Heraldnet.com
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2008 3:23 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
The cold, hard truth  August 18

Learn to raise your own meat at new Everett class  August 12

Solar energy: an ugly expense or a lovely necessity?  August 7

Green television  August 4

More on the bag debate  July 29

Archives:
LINKS:

Eat Local
Eat Wild
Get Fresh
Pacific Northwest Cheese Project
Puget Sound Fresh
Tilth Producers
Urban Hennery (Everett)

Eco Friendly
EcoConsumer
Green Everett
Green Gardening Tips
Grist

Recycling
2good2toss
Freecycle
PC Recycle
Recycle with Karen (Everett)
Snohomish County Solid Waste
RELATED ARTICLES:
Water from Stanwood-area system safe to drink again  August 18
A greener look for the Evergreen State Fairgrounds  August 18
Wenatchee fruit farm adds compost to its mix  August 18
Save a buck: Switch off the computer  August 17
Everett compost company's still causing a stink  August 16
GM says Volt's batteries are ready  August 14
3 common pesticides hurt salmon, feds say  August 14
Underground fuel tanks, some in Washington, could leak  August 13
Save a Buck: Washer rebates  August 13
Save a Buck: Learn about solar power  August 12
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Eco Geek


 
ADVERTISEMENT

 

The old plastic bag debate


Posted at 12:01 am

It wasn’t too long ago that a thick cloud of pollution drifted from China to the Pacific Northwest.

It wasn’t the first time it had happened, but the phenomenon still seemed unreal. It triggered another wave of news reports regarding China’s dangerous environmental record.

Yet for a month now, China has managed to take one major step toward green that the U.S. hasn’t yet managed to do: ban plastic shopping bags.

The ban triggered fines for stores using the bags. One shop was reportedly forced to pay $1,200 for doling out the bags.

Why is it so hard to make the change here?

We’ve all heard the arguments against plastic bags, and for re-usable cloth or durable fiber bags.

Critics of re-usable bags say they can easily become cesspools for bacteria.

Let’s assume the re-usable bags are washed frequently and protected from meat juices and bruised fruit slime.

Perhaps the real issue of plastic vs. re-usable has more to do with convenience than anything else. Who hasn’t had good intentions of dutifully bringing a cloth bag to the grocery store only to forget it? Who wants to use the gas to return home to pick it up?

One blogger recently wrote this damning treatise:

“For me it is the litmus test for material rich humans to prove that they are prepared to really do something, do anything to protect the environment.

If with our free will, without the threat of sanctions, we can’t make this one simple behavioral change, that of bringing our own bags to the shop, then quite simply we have no chance. If we cant take a step back one generation, to an age where people did, without thinking, bring their own bags shopping then how are we ever going to make the real sacrifices needed for 6 billion people and our natural systems to co-exist.

If we can’t solve this problem for ourselves then we, the spineless and spoilt, deserve what nature fires back at us.”

Some stores offer a small credit for bringing your own bag. Others don’t give shoppers bags unless asked. The tide is turning, such as in San Francisco, where lawmakers decided more than a year ago to ban plastic bags.

But as a country, we’ve got a long way to go.

Perhaps the Chinese way is the answer. Who would forget a re-usable bag when faced with a potential $1,200 fine?
READER COMMENTS
Click here to see all Eco Geek comments
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
Bans don't work....
Bag bans and taxes are being proposed all across the country and world. But in the places where they have actually been instituted (China aside - too early to tell what the result will be), they haven't worked. San Francisco's ban has done nothing to curb the city's litter woes. Ireland's much touted tax did reduce checkout bag use by 90 percent, but sales of packaged bags went up 400 percent, resulting in a net gain in bag use. Way to go!

Plastic bags are being blamed for the actions of people: littering, not recycling, etc. There is also a lot of misinformation about plastic bags. Reusable bags are great - use them if you can. But there will ALWAYS be times when you don't have your bag, or don't have enough bags, meaning there will always be a market for "single use" (in quotes because most people reuse their plastic bags) checkout bags. Get rid of plastic bags, and more paper bags are used, which are by all acounts far worse for the environment - more energy used in production, transportation, and recycling, and about 10 times the pollution generated. Look it up. Besides, those "single use" bags can be reused just as easily as your canvas one, and they take up much less room - compressed, a dozen or more easily fit in a jacket pocket - try it.

Reusable bags also aren't much good for picking up after the dog, lining trash bins and cat litter boxes, or for holding wet items. Checkout bags are good for these things, and if they aren't available, people will purchase bags for those uses.

Plastic bags are also blamed for oil consumption, but the amount going into bags is miniscule compared to what goes into your gas tank or heating oil tank. Look up the facts about this, you may be surprised.

Litter and pollution is a real problem around the world. Here in the Northwest, we have one of the highest recycling rates in the country, as well as some of the best air quality. We aren't the problem Jumping on the ban-wagon just because China did... that's crazy.

Ken Holmes | Jun 26, 2008 12:08 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
  Return to Eco Geek
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT