Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 4, 2009 7:55 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
Saturday


Use of local parks spikes
Gay-friendly shift at 2 churches
Racist graffiti scrawled on cars in Everett nei...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorials   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Sunday, June 15, 2008

County shouldn't rush into land-use changes

Good land-use planning takes time, cooperation and deliberation. It tries to strike a careful balance between property rights and the overall public good, reflects our shared environmental values, and addresses the infrastructure improvements required by growth.

In Snohomish County, planning is often rushed, and thus undermined, by the annual docket process. Every year, a flurry of applications is filed for amendments to the county's 10-year comprehensive plan, seeking things like zoning changes and urban-growth boundary expansions. It has become an overwhelming burden on the County Council and county planners, who end spend countless hours and resources dealing with localized issues at the expense of big-picture planning.

Amending the 10-year comprehensive plan every year makes it anything but comprehensive. A particular case in point this year is a tug-of-war between the cities of Snohomish and Lake Stevens over a still-rural buffer that lies between them at the intersection of U.S. 2 and Highway 9. Both cities have applied to expand their urban growth areas into this "Rural Urban Transition Area," and Snohomish is working with a developer who plans to add homes and commercial buildings in a large portion of the area. The developer currently is paying for necessary environmental studies.

Lake Stevens, which points to a chronic deficit of jobs and a commercial tax base, says it needs some of the broader area for its own commercial development. In a defensive move, it has filed to expand its own urban growth boundaries to include the area, but wants the County Council to reject both cities' proposals.

That's what the council should do. Both proposals are premature, because neither city is close to outgrowing its current urban expansion areas. The county should take a step back, and work with the two cities to come up with a long-term plan for the area that's deliberative, sensible, and serves the needs of all.

An area intersected by two heavily traveled highways requires planning that carefully looks far into the future. Given rising fuel costs alone, transportation and job patterns may be poised for dramatic change. The Puget Sound Regional Council recently updated its long-range plan, Vision 2040, and it should be taken into account as this area is planned.

Rushing into a decision that commits a large portion of this area to development now would be irresponsible, and there's no justification for doing so. The council should reject any changes for now.

Further, it should put a stop to this annual land-use free-for-all. Give good planning the time and resources it needs.

1. Snohomish County man dies of swine flu
2. Lynnwood bank reprimanded by government
3. Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
4. Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
5. IRS joins puppy mill investigation
6. Jetty Island ready for sand castles
7. Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
8. Warriors & Patriots: Many American Indians served before getting full citizenship rights
9. Movin' out
10. Marshals seize swindler's home
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT