if the jail-issued underwear had a waistband made of elastic or of steel cords, in order to cause the marks.

They were "Fruit of the Loom," Perez responded.

Jurors didn't buy what prosecutors called "The Fruit of the Loom" defense.

In a conversation following the verdict, the jury foreman told prosecutors that at one point during the trial, another juror talked about going home and trying to rip the waistband off from his own underwear.

From his experiment, the juror concluded that it would have been difficult for Perez to have entirely separated his underwear waistband from the rest of his drawers.

When Perez's attorneys heard about the experiment, they asked for a new trial, alleging juror misconduct.

Prosecutors argue that jurors are allowed to use knowledge within "a typical juror's general life experience," and that testing the durability of one's underwear waistband is just that.

"It is highly likely that most of the jurors were wearing underwear throughout the trial," the prosecutors wrote in their legal briefs. "Therefore, pulling on the waistband of one's underwear is simply common experience."

Public defender Caroline Mann told Judge Ellen Fair on Tuesday that there's not enough information to make a decision about what the juror did and said regarding his underwear test.

Fair agreed.

"I don't think the court has sufficient record to determine one way or the other," Fair said.



Reporter Jim Haley: 425-339-3447 or jhaley@heraldnet.com.

Other Advertisers
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT