Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |


|
| • |
Businesses eagerly await sailors' return |
| • |
Preservation effort divides Everett's oldest ne... |
| • |
Happy memories comfort family of injured Everet... |
 |
| Friday |


|
| • |
Life on the strike line |
| • |
Arlington boatbuilder shutting down; hundreds t... |
| • |
Boeing, Machinists likely to resume talks this ... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Few answers in fatal Snohomish fire |
| • |
Boeing, Machinists union agree to talks |
| • |
Horizon's request is no worry to Allegiant |
 |
| Wednesday |


|
| • |
10 victims of plane crash honored a year after ... |
| • |
Your questions, their answers: What the candida... |
| • |
State budget: Governor wants $240 million in sa... |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Arlington fashion statement helps fight cancer |
| • |
Does Countrywide owe you mortgage help? |
| • |
Dog wakes man, saving both from fire in travel ... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Green thumbs in Marysville |
| • |
Snohomish County schools that aren't up to stan... |
| • |
Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies a... |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make ne... |
| • |
A year after plane crash, pain still fresh for ... |
| • |
The flight of the great pumpkin |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Opinion Columnists
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Taxpayers: the lenders of last resort
By David Ignatius
WASHINGTON -- What are we taxpayers getting for our money as we bail out the geniuses who have run some of our leading financial institutions into the ground? The Treasury is extending a reported $300 billion line of credit to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but what do we receive in return?
The answer, I'm afraid, is very little -- other than relief from the imminent threat of a much worse crisis. I'm glad that a systemic meltdown has been avoided again, temporarily. But these bailouts are the equivalent of "no document" loans to borrowers who are saying in effect, "Lend me billions right now or I'll destroy the international financial system."
I wish that Treasury and Federal Reserve officials would do a better job of bargaining -- so taxpayers won't have to dig into their pockets again a few months from now to rescue yet another group of spendthrift financiers. Perhaps Congress can ask some tough questions before approving the Fannie and Freddie package.
Another chapter of this slow-motion financial crackup is probably ahead. Eugene Ludwig, former comptroller of the currency, says we're "perhaps only 30 percent to 40 percent through the trough."
Next up are the banks. All you have to do is look at the numbers: As of Monday, Wachovia's stock had fallen over the past year by 81 percent, Citigroup's by 71 percent and SunTrust's by 69 percent. And the stock of Washington Mutual, the nation's largest savings and loan, had tumbled 92 percent.
If these ailing banks should veer toward failure, do they get free access to the Fed's discount window, like Bear Stearns did? Do they get their debt guaranteed and the offer of a capital infusion, like Fannie and Freddie did? The disturbing answer is that bailouts will probably be reserved for institutions big enough to do damage, but not for those small enough that their collapse would be relatively quiet.
A new financial architecture is being built this year, but it's a jury-rigged structure with new wings added every time there's an imminent catastrophe. The financial disasters of the 1930s created a regulatory framework that helped safeguard American prosperity for 50 years. This time around, we have a pell-mell fire brigade. Treasury and the Fed hose the financial markets with liquidity every time there's a new burst of flame and, as a result, the system is beginning to get soggy.
So before this goes any further, let's think of some principles that should guide the government as it makes promises in taxpayers' names.
The starting point is that this corporate socialism (even The Wall Street Journal editorial page is calling it that) should promote fairness, transparency and market stability. Under the system that has been coming apart this year, employees and stockholders got the upside, while taxpayers got the downside. That's wrong.
Congress is already calling for more regulation, but if it's not well planned, that could just make things worse. Fannie and Freddie had their own special regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
It made lots of audits and studies over the past few years, but it didn't see many of the risks on Fannie's and Freddie's books. And when it did identify real problems, it was often rebuffed by Congress. The Sarbanes-Oxley reforms, enacted after the Enron scandal, created cumbersome paperwork but did nothing to check this crisis.
I like Ludwig's proposal for a new version of the Resolution Trust Corporation, which was created in 1989 to manage the savings and loan bailout. The RTC bought up distressed assets, creating a floor, and then resold them at prices that attracted new buyers -- so that the markets could clear. As Ludwig says, an RTC-like mechanism may be a better approach now than the ad-hoc policy the Treasury and Fed have been following.
The best reform, in the end, is to make financial managers bear more of the risk of their actions. If a lender has to keep a big slice of the "B"-rated share of mortgages it has written, there's a greater likelihood it will lend only to borrowers who can repay. If capital and margin requirements are increased for lenders and borrowers, respectively, there's less chance of the crazy leveraging that has made this crisis so severe.
The lenders of last resort -- meaning the taxpayers -- have to get fair value for our money. As financial guru Warren Buffett likes to say, "Insanity consists in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
David Ignatius is a Washington Post columnist. His e-mail address is davidignatius@washpost.com.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|