 |
| Dan Bates / The Herald
(click to enlarge) |
| A driver pulls up to a light as she talks on a cell phone in Everett on Monday. No law currently prohibits talking while driving, but starting July 1, drivers can be fined for talking on a hand-held phone. |
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
|
|
| |
| CONTACT THE HERALD |
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com |
| |
Published: Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Will hanging up help?
By Yoshiaki Nohara Herald Writer
In just one week, drivers will be breaking the law if they use a hand-held cell phone while traveling down the road, even though they can still eat, change a CD and sip coffee.
Everybody seems to agree that driving while talking on a cell phone is a bad combination. People are split on how safe the controversial new law will make the roads.
Cassie Kindred, 22, of Everett tries not to fiddle with her cell phone while driving. She said she believes the law is a step in the right direction.
"Ideally, everything will be solved by common sense," she said. "But some people don't have it."
The law takes effect next Tuesday, July 1. A driver who talks on a hand-held cell phone could face a fine of $124, which will not be reported to the driver's insurer. Violations will be secondary offenses. A law enforcement officer will have to stop a driver for another offense, such as speeding, before trying to enforce the cell phone law.
While the law is bringing attention to cell phones, state data shows that drivers need to focus on many other factors to stay safe. Accidents involving cell phones constitute a small portion of all the collisions investigated by the Washington State Patrol statewide.
In 2006, there were 1,244 collisions involving hand-held cell phones and 62 involving hands-free devices such as an earpiece and headset, according to the State Patrol.
Cell phones were involved in less than 1 percent of all 142,105 collisions; speeding, tailgating and failing to yield the right of way were the reasons cited in almost half of the collisions.
The trend stayed the same in 2007. Of all 141,379 collisions, the State Patrol reported only 1,114 involving hand-held cell phones and 71 involving hands-free devices.
In both years, cell phones were determined to have played a role in four fatal collisions on the state's freeways.
The State Patrol acknowledges that its numbers may be low and don't include many accidents that occur on city streets. The agency collects accident data by interviewing drivers and witnesses.
Some drivers may not admit talking on a cell phone, Trooper Keith Leary said, because they don't want to admit they are guilty.
"It will be interesting to see if the number (of collisions involving cell phones) will decrease," he said.
Lynnwood police Sgt. David Harris said it's easy to see distracted drivers chatting away on cell phones while speeding, weaving or turning without a signal.
Cell phones cause serious safety problems in urban areas such as Lynnwood, where drivers face many intersections and signals, Harris said.
"The biggest issue we have is inattention," he said.
Under the new law, drivers will still be able to talk on cell phones if they use hands-free devices such as earpieces or headsets.
Using a hands-free device is safer than hand-held cell phones, Harris said. Still, drivers could be distracted with a normal conversation.
The looming law seems to be making people buy hands-free devices.
"There's definitely an uptick in sales," said Georgia Taylor, a spokeswoman for Verizon Wireless.
Hands-free devices range in price from $19 to $199 and come in different types, Taylor said. Many drivers are choosing wireless headsets that require the driver only to tap the device once to answer and once to end phone calls
Nancy Little, 51, of Lynnwood, drives a Chrysler 300 with a speaker system connected to her cell phone. All she needs to do is push a button to activate the system and talk hands-free.
Little said the new law is appropriate.
"(A cell phone) does distract you," Little said. "I'm a nurse. I've seen people getting hurt for using cell phones."
Some are skeptical of the effectiveness of the law.
"I don't think we are going to see a huge change," said Dave Overstreet, public affairs director for AAA Washington.
Driving and cell phones make a bad combination, Overstreet said.
A study prepared by researchers from the University of Utah found that the impairment associated with a driver talking on a cell phone can be as bad as that with a drunken driver. The study also said that the level of impairment was about the same between hand-held cell phones and hands-free ones.
The study collected data from 40 people who drove a driving simulator four times: once with no distraction, another time using a hand-held cell phone, one time using a hands-free cell phone and once with a 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level after drinking vodka and orange juice.
Sen. Jean Berkey, D-Everett, said the new law will send a message that lawmakers care about safety. Berkey, who sits on the Senate Transportation Committee, was one of the sponsors of the new legislation.
"I think it's timely," Berkey said. "We tried a couple of times to make it through."
Another distraction, texting from cell phones while driving, became illegal on Jan. 1 as part of her legislation.
Rep. Barbara Bailey, R-Oak Harbor, doesn't believe the cell phone law is going to solve much. It's difficult to legislate good behavior, she said.
"How much is enough?" Bailey said. "You can certainly send a message, but are we sending a message about eating in a car?"
Reporter Yoshiaki Nohara: 425-339-3029 or ynohara@heraldnet.com.
|