Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |


|
| • |
Businesses eagerly await sailors' return |
| • |
Preservation effort divides Everett's oldest ne... |
| • |
Happy memories comfort family of injured Everet... |
 |
| Friday |


|
| • |
Life on the strike line |
| • |
Arlington boatbuilder shutting down; hundreds t... |
| • |
Boeing, Machinists likely to resume talks this ... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Few answers in fatal Snohomish fire |
| • |
Boeing, Machinists union agree to talks |
| • |
Horizon's request is no worry to Allegiant |
 |
| Wednesday |


|
| • |
10 victims of plane crash honored a year after ... |
| • |
Your questions, their answers: What the candida... |
| • |
State budget: Governor wants $240 million in sa... |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Arlington fashion statement helps fight cancer |
| • |
Does Countrywide owe you mortgage help? |
| • |
Dog wakes man, saving both from fire in travel ... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Green thumbs in Marysville |
| • |
Snohomish County schools that aren't up to stan... |
| • |
Richard Larsen, longtime public servant, dies a... |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Recycling a house: Everett home goes to make ne... |
| • |
A year after plane crash, pain still fresh for ... |
| • |
The flight of the great pumpkin |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Opinion Columnists
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Bush's Iraq 'time horizon' simply more obfuscation
By Eugene Robinson
WASHINGTON -- It's not a "timetable" for extricating U.S troops from Iraq that George W. Bush is suddenly talking about, and heaven help anyone who accuses him of proposing a "timeline." No, the Decider says he is now amenable to a "time horizon," which apparently is a whole different kind of time thing -- not at all like the sensible course of action that Democrats and other critics of the Iraq occupation have been demanding.
If Bush were known for exquisite subtlety in his use of the language, I'd note that a horizon is, by definition, a line that can never be reached. But pigs will streak across the sky at Mach 2 before Bush displays a diabolical mastery of semantics. His new "time horizon" formulation is just smoke, intended to obfuscate and stall. In six months, Iraq becomes somebody else's problem.
The shift does put loyal supporters of Bush's Iraq policy in an untenable position, though. Their mantra has been that anyone who suggests a date for U.S. withdrawal, however vague or distant or aspirational, is being "defeatist." Now, logically, they ought to be saying the same thing about the president.
John McCain is the real victim of Bush's rhetorical moonwalk. After yoking himself to the president's stay-the-course policy and musing that U.S. troops could be in Iraq for a century, he finds himself virtually alone in advocating what is now an extremist position.
Events have conspired to make the strategy advocated by Barack Obama and other leading Democrats -- set a timetable for shutting down the sideshow in Iraq; focus attention and resources on the main event in Afghanistan -- the only sane way to proceed. For one thing, the Iraqis are making it clear that the time is coming for us to leave. In an interview published Saturday in the German magazine Der Spiegel, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki basically endorsed Obama's 16-month time frame for withdrawal.
U.S. military officials in Baghdad later released a statement from Maliki's office that claimed, without citing specifics, that the prime minister's remarks had been "mistranslated" and "not conveyed accurately."
But on Monday, after Obama met with Maliki in Baghdad, a spokesman for the prime minister said the Iraqi government's view that a "timetable" for U.S. withdrawal is now desirable. The schedule or horizon or whatever that the spokesman proposed -- U.S. troops out in 2010 -- coincides roughly with Obama's plan.
Obama spent the weekend in Afghanistan, where he found the situation "urgent." He told CBS News that Afghanistan "has to be our central focus, the central front in our battle against terrorists." More troops and materiel are needed now, he said, adding that "if we wait until the next administration, it could be a year before we get those troops on the ground."
Attacks on U.S. forces in Afghanistan have become more frequent and brazen over the past year, including a frontal assault on a forward base earlier this month that left nine Americans dead. The Taliban, far from being a spent force, is reconstituted and apparently re-energized.
Across the border in the lawless hinterlands of Pakistan, al-Qaeda is believed to have established new bases and training camps.
Gen. David Petraeus, U.S. commander in Iraq, has said he believes al-Qaeda may be de-emphasizing Iraq and shifting its focus to Afghanistan. This should come as a surprise to no one, except perhaps the man in the Oval Office. Iraq was never anything more than a windfall to al-Qaeda, an opportunity to engage and tie down the enemy -- that would be us -- while headquarters enjoyed a respite to regroup and rebuild.
The idea that al-Qaeda, whose membership consists of fanatical Sunni Muslims, would ever expect to establish a serious operational base in majority-Shiite Iraq has always been absurd. The terrorists' goal was simply to commit as much anti-American mayhem as possible, for as long as possible.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said he wants to send additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan "sooner rather than later." But that's easier said than done. Today there are more U.S. troops in Iraq than before last year's troop surge -- despite the token withdrawals that Bush has been touting.
The occupation of Iraq continues to devour resources that could and should be put to better use. The day when the real fight against al-Qaeda can be resumed has not yet arrived. But even George Bush can see it on the horizon.
Eugene Robinson is a Washington Post columnist. His e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|