Opinion Columnists

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   HAVE YOUR SAY Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Send it to: E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com Mail: Letters section The Herald P.O. Box 930 Everett, WA 98206 Fax: 425-339-3458 Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).   Published: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Tomatoes and Their Bad Rap By Froma Harrop "Which office do I go to to get my reputation back?" former Labor Secretary Ray Donovan famously asked after being indicted for mob-related larceny and fraud, and then acquitted of the charges. Vegetables can have the same problem -- or to be botanically correct in the case of tomatoes, fruit. For three months, the Food and Drug Administration held tomatoes as the prime suspect in a salmonella outbreak that sickened perhaps 40,000 people. Last week, the FDA declared all tomatoes safe to eat. Now lo and behold, the agency has just found a single Mexican-grown jalapeno pepper carrying the same bacteria that was causing the trouble. However, it doesn't know where the pepper got tainted. Meanwhile, where does the tomato go to get its reputation back? Though the Feds failed to find one guilty tomato, the product was all but tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. Example from a June 13 broadcast on National Public Radio: "Yesterday, the FDA admitted that the number of people sickened by salmonella-tainted tomatoes is bigger than they thought." As often happens in crime coverage, the indictment lands on page one, while the acquittal gets buried on page 18. How many consumers have heard the all-clear siren on tomatoes? So many restaurant patrons -- myself included -- carry fresh memories of being told they couldn't have a red slice on their burgers and for their own safety? An AP-Ipsos poll taken last week, just before the FDA exoneration, found that nearly half the public worried about eating tomatoes. Some respondents said they'd even thrown out produce. Such crises create losers, big and small, and even some winners. As noted, the obvious losers are the tomato growers, packers and shippers. The National Restaurant Association says the food scare cost its members at least $100 million. Still, the recent salmonella eruption has been a disappointment for plaintiffs' lawyers. One would be Seattle's Marler Clark law firm, which specializes in suing over food-borne illnesses. With several dozen clients who are "culture positive" for salmonella, the company is trying to build a case -- but against whom? As partner Bill Marler lamented to The Wall Street Journal, there's "no one to sue." The tomato panic also produced some minor winners. For Lou Dobbs, the crisis fed into two favorite themes. One was bumbling Washington bureaucrats allegedly unable to protect the middle class from food poisoning. The other was something made in Mexico causing woe for Americans. Another winner was the locavore community. Locavores believe in eating locally produced food. It's hard to pinpoint the source of the salmonella in part because the food distribution system mixes produce from all over the globe. A diner who only consumes things produced within, say a 150- mile radius, vaguely knows where it comes from. The FDA is undoubtedly a winner. After a big recall of raw tomatoes in June, the Bush administration asked Congress to expand the FDA's budget, and lawmakers are complying with the request. The question for policy makers is this: The U.S. food supply is extremely safe, and any incremental improvement in that record will be very costly. Is it worth the money? And even if you wanted to spend a lot to advance food safety, would consumer advocates like the consequences? For example, one can ensure salmonella-proof food by irradiating it, which is what they routinely do in Europe. Now ask Ralph Nader how he feels about irradiation. In this country, tomatoes are an easy culinary sell, so one expects a relatively rapid recovery of the tomato's reputation. The tomato scare of 2008 will fade into history, no doubt, but isn't it a shame that so many innocents got hurt? Froma Harrop is a Providence Journal columnist. Her e-mail address is fharrop@projo.com

1. Happy memories comfort family of injured Everett woman 2. Boeing Machinists earn their $150 weekly strike check keeping the line fed, fired up 3. Businesses eagerly await sailors' return 4. Marysville-Pilchuck blitzes Lake Stevens 5. Preservation effort divides Everett's oldest neighborhood 6. Boeing Machinists: Welcome to McNerneyville 7. Will Frye start for Seahawks? 8. Washington prep football scores for Oct. 10 9. Granite Falls police catch suspect in car thefts, burglary 10. Beach shows Silvertips why they missed him 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Shorecrest upsets Meadowdale behind fine defensive effort • 'Free' solution to costly problem? • King's beats Archbishop Murphy, takes over lead in Cascade Conference • One sweet training program • Who says white men can't rap? • Anonymous parent salvages snacks at school • Court move's plans raise questions • Jackson prevails in overtime thriller • Meadowdale's Moore-Taylor runs wild • Paine Field airline service strongly supported by 71 percent of web surv ... • Verizon launches FiOS TV in Washington State • Leisure Time Events - September 2008 • September 2008 • State needs to establish north county campus to meet growing technology ... • Future software programs may be based online • Visit two unusual Paine Field aviation museums for historic and futurist ... • Mothers launch Kids ‘N’ Clay pottery studio to provide children with cre ...