Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Wednesday |
| • |
Student hit in crosswalk to return |
| • |
81 veterans' names, 81 meaningful lives honored... |
| • |
USO singer's voice still charms them in Edmonds |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Fire destroys Emory's restaurant |
| • |
Peggy Pritchard Olson always put Edmonds first |
| • |
Camano Island burglaries spike: Is Colton back? |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Tree clearing, mud slide angers Everett neighbor |
| • |
Later start for school day unlikely in Marysville |
| • |
Hopes for Snohomish excursion train may hinge o... |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Glacier Peak freshman overcomes jitters to win ... |
| • |
Gay marriage issue can wait, say Referendum 71 ... |
| • |
Cities across south Snohomish County see tax re... |
 |
| Saturday |


|
| • |
Thousands honor slain Seattle police officer Ti... |
| • |
Suspect identified in Seattle police killing |
| • |
Mountlake Terrace thrilled by high school's fir... |
 |
| Friday |


|
| • |
Officer Timothy Brenton. Gone, but not forgotten |
| • |
Person sought in officer's killing is shot in head |
| • |
Thousands to pay respects to slain Seattle poli... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Tale of 1916 Everett Massacre retold in style o... |
| • |
Reservist survived Iraq but not his return to c... |
| • |
Swine flu suspected in infants death |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Editorials
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Sunday, June 15, 2008
County shouldn't rush into land-use changes
Good land-use planning takes time, cooperation and deliberation. It tries to strike a careful balance between property rights and the overall public good, reflects our shared environmental values, and addresses the infrastructure improvements required by growth.
In Snohomish County, planning is often rushed, and thus undermined, by the annual docket process. Every year, a flurry of applications is filed for amendments to the county's 10-year comprehensive plan, seeking things like zoning changes and urban-growth boundary expansions. It has become an overwhelming burden on the County Council and county planners, who end spend countless hours and resources dealing with localized issues at the expense of big-picture planning.
Amending the 10-year comprehensive plan every year makes it anything but comprehensive. A particular case in point this year is a tug-of-war between the cities of Snohomish and Lake Stevens over a still-rural buffer that lies between them at the intersection of U.S. 2 and Highway 9. Both cities have applied to expand their urban growth areas into this "Rural Urban Transition Area," and Snohomish is working with a developer who plans to add homes and commercial buildings in a large portion of the area. The developer currently is paying for necessary environmental studies.
Lake Stevens, which points to a chronic deficit of jobs and a commercial tax base, says it needs some of the broader area for its own commercial development. In a defensive move, it has filed to expand its own urban growth boundaries to include the area, but wants the County Council to reject both cities' proposals.
That's what the council should do. Both proposals are premature, because neither city is close to outgrowing its current urban expansion areas. The county should take a step back, and work with the two cities to come up with a long-term plan for the area that's deliberative, sensible, and serves the needs of all.
An area intersected by two heavily traveled highways requires planning that carefully looks far into the future. Given rising fuel costs alone, transportation and job patterns may be poised for dramatic change. The Puget Sound Regional Council recently updated its long-range plan, Vision 2040, and it should be taken into account as this area is planned.
Rushing into a decision that commits a large portion of this area to development now would be irresponsible, and there's no justification for doing so. The council should reject any changes for now.
Further, it should put a stop to this annual land-use free-for-all. Give good planning the time and resources it needs.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|