Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, AUGUST 28, 2008 11:16 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Michelle Dunlop
Will Boeing’s final offer to Machinists be enough to avert a strike?
Your town news
Mike Benbow
Business editor Mike Benbow's insights into all things business.
•Latest: What business owners need to know about ID theft
Steve Tytler
Steve Tytler answers your questions about real estate.
•Latest: Resale a concern on land with power lines
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Wednesday


Excitement for 2010 Olympics builds on both sid...
Sale of bills mocking Obama cut off at GOP fair...
WASL: Most incoming juniors pass reading, writi...
Tuesday


2-year sentence in Ecstasy drug death
Heroin took life of bright teen from Mukilteo
24 centenarians set a record for the ages
Monday


Boeing Machinists stand firm
Local delegates ready to make history at Denver...
Shorter WASL exams ahead for students in most g...
Sunday


The Tulalips' rapid rise took a lot more than luck
Rain cancels Four Tops, Temptations concert at ...
Edmonds man dies in one-car accident near Marth...
Saturday


Steer clear, police say
Leaks in Gold Bar's finances exposed in audit
Cesarean section rates climbing in Washington s...
Friday


State fair opens with style in Monroe
Everett landlord now says he won't house sex of...
Behind the scenes at the fair
Thursday


Title dreams dashed, but Little Leaguers still ...
Council approves rezone for Everett hospital
First, dog needs rescue, then her owner
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Sunday, August 3, 2008

Housing rescue plan not perfect, but fills a need

The federal government's housing rescue plan signed into law this past week contains a lot of what we might expect. Faced with a seemingly endless mortgage problem that threatens public confidence in financial institutions, they decided to throw some big-time money and the "full faith and credit" of the U.S. government into the market.

Laws are made by Congress, of course, so we should expect some compromises with reality. And in this case we get it in the form of $3.9 billion in neighborhood grants to be used to purchase and fix up abandoned homes. This provision is a triumph of hope over experience, but if we close our eyes real tight and wish real hard, maybe the idea will actually work.

The big money in this plan is in authorizing the Federal Housing Administration to refinance $300 billion worth of failing mortgages so that homeowners can retain their homes. Whether this is enough money to turn the market psychology around is hard to say, but it can't hurt.

The new law also boosts the size of mortgages that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA can purchase from lenders in areas where the cost of housing is high. The new maximum is $625,000.

From an economic policy standpoint, there are aspects of the new law that are especially interesting. It represents our first, hesitant steps toward a more realistic, but far more complex, approach to economic policy and public accountability. By introducing statistical probabilities, it could be as far-reaching as the introduction of quantum mechanics into the world of Newtonian physics.

Within the law there are emergency provisions that allow a larger line of credit to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, if needed. They each have a credit line now -- $2.25 billion each -- and the new, emergency borrowing allowance, which is unspecified as to amount, is meant to quell any doubts about these agencies' ability to meet their obligations. Emergency provisions also allow the Treasury Department to buy into either Fannie and Freddie, or both.

This is an important matter, and not just for our domestic housing and mortgage markets. Foreign governments hold nearly a trillion dollars worth of Fannie Mae bonds -- China alone holds about half of that -- and both its liquidity and capital positions are significant factors in the U.S. government's position in world financial markets.

Because this represents a financial commitment for the federal government, though, the Congressional Budget Office was asked to evaluate its cost to the taxpayers. It is a future, contingency commitment, though, so this is a matter of likely, not actual cost. It is very different from a traditional accounting problem. Probabilities have to be invoked.

The budget office eventually concluded that there was a better than 50-50 chance that the cost to the taxpayers would be zero -- that is, if the emergency authorizations were never used. They also estimated that there was a 1-in-20 chance that Fannie and Freddie would need $100 billion, which would never be seen again, but the most likely situation would cost the taxpayers $25 billion.

Contingent liabilities are a particularly salient issue in the Fannie and Freddie situation, since these financial institutions were set up by the federal government but, after receiving Congressional permission, sold stock and now operate independently. In financial markets, however, especially overseas, they still appeared to have government backing -- and now, of course, they do, thanks to worries about a deteriorating market.

Congress views its role of Fannie and Freddie's guardian as temporary even though the market may not see it the same way. The new law, though, does create the job of regulator, or nanny, for the two of them, to be vetted by the Federal Reserve and with the power to establish capital requirements for each.

The whole idea of capital requirements may require more math and probability estimates than it used to. Capital requirements in "traditional" home mortgage lending, for example, are usually quite modest. For subprime lenders, though, considerably more capital would be needed to be considered adequate. Figuring out exactly how much, of course, would require knowledge of the business, of the markets, and of statistical probabilities -- at a minimum. Welcome to 21st century risk management. It's no piece of cake.

Being a nanny to those two won't be easy, but it will at least bring some additional visibility to the federal government's risk management process, or lack thereof. We have been woefully behind in determining the risks and costs -- contingent and actual -- involved in economic policy.

The housing rescue law is neither beautiful nor perfect, and it has its critics. But it, or something like it, was needed, and needed right now. With any luck, it will help.



James McCusker is a Bothell economist, educator and consultant. He also writes a monthly column for the Snohomish County Business Journal.

1. Sale of bills mocking Obama cut off at GOP fair booth
2. Motorcyclist dies after crash on Whidbey Island
3. Rescue effort for stranded teens could take days
4. UPS uses USPS, so should you
5. Tribal casinos switching to Vegas-style slots
6. Boeing sweetens contract offer for Machinists
7. Rescuers searching for boys lost on Three Fingers overnight
8. Lynnwood teen serial burglar pleads guilty
9. Short week tough on depleted Seahawks
10. Excitement for 2010 Olympics builds on both sides of border
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Rain City Rotary earns provisional club status
Something they will never forget
County health programs may face deep cuts in '08-'09
Donations down as need grows
Live & loud in Lynnwood
Mixed martial arts card draws a crowd
Snohomish County drops final NWFL game
Facing the jump to middle school
Flying the nest
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT