Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
• Rikki King, Editorial Page Intern
rking@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Wednesday |


|
| • |
Arlington private school principal charged with... |
| • |
Search continues for man lost on Glacier Peak |
| • |
Police looking for man who held up Everett phar... |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Sauk River will run its course again |
| • |
Heroin blamed in Mukilteo teen's death |
| • |
Monroe motorcyclist dies in U.S. 2 crash |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Suspects in Monroe burglary found sleeping on b... |
| • |
Sounder fills up with new riders |
| • |
Look for Camano Island actress, 16, on Broadway |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
A life interrupted |
| • |
Everett composting company ordered to track dow... |
| • |
WASL questions dominate at forum |
 |
| Saturday |


|
| • |
Marysville teen to race as Olympian for the Mar... |
| • |
Teen burglar can't run forever, police say |
| • |
New branch campus in Snohomish County doesn't a... |
 |
| Friday |


|
| • |
Vandals cause $12,000 damage at Evergreen Cemet... |
| • |
Everett's study on Paine Field air service chan... |
| • |
Two jailed suspects may be involved in dozens o... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Cheers, fears as AM radio towers rise in Snohomish |
| • |
Study backs Paine Field passenger service |
| • |
How county residents are dealing with the economy |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Opinion Columnists
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Thursday, May 15, 2008
Obama should have paid attention to West Virginia
By David Broder
WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama really didn't need a victory in West Virginia. He was already well on his way to wrapping up the Democratic nomination, and the 28 delegates at stake were not going to change that picture, no matter how that primary came out.
But he should have competed there, if only to signal his awareness of its special place in Democratic history. Forty-eight years ago, it was West Virginia more than any other state that propelled John Kennedy into the White House. And it did so in a way that Obama should have wanted to emulate.
Admittedly, I have a bias. That 1960 primary race between Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey was my introduction to presidential politics. As a new reporter at The Washington Star, I did not get to Wisconsin for the first round of the Kennedy-Humphrey battle. But I didn't miss much. Kennedy won the Catholic areas of the state, including Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha and the Fox River Valley. Humphrey dominated the Protestant farm counties from the middle of the state to the Minnesota border.
With Democratic leaders trying to gauge whether Kennedy would fall victim to the same prejudice that undercut Al Smith, the first Catholic nominee, back in 1928, Wisconsin gave no clear answer.
So the two young senators packed their bags and headed for West Virginia.
That state seemed made-to-order for Humphrey. Chronically poor, its citizens relied on New Deal programs to survive. A former Klan redoubt, many of its voters were suspicious of Catholics. The mineworkers and other unions were solidly in Humphrey's corner. The state's main powerbroker, Sen. Robert Byrd, was backing Humphrey in hopes of blocking Kennedy and opening the way for his friend Lyndon Johnson to jump into the race and capture the nomination at the Los Angeles convention.
Despite the odds, Kennedy did not hesitate. In reality, he had no choice but to tackle Humphrey in West Virginia; only by winning there could he convince the men who controlled state delegations from California to New York to give him a chance.
Kennedy had two resources he could deploy. He was rolling in money, thanks to his father's wealth, and money talked in West Virginia. The custom was that whoever was most generous would find himself "slated" by the local Democratic organizations. When I got to Beckley, the coal-mining city where the Star sent me to examine the battle on the ground, I found that the sheriff, nominally supporting Humphrey, had decided -- for unexplained reasons -- that it was not in his interest to turn out a big vote against Kennedy.
And Kennedy had lots and lots of volunteers. In Beckley, his kid brother Ted Kennedy and Ben Smith, the family friend who would later serve as interim senator between John and Ted Kennedy, were manning a headquarters overflowing with young people recruited from the local parish.
All of the energy was on the underdog Kennedy's side -- and that is what the voters responded to. As I interviewed on downtown sidewalks and country lanes, it became clear that Kennedy could pull an upset -- and he did.
I would have liked to see Obama attempt a similar feat. It would have been difficult, but he might have pulled it off. Clinton, like Humphrey, was about out of money, while Obama, like Kennedy, had plenty of cash. And Obama, like Kennedy, had more available young volunteers than he could possibly deploy.
But because he did not have to win this test, while Kennedy did, Obama played it safe and made only a token effort in West Virginia.
That was a rational, prudent decision. He has other and better opportunities to write a finish to this campaign. Next week, Kentucky may be difficult for Obama, but Oregon -- a classic yuppie state with a fondness for smart, low-key politicians -- should be easy pickings. The delegates he will win there could virtually clinch the nomination.
But, like Kennedy, Obama has questions he needs to answer.
He has sown doubts about his ability to win white, working-class votes. West Virginia could have helped put those doubts to rest. Now they will remain until the fall.
David Broder is a Washington Post columnist. His e-mail address is davidbroder@washpost.com.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|