Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2008 11:31 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Businesses eagerly await sailors' return
Preservation effort divides Everett's oldest ne...
Happy memories comfort family of injured Everet...
Friday


Life on the strike line
Arlington boatbuilder shutting down; hundreds t...
Boeing, Machinists likely to resume talks this ...
Thursday


Few answers in fatal Snohomish fire
Boeing, Machinists union agree to talks
Horizon's request is no worry to Allegiant
Wednesday


10 victims of plane crash honored a year after ...
Your questions, their answers: What the candida...
State budget: Governor wants $240 million in sa...
Tuesday


Arlington fashion statement helps fight cancer
Does Countrywide owe you mortgage help?
Dog wakes man, saving both from fire in travel ...
Monday


Green thumbs in Marysville
Snohomish County schools that aren't up to stan...
Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies a...
Sunday


Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make ne...
A year after plane crash, pain still fresh for ...
The flight of the great pumpkin
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion Columnists   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Bush's Iraq 'time horizon' simply more obfuscation

WASHINGTON­ ­-- It's not a "timetable" for extricating U.S troops from Iraq that George W. Bush is suddenly talking about, and heaven help anyone who accuses him of proposing a "timeline." No, the Decider says he is now amenable to a "time horizon," which apparently is a whole different kind of time thing -- not at all like the sensible course of action that Democrats and other critics of the Iraq occupation have been demanding.

If Bush were known for exquisite subtlety in his use of the language, I'd note that a horizon is, by definition, a line that can never be reached. But pigs will streak across the sky at Mach 2 before Bush displays a diabolical mastery of semantics. His new "time horizon" formulation is just smoke, intended to obfuscate and stall. In six months, Iraq becomes somebody else's problem.

The shift does put loyal supporters of Bush's Iraq policy in an untenable position, though. Their mantra has been that anyone who suggests a date for U.S. withdrawal, however vague or distant or aspirational, is being "defeatist." Now, logically, they ought to be saying the same thing about the president.

John McCain is the real victim of Bush's rhetorical moonwalk. After yoking himself to the president's stay-the-course policy and musing that U.S. troops could be in Iraq for a century, he finds himself virtually alone in advocating what is now an extremist position.

Events have conspired to make the strategy advocated by Barack Obama and other leading Democrats -- set a timetable for shutting down the sideshow in Iraq; focus attention and resources on the main event in Afghanistan -- the only sane way to proceed. For one thing, the Iraqis are making it clear that the time is coming for us to leave. In an interview published Saturday in the German magazine Der Spiegel, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki basically endorsed Obama's 16-month time frame for withdrawal.

U.S. military officials in Baghdad later released a statement from Maliki's office that claimed, without citing specifics, that the prime minister's remarks had been "mistranslated" and "not conveyed accurately."

But on Monday, after Obama met with Maliki in Baghdad, a spokesman for the prime minister said the Iraqi government's view that a "timetable" for U.S. withdrawal is now desirable. The schedule or horizon or whatever that the spokesman proposed -- U.S. troops out in 2010 -- coincides roughly with Obama's plan.

Obama spent the weekend in Afghanistan, where he found the situation "urgent." He told CBS News that Afghanistan "has to be our central focus, the central front in our battle against terrorists." More troops and materiel are needed now, he said, adding that "if we wait until the next administration, it could be a year before we get those troops on the ground."

Attacks on U.S. forces in Afghanistan have become more frequent and brazen over the past year, including a frontal assault on a forward base earlier this month that left nine Americans dead. The Taliban, far from being a spent force, is reconstituted and apparently re-energized.

Across the border in the lawless hinterlands of Pakistan, al-Qaeda is believed to have established new bases and training camps.

Gen. David Petraeus, U.S. commander in Iraq, has said he believes al-Qaeda may be de-emphasizing Iraq and shifting its focus to Afghanistan. This should come as a surprise to no one, except perhaps the man in the Oval Office. Iraq was never anything more than a windfall to al-Qaeda, an opportunity to engage and tie down the enemy -- that would be us -- while headquarters enjoyed a respite to regroup and rebuild.

The idea that al-Qaeda, whose membership consists of fanatical Sunni Muslims, would ever expect to establish a serious operational base in majority-Shiite Iraq has always been absurd. The terrorists' goal was simply to commit as much anti-American mayhem as possible, for as long as possible.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said he wants to send additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan "sooner rather than later." But that's easier said than done. Today there are more U.S. troops in Iraq than before last year's troop surge -- despite the token withdrawals that Bush has been touting.

The occupation of Iraq continues to devour resources that could and should be put to better use. The day when the real fight against al-Qaeda can be resumed has not yet arrived. But even George Bush can see it on the horizon.



Eugene Robinson is a Washington Post columnist. His e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

1. Happy memories comfort family of injured Everett woman
2. Boeing Machinists earn their $150 weekly strike check keeping the line fed, fired up
3. Businesses eagerly await sailors' return
4. Marysville-Pilchuck blitzes Lake Stevens
5. Preservation effort divides Everett's oldest neighborhood
6. Boeing Machinists: Welcome to McNerneyville
7. Will Frye start for Seahawks?
8. Washington prep football scores for Oct. 10
9. Granite Falls police catch suspect in car thefts, burglary
10. Beach shows Silvertips why they missed him
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Shorecrest upsets Meadowdale behind fine defensive effort
'Free' solution to costly problem?
King's beats Archbishop Murphy, takes over lead in Cascade Conference
One sweet training program
Who says white men can't rap?
Anonymous parent salvages snacks at school
Court move's plans raise questions
Jackson prevails in overtime thriller
Meadowdale's Moore-Taylor runs wild
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT