Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 4, 2009 11:47 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
Saturday


Use of local parks spikes
Gay-friendly shift at 2 churches
Racist graffiti scrawled on cars in Everett nei...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion Columnists   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Voters should be presumed to know what they're doing

Secretary of State Sam Reed should honor the wishes of the 300,000 people who petitioned to place Initiative 1029 before the Legislature next year. Instead, with the likely approval of the state attorney general, he appears ready to follow the lead of the Services Employees International Union and put it on the ballot this fall.

SEIU 775, chief backer of the initiative that seeks to boost training levels for home-care workers, wants Reed to overlook what they say is a mistake in the petitions. Although they want to have the measure treated as an initiative to the people, the petitions present it as an initiative to the Legislature.

Maybe it's a mistake by the politically sophisticated labor union. Or maybe it is, as Deborah Murphy calls it, "a blatant bait and switch" designed to mislead the voters. Murphy, spokesperson for the Community Care Coalition of Washington, which opposes I-1029, is the CEO of Aging Services of Washington. She calls the state's decision to accept the petitions a "gift to the SEIU."

It sure looks like one. In the plain language at the top of each signature sheet is this: "We, the undersigned citizens and legal voters of the State of Washington respectfully direct that this petition and the proposed measure known as Initiative Measure No. 1029 … be transmitted to the legislature … at its next ensuing regular session …"

The distinction is important. Initiatives to the Legislature are less risky. Voters understand this. Lawmakers have three options: enact the measure, propose an alternative and let voters decide, or reject (or ignore) the initiative, automatically sending it to the ballot the following November.

Representing CCCW, attorneys Kathleen Benedict and Narda Pierce wrote Reed July 2, saying, "To ignore these basic and constitutional differences in the two forms of initiative would underrate the voters … and their understanding of the options …This precedent would allow an initiative sponsor to create ambiguities about which of the two initiative processes were involved, and decide at a later date whether to argue the initiative was intended to be an initiative to the legislature or an initiative to the people."

The SEIU appears to be OK with that. Reed should not be, even though the attorney general gave him the green light Monday.

There's no need for Clintonesque parsing or to wonder what the "meaning of 'is' is." No magic words or hidden codes can change "transmitted to the legislature" to "submitted to the voters."

Reed's spokesman, Dave Ammons, told me last week that the office would prefer to "err on the side of the 300,000 people who signed the petitions." Not an unusual position for the secretary of state to take with respect to citizen initiatives.

But he misses the point: To place the initiative on the November ballot, Reed must contend that those 300,000 folks did not know what they were signing. I'll concede that voters sometimes sign petitions without adequate information. But the state's chief election officer is an unlikely proponent of the Theory of Benign Voter Ignorance.

Murphy says, sensibly, "We believe the voters knew what they were signing." To take any other position asks Reed to read minds. She finds the state's decision "baffling."

Initiative activist Tim Eyman understands the system better than most. He doubts state officials would show him the same courtesy they are showing SEIU.

Eyman says, "I see a clear double standard."

I don't. None of Eyman's initiatives has been tossed before the voters had their say. Then again, never has he submitted a petition with such a profoundly bogus assertion about its intent.

Taking what he calls "a middle of the road" position, Eyman says the secretary of state should do what the petitions require: submit the initiative to the Legislature. No need to invalidate the signatures and disqualify the initiative. Makes sense to me.

CCCW voted Monday to sue to set aside Reed's decision to place the measure on the ballot. Good for them. If the court adheres to the high standards it has set for initiatives in recent years, we won't see I-1029 on the fall ballot. And the expressed intent of the petitioners will have been honored.

It's an easy call.



Richard S. Davis writes on public policy, economics and politics. His email address is richardsdavis@gmail.com.

1. Snohomish County man dies of swine flu
2. Lynnwood bank reprimanded by government
3. Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
4. Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
5. IRS joins puppy mill investigation
6. Jetty Island ready for sand castles
7. Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
8. Warriors & Patriots: Many American Indians served before getting full citizenship rights
9. Movin' out
10. Marshals seize swindler's home
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT