Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2008 3:29 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Michelle Dunlop
Boeing's too focused on short term, author says
Your town news
Steve Tytler
Steve Tytler answers your questions about real estate.
•Latest: Welcome mat out for zero-down VA loans
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Wednesday


Marysville tries to decide fate of high school
Transit use stays high as gas prices fall
Father, daughter: 2 types of heroes
Tuesday


SPEEA workers OK Boeing's contract offer
Keystone run to get new ferry by 2010
At a stalemate, lawmakers put off decision on s...
Monday


Crops attract snow geese; hunts control field-d...
County budget cuts hit courts, will affect cities
Man sold Lowe's gift cards from stolen goods, p...
Sunday


Fighting foreclosure: How one couple got caught...
Monroe man's family remembers a life devoted to...
155-year boys club comes to an end
Saturday
How to avoid holiday thieves
Burn ban orders will have new teeth
Get a flu shot now, officials urge
Friday


A community in limbo
Ideas arise on housing sex offenders
Turnout for historic election breaks county and...
Thursday


Ways to Give: Where you can make a difference
Ways to give: Charities hit hard from both sides
County Council cuts deeply from most staff exce...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Monday, July 7, 2008

Boeing tip ill considered, poorly timed

I spent a small part of the July 4 holiday doing what I suspect a lot of people in the Puget Sound area did that day. I ate some burgers and talked about Boeing's stock price.

Don't get me wrong. I own no Boeing Co. stock. It wouldn't be appropriate since I supervise The Herald's coverage and I edit the stories about the company that appear in our Business section.

While I'm at it, let me throw out another disclaimer: If I actually knew what I was talking about when it came to the stock market, I'd be retired right now, likely fishing for trout on some stream in Montana.

Instead, I'm here writing a newspaper column about my opinion, a subject upon which I am the world's foremost expert. And my opinion is that the Goldman Sachs analyst who recommended that everybody sell their Boeing stock could be way off the mark.

For those who haven't heard: Sachs analyst Richard Safran downgraded his rating for Boeing from neutral to sell.

"We expect the weak macroeconomic backdrop and record fuel prices to hurt airlines and translate to a significant slowing in the order book," he wrote in a June 25 research note.

He put a $60 price target on Boeing for the next year, saying it could go even lower.

The stock fell 5.5 percent on that day to $70.68 and continued to fall to $66.18 last Monday. That was the day the company established payouts for its incentive plan for most employees based on the stock price.

Instead of getting about $3,000 worth of stock, employees will get about an $1,800 payout, all because of the sharp decline in the stock spurred by Safran's comments. I think that's an important point.

The stock didn't drop because airlines had slowed their orders. Nothing has really changed since Safran made his comments. The stock tanked simply because Safran said it would. It closed Thursday at $64.01, just a bit above the 52-week low of $63.54.

Safran probably knows quite a bit that I don't know about stocks in general and about aerospace specifically, but I still don't get all of his arguments.

Boeing's commercial airplane business, which is only a part of what it does (it has military and space arms), seems to be doing pretty well right now.

Safran suggests that soaring fuel prices will slow new orders. That may happen in the short run as the companies try to fill up their existing planes and cut back on the number of planes they're putting in the sky. But eventually, they're going to need more fuel-efficient planes, and that's what Boeing is selling.

The companies with the most financial troubles are the U.S. airlines, and they're the ones with the fewest existing orders for new planes, so even if they cut back, it shouldn't hurt Boeing in dramatic fashion.

Safran also suggested that the 787 isn't done having problems and that they could also hurt Boeing's stock.

The company reported last week that a fuselage' was damaged during construction by a subcontractor, but all the other news about the plane has shown some improvement.

If the production improvements continue, the 787 test flight scheduled for later this year will likely be a big boon for Boeing's stock.

I don't know what's going to happen to Boeing's stock, but I don't think Safran really does either. And while I'm sure he doesn't care how his opinions might affect worker incentive pay, my opinion is that if he was going to tank the stock, he could at least have waited a few more days.

Mike Benbow: 425-339-3459; benbow@heraldnet.com.

1. Waitress tied up during Marysville robbery
2. Man sentenced in brother's slaying
3. Marysville tries to decide fate of high school
4. Father, daughter: 2 types of heroes
5. Fire destroys Monroe triplex, leaves families without homes
6. Snohomish County raises sales tax to pay for drug treatment
7. Transit use stays high as gas prices fall
8. Rockin' at holiday tree auction
9. Is teen cheating, shoplifting on the rise?
10. Abandoned school bus destroyed by fire
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Saved by a helmet
Scots aim higher in Fischer's fourth year
King's girls beat Bellevue Christian in opener
Wildcats tumble in state semifinals
Returning trio boosts Hawks' playoff hopes
Deficits loom for senior program
Edmonds to delay most drastic cuts
Neighborhood, inc.
City readies for 'green' road
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT