Heraldnet.com
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 1:28 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Michelle Dunlop
Machinists’ strike, Day 1
Your town news
Mike Benbow
Business editor Mike Benbow's insights into all things business.
•Latest: Snohomish County gains, holds manufacturing jobs
Latest gallery

Boeing Machinist Negotiations
September 4. 2008 (27 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Sunday


Job cuts shake up county workers
Everett gets tough on nuisances
'A Safe Place to Hang Out'
Saturday


Abandoned puppies ready for adoption
Composting company given deadline to trace stench
Edmonds pharmacy recalls drugs that may be expired
Friday


Speech excites local Republicans
Reardon seeks to cut 95 county positions
Bacteria linked to alfalfa sprouts sickens 9 in...
Thursday


New Glacier Peak High School dubbed 'pretty rad'
Grim task of investigating Skagit County killings
County Council says it was denied access to budget
Wednesday


On the Kitty Hawk's last watch
Reardon keeping budget secret, some county lead...
Barista flasher charged with exposure; claims r...
Tuesday


Streets around Lake Stevens risky
Mukilteo couple to watch astronaut son blast off
Windows broken at Lynnwood parking lot
Monday


Fair's been quite a ride
Local delegates ready for GOP convention
Initiative targets illegal immigrants
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Monday, July 7, 2008

Boeing tip ill considered, poorly timed

I spent a small part of the July 4 holiday doing what I suspect a lot of people in the Puget Sound area did that day. I ate some burgers and talked about Boeing's stock price.

Don't get me wrong. I own no Boeing Co. stock. It wouldn't be appropriate since I supervise The Herald's coverage and I edit the stories about the company that appear in our Business section.

While I'm at it, let me throw out another disclaimer: If I actually knew what I was talking about when it came to the stock market, I'd be retired right now, likely fishing for trout on some stream in Montana.

Instead, I'm here writing a newspaper column about my opinion, a subject upon which I am the world's foremost expert. And my opinion is that the Goldman Sachs analyst who recommended that everybody sell their Boeing stock could be way off the mark.

For those who haven't heard: Sachs analyst Richard Safran downgraded his rating for Boeing from neutral to sell.

"We expect the weak macroeconomic backdrop and record fuel prices to hurt airlines and translate to a significant slowing in the order book," he wrote in a June 25 research note.

He put a $60 price target on Boeing for the next year, saying it could go even lower.

The stock fell 5.5 percent on that day to $70.68 and continued to fall to $66.18 last Monday. That was the day the company established payouts for its incentive plan for most employees based on the stock price.

Instead of getting about $3,000 worth of stock, employees will get about an $1,800 payout, all because of the sharp decline in the stock spurred by Safran's comments. I think that's an important point.

The stock didn't drop because airlines had slowed their orders. Nothing has really changed since Safran made his comments. The stock tanked simply because Safran said it would. It closed Thursday at $64.01, just a bit above the 52-week low of $63.54.

Safran probably knows quite a bit that I don't know about stocks in general and about aerospace specifically, but I still don't get all of his arguments.

Boeing's commercial airplane business, which is only a part of what it does (it has military and space arms), seems to be doing pretty well right now.

Safran suggests that soaring fuel prices will slow new orders. That may happen in the short run as the companies try to fill up their existing planes and cut back on the number of planes they're putting in the sky. But eventually, they're going to need more fuel-efficient planes, and that's what Boeing is selling.

The companies with the most financial troubles are the U.S. airlines, and they're the ones with the fewest existing orders for new planes, so even if they cut back, it shouldn't hurt Boeing in dramatic fashion.

Safran also suggested that the 787 isn't done having problems and that they could also hurt Boeing's stock.

The company reported last week that a fuselage' was damaged during construction by a subcontractor, but all the other news about the plane has shown some improvement.

If the production improvements continue, the 787 test flight scheduled for later this year will likely be a big boon for Boeing's stock.

I don't know what's going to happen to Boeing's stock, but I don't think Safran really does either. And while I'm sure he doesn't care how his opinions might affect worker incentive pay, my opinion is that if he was going to tank the stock, he could at least have waited a few more days.

Mike Benbow: 425-339-3459; benbow@heraldnet.com.

1. Boeing Machinists dig in for long strike
2. Job cuts shake up county workers
3. Everett gets tough on nuisances
4. Unsolved murder devastated family
5. If a home is a little weird, can it be sold?
6. Filtering out facts from fluff in the election
7. 'A Safe Place to Hang Out'
8. Arlington physician recalled for his family adventures
9. Opener is big ... but not that big
10. Strikes' resolution crucial to Gregoire
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Monroe slams shaky Shorewood in opener
Ferry lane grows one-mile longer
Bringing the world to Edmonds
FEMA turns to media to improve public image
Annexation's frustrations
A run for Charlotte
Annexation's frustrations
Minimalist food bars have local flavor
E-W aims for fifth straight league title
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT