Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Friday, April 25, 2008 Ban on mini-cities considered County Council may refuse applications for large rural developments By Jeff Switzer Herald Writer Snohomish County is heading off a proposal to build 6,000 houses near Lake Roesiger and any other similar project that would create an urban island in the county's rural areas. In a 3-2 vote this week, the County Council signaled it might soon refuse all applications for such projects, called fully contained communities, until Dec. 31, 2009. It makes no sense to allow new mini-cities in rural areas given the region's direction to reduce energy consumption and miles driven, County Council chairman Dave Somers said. "This is a timeout to relook at fully contained communities," Somers said. "They don't make any sense from a land-use planning standpoint, from a transportation planning standpoint, or from a fiscal standpoint." Such projects create urban housing deep in rural areas, but require thousands of acres of open space be preserved and the creation of new jobs along with the new housing. The Puget Sound Regional Council recently voted to "avoid" such projects. The council's direction threatens a proposal by Dave Barnett, a developer who has proposed the Falcon Ridge Planned Community. Barnett owns 3,000 acres of timberland west of Lake Roesiger where he plans a golf course, 6,000 houses, retail shops and a job center. Snohomish County is in the early stages of reviewing Barnett's housing proposal. The developer is moving ahead as planned despite the council's direction, said George Kresovich, Barnett's attorney. "We're not overly concerned," Kresovich said. "There's no reason for a minute we're not going to pursue (a fully contained community). There's no change in the marching orders. Mr. Barnett will look at whatever other options there are." Somers and Democrats Mike Cooper and Brian Sullivan voted to have the county planning commission review the proposed ban. Democrat Dave Gossett and Republican John Koster voted against the move. It's a waste of time for the planning commission to consider a moratorium on accepting applications, County Executive Aaron Reardon said. "The moratorium doesn't do anything," Reardon said. "It's nothing more than playing politics with the issue. I would encourage the council, if they desire, to begin the process of either rewriting the ordinance (allowing fully contained communities) or repealing it entirely." Somers said he plans to try to repeal the county ordinance. If the majority of the council wants to eliminate the existing code, "I'd like to have conversations and work as constructively with them as we can," Reardon said. The county opened the door for fully contained communities in 2005 after years of lobbying by Barnett and his team of the state's foremost experts on such projects. Refusing even to accept applications such as Barnett's is pointless, Kresovich said. Ultimately, the County Council has control over whether or not Barnett's project or any other fully contained community is approved, he said. Sending it to the planning commission is "in our view, an ill-thought-out, pointless waste of county resources," Kresovich said. Kresovich and others started lobbying the county in 2003 to adopt policies and development regulations for fully contained communities. Given prior approvals for policies, Kresovich said he is confident the County Council won't adopt a moratorium on applications. The county's growth plans count on fully contained communities to take in 15,000 people, Gossett and Koster argued. "If you eliminate this, you've got to figure out where these people are going to be," Koster said. To repeal fully contained communities unhinges the county's plans for population growth, Gossett said. "My district was ground zero in 2005 and I'm not willing to ram any more people into those neighborhoods," Gossett said. He called on councilmen to identify properties where zoning should be boosted to allow more homes per acre for the predicted population increase. Transportation studies for Barnett's proposal are pending, and project proponents plan to hold public meetings later this year before filing an application with the county, Kresovich said. Based on the direction at the moment, a majority of the council could repeal all the policies and regulations allowing fully contained communities in the county. That then would go to Reardon for his review. "The question is what's going to happen," Kresovich said. Reporter Jeff Switzer: 425-339-3452 or jswitzer@heraldnet.com.

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes 2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun 3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture 4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere 5. Popular park changing hands 6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington 7. Why, governor? 8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras 9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan 10. Arlington buys up more water rights 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Warriors looking for balance • Three Scots vying for QB slot • Jackson looks for another title • Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer • City Council reviewing sign regulations • Wildcats get a peek at newcomers • Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode • Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt • Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge • Trading dollars for kilowatts New PUD energy conservation programs save ... • By John Wolcott SCBJ Editor • Record crowd at Paine Field’s General Aviation Day as FHC Celebrate ... • Celebration of aviation's history and future presented in multiple venue ... • The time is ripe for small businesses to take no prisoners • EPA proposal to regulate global-warming gases would be costly for small ... • Innovation helps the town of Forks to offset tough economy • Powering the people