Heraldnet.com
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2008 4:58 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
The Buzz
French culture, pillow talk and rumors
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: A four-day workweek has its benefits
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Whidbey pet savior could use your vote
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Thursday


Few answers in fatal Snohomish fire
Boeing, Machinists union agree to talks
Horizon's request is no worry to Allegiant
Wednesday


10 victims of plane crash honored a year after ...
Your questions, their answers: What the candida...
State budget: Governor wants $240 million in sa...
Tuesday


Arlington fashion statement helps fight cancer
Does Countrywide owe you mortgage help?
Dog wakes man, saving both from fire in travel ...
Monday


Green thumbs in Marysville
Snohomish County schools that aren't up to stan...
Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies a...
Sunday


Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make ne...
A year after plane crash, pain still fresh for ...
The flight of the great pumpkin
Saturday


Will the bailout help?
Comcast Arena -- 5 years later
County to pay $1 million in slaying
Friday


Young couple leave Everett for worldwide trip
1 in 5 Snohomish County mobile homes could be u...
Cascade High class grades the debaters
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Nation & World   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Do you have a news tip?
newstips@heraldnet.com | 425.339.3400
 
Published: Friday, July 11, 2008

Bush taking a go-slow approach on global warming

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration has decided not to take any new steps to regulate greenhouse gas emissions before the president leaves office, despite pressure from the Supreme Court for clarity on effects of such gasses and broad accord among senior federal officials that new regulation is appropriate now.

The Environmental Protection Agency plans to announce today that it will seek months of further public comment on the threat posed by global warming to human health and welfare -- a matter that federal climate experts and international scientists have repeatedly said should be urgently addressed.

The Supreme Court, in a decision 15 months ago that startled the government, ordered the EPA to decide whether human health and welfare are being harmed by greenhouse gas pollution from cars, power plants and other sources, or to provide a good explanation for not doing so. But the administration has opted to postpone action instead, according to interviews and documents.

To defer compliance with the Supreme Court's demand, the White House has walked a tortured policy path, editing its officials' congressional testimony, refusing to read documents prepared by career employees and approved by top appointees, requesting changes in computer models to lower estimates of the benefits of curbing carbon dioxide, and pushing narrowly drafted legislation on fuel-economy standards that officials said was meant to sap public interest in wider regulatory action.

The decision to solicit further comment overrides the EPA's written recommendation from December. Officials said a few senior White House officials were unwilling to allow the EPA to state officially that global warming harms human welfare. Doing so would legally trigger sweeping regulatory requirements under the 45-year-old Clean Air Act, one of the pillars of U.S. environmental protection, and would cost utilities, automakers and others billions of dollars while also bringing economic benefits, EPA's analyses found.

"They argued that this increase in regulation should be on the next president's record," not Bush's, said a participant in the lengthy interagency debate, referring principally to officials in the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, on the White House Council on Environmental Quality, on the National Economic Council and in the Office of Management and Budget.

Several EPA officials said that throughout the process, White House officials instructed the agency to change their calculations with the aim of reducing the "social cost of carbon," a regulatory term that reflects the economic burdens stemming from greenhouse gas emissions.

Career EPA officials argued that the global benefits of reducing carbon are worth at least $40 per ton, but Bush appointees changed the final document to say the figure is just an example, not an official estimate. They prohibited the EPA from submitting a 21-page document titled "Technical Support Document on Benefits of Reducing GHG Emissions" as part of today's announcement.

"The administration didn't want to show a high-dollar value for reducing carbon," said one EPA official, adding that the administration cut dozens of pages from a draft that outlined cost-effective ways to reduce greenhouse gases.

Some officials said the administration has also minimized the benefits of tighter fuel-economy standards by assuming that oil will cost $58 a barrel in the future, compared with its current price of $141.65. While the EPA calculated in a May 30 draft that stricter standards would save U.S. society $2 trillion by 2020, officials revised that figure last month -- using the $58 estimate -- to predict that they would save only between $340 billion and $830 billion.

The proposal that the EPA will unveil today, known as an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, stands in stark contrast to the agency's original Dec. 5 finding -- backed up by a lengthy scientific analysis -- that global warming is unequivocal, that there is "compelling and robust" evidence that the emissions endanger public welfare and that the EPA administrator is "required by law" to act to protect Americans from future harm.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., chairman of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, said Thursday, "If this administration spent the same effort fighting global warming as they do editing and censoring global warming documents, the planet might not be in such dire straits."

Markey, whose staff was allowed to review the Dec. 5 EPA document but not to keep a copy, called the White House's reaction to its own experts' opinions "distressing and unjust."

1. Boeing, Machinists union agree to talks
2. Crash injures 1, blocks highway near Granite Falls
3. Meridian Yachts to shut down; hundreds to lose jobs
4. 'Opus' creator to retire from drawing comic strips
5. Supreme Court ruling clears way for Dwayne Lane's Island Crossing plans
6. Few answers in fatal Snohomish fire
7. Horizon's request is no worry to Allegiant
8. U.S. 2 trestle to be closed Friday night
9. Fixes for Lake Stevens bus policy satisfy parent
10. Vikings' Dickinson practices, doubtful for showdown with M-P
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
'Free' solution to costly problem?
King's beats Archbishop Murphy, takes over lead in Cascade Conference
One sweet training program
Who says white men can't rap?
Anonymous parent salvages snacks at school
Court move's plans raise questions
Jackson prevails in overtime thriller
Meadowdale's Moore-Taylor runs wild
Jackson breaks through late, beats Scots
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT