Heraldnet.com
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008 8:18 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
RECENT POSTS:
Wal-Mart changes its ways  September 26

Five bucks for the future  September 24

A new gadget for biodiesel  September 22

More trouble for Kimberly-Clark  September 16

Tax breaks for hybrids!  September 9

Archives:
LINKS:

Eat Local
Eat Wild
Get Fresh
Pacific Northwest Cheese Project
Puget Sound Fresh
Tilth Producers
Urban Hennery (Everett)

Eco Friendly
EcoConsumer
Green Everett
Green Gardening Tips
Grist

Recycling
2good2toss
Freecycle
PC Recycle
Recycle with Karen (Everett)
Snohomish County Solid Waste
RELATED ARTICLES:
Milfoil to be studied as biofuel  October 6
Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make new memories  October 5
Practical living solutions touted at fair  October 4
Sundance Energy sees bright future for solar   October 2
Deal would sell 4 ferries for scrap  October 1
Greenhouse gas levels rise faster than expected  September 26
County first in state to successfully use wetland banking  September 25
Chrysler to introduce one of its four electric vehicles in 2010  September 24
Snohomish facility gets first loads of canola seed to make biodiesel  September 24
County Council hears of citizens' support for the Conservation District  September 24
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Eco Geek


 
ADVERTISEMENT

 

Ridiculous eco-invention alert!


Posted at 12:01 am

Sometimes I just don’t get it.

I mean, really.

A finger toothbrush as eco-item?

Several organizations are touting a toothbrush meant to fit over the end of your index finger. No handle, less waste, they say.

Upon further investigation, I discovered that the “No-Shank Toothbrush” was not originally intended as an eco item. Instead, it’s meant for prison inmates who have found ways to hide contraband inside toothbrush handles.

I have a few thoughts about this little gem:

1. Does small really always mean eco? I can just imagine an over-zealous environmentalist discovering this and thinking, “It’s not about smarts, it’s about size! Quick! Make everything as small as possible! That’ll teach that old global warming monster!” I’m just not convinced that tiny = environmentally friendly.
2. When brushing one’s teeth with one’s finger, wouldn’t one then be forced to use more water to wash one’s hands?

In the continuum of eco items and actions, does the no-shank toothbrush even rate?

Thoughts, readers?
READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click here.
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
  Return to Eco Geek
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT