Heraldnet.com
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 2008 10:33 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Monday


Green thumbs in Marysville
Snohomish County schools that aren't up to stan...
Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies a...
Sunday


Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make ne...
A year after plane crash, pain still fresh for ...
The flight of the great pumpkin
Saturday


Will the bailout help?
Comcast Arena -- 5 years later
County to pay $1 million in slaying
Friday


Young couple leave Everett for worldwide trip
1 in 5 Snohomish County mobile homes could be u...
Cascade High class grades the debaters
Thursday


Victims of Snohomish fire sought a fresh start
Craigslist ad linked to Brinks heist in Monroe
County financial report worsens
Wednesday


Fire too fast to save four in Snohomish
Robber may have fled by floating
Assisted suicide foes find ally in Martin Sheen
Tuesday
Congressmen Inslee, Larsen split on bailout bill
Everett man gets 26-year prison term for pimping
Gloomy picture for Snohomish County finances
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorials   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, July 16, 2008

High court gets it right: privacy is limited in jail

Inmate Desmond Modica knew his calls to his grandmother from the King County Detention Facility were being recorded. Jail officials had posted signs, and recorded warnings greeted Modica and his grandmother at the beginning of each call.

Nevertheless, the two schemed to keep Modica's wife from testifying at his trial. Modica, convicted of assaulting his wife, resisting arrest and witness tampering, later claimed those recorded conversations were private and shouldn't be allowed as evidence in court.

Last week, the state Supreme Court rightly rejected Modica's claims in a 7-2 ruling. The posted signs and recorded messages left little room for Modica's alleged expectation of privacy. Such an expectation wasn't close to reasonable -- the two were even recorded discussing being recorded. Also, by sending his wife messages through his grandmother, Modica was breaching a no-contact order. The case reeks of down-and-dirty dealings.

Both telecommunication and inmate rights are hot-button issues, especially in an era of technological advances and counterterrorism efforts. Put the two together and the legal-language wars are sure to begin. But this isn't the poster case for such robust arguments.

If inmates want to argue for telecommunication privacy rights, let them do so when they're not intimidating their domestic violence victims. Inmates have rights to private discussions with lawyers. Plot-hatching cahoots with Granny are hardly the same thing.

A fact of our criminal justice system is that those who commit crimes cede certain rights, including the right to complete privacy. Society at large needs strong electronic surveillance protection laws and we have them. Inmates have reduced privacy, and county jailhouse telephone calls fall into that area.

In most cases, Washington law requires permission from both parties before a private conversation can be legally recorded. An explicit exception exists for state correctional facilities, but not those at the county level such as the King County Detention Facility -- an awkward disjuncture. This case could be a good start to clarifying those laws.

The dissenting side in last week's ruling wrote that the state should stay out of private conversations between family members, criminal charges pending or not. But more importantly, the dissenters stressed the importance of safeguards such as limiting who can access the recordings and how long they can be kept. These issues are important to keep in mind.

Perhaps Modica and his grandmother didn't explicitly consent to the recording; rather, they ignored its legal realities. They should have read the writing that was, quite literally, on the walls.

1. Boeing, Machinists divided over 'survivor plan'
2. Snohomish County schools that aren't up to standard lose kids
3. Second Boeing strike looming? SPEEA gears up for negotiations -- updated
4. Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies at 73
5. Dog may have saved man in morning fire
6. First significant snow in North Cascades
7. Fairgoers catch toddler dropped from ride
8. Energy aid is going unclaimed despite need, PUD says
9. Turn that frown upside down
10. Will young woman from Mount Vernon become Paris Hilton's new BFF?
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
The activist wears Prada
Dale Turner YMCA grand opening makes a splash
Cedarcrest's running game, defense stop King's
Shorewood beats Glacier Peak in conference opener
Fernandez named Archbishop boys soccer coach
Team Peggy comes out in force at ALS walk
King's girls poised for threepeat in Pasco
A lifetime together in Lynnwood
The battle over Cascade's student paper
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT