Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, AUGUST 30, 2008 4:31 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Renewable towns  August 29

The real green  August 27

Controversy in Eco-Land  August 25

The cold, hard truth  August 18

Learn to raise your own meat at new Everett class  August 12

Archives:
LINKS:

Eat Local
Eat Wild
Get Fresh
Pacific Northwest Cheese Project
Puget Sound Fresh
Tilth Producers
Urban Hennery (Everett)

Eco Friendly
EcoConsumer
Green Everett
Green Gardening Tips
Grist

Recycling
2good2toss
Freecycle
PC Recycle
Recycle with Karen (Everett)
Snohomish County Solid Waste
RELATED ARTICLES:
Alaska pipeline fixes on schedule  August 26
Save a buck: Get rid of old refrigerator  August 26
Asarco to pay for cleanup at Everett, other state sites  August 25
Want to sell your house as green? Best get it certified  August 24
Consumers flock to Energy Star-rated appliances   August 22
Save a Buck: Energy-efficient appliances  August 22
Small firms sticking to gas-saving steps  August 22
UW ditches plastic plates, cups, utensils  August 21
Build a better doghouse, one with a green rrrooof  August 21
Water from Stanwood-area system safe to drink again  August 18
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Eco Geek


 
ADVERTISEMENT

 

Ridiculous eco-invention alert!


Posted at 12:01 am

Sometimes I just don’t get it.

I mean, really.

A finger toothbrush as eco-item?

Several organizations are touting a toothbrush meant to fit over the end of your index finger. No handle, less waste, they say.

Upon further investigation, I discovered that the “No-Shank Toothbrush” was not originally intended as an eco item. Instead, it’s meant for prison inmates who have found ways to hide contraband inside toothbrush handles.

I have a few thoughts about this little gem:

1. Does small really always mean eco? I can just imagine an over-zealous environmentalist discovering this and thinking, “It’s not about smarts, it’s about size! Quick! Make everything as small as possible! That’ll teach that old global warming monster!” I’m just not convinced that tiny = environmentally friendly.
2. When brushing one’s teeth with one’s finger, wouldn’t one then be forced to use more water to wash one’s hands?

In the continuum of eco items and actions, does the no-shank toothbrush even rate?

Thoughts, readers?
READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click here.
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
  Return to Eco Geek
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT