Business

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Mike Benbow, Business Editor benbow@heraldnet.com   Published: Sunday, August 31, 2008 Why you shouldn't let home buyers move in too soon By Steve Tytler, Herald Columnist Question: We are confused about the technicalities involved in closing the sale of our house. We went to closing and signed all the papers this week, but we would not let the buyers move their possessions into the house until the recording date. When does the seller's responsibility end and the buyer's responsibility start? On the signing date, the recording date or when the check has cleared the bank? It sounds like move-in should happen when the buyer's legal responsibility for insurance, etc. starts. Also, when does my legal responsibility end? I'm worried about my liability in case of a fire, for example. -- L.T., Everett Answer: Many home sellers are confused about the closing date on the sale of their home, because term closing is often misused -- even by real estate agents who should know better. Many people call it going to closing when they go to the escrow company and sign the final papers to transfer ownership of their home to the buyers. Actually, that is the signing date, and it can occur days or even a week or more before the final closing date. That's because the most mortgage lenders want to review the loan documents after signing to make sure everything was prepared and signed properly. Once the loan funding package has been reviewed and approved, the lender gives the escrow company an OK to record the deed and release the funds to the seller. The closing date is the day that the documents are recorded at the county courthouse to transfer legal title of the property from the seller to the buyer and the seller receives the money from the buyer. In your letter, you referred to the recording date, which is actually the same thing. You are smart not to let the buyers move into the house until the deed has been recorded. The seller's responsibility for the property ends on the closing date, not on the signing date. As I said above, signing is just the first step in the closing process. The property does not legally belong to the buyer until the closing date when the deed is recorded and title is transferred into the buyer's name. Up until that time, the seller has a responsibility to maintain the property in the condition that it was in when the buyer originally offered to purchase it. For example, if you canceled your homeowner's insurance policy as soon as you signed the closing papers and your house burned to the ground prior to the closing date, it would be your responsibility. The buyer would not have to close on the deal and take title to a pile of ashes, even if they had already signed the closing papers prior to the closing date. Likewise, if you let the buyers move into the house after signing but prior to the closing date and they started a fire that burned down your house, it would be your loss because you would still be the legal owner of the house. That is exactly why real estate agents generally recommend that the buyers should not be allowed to move in until the deal has closed. There are just too many things that can go wrong, and anyone who has spent any time working in real estate knows that Murphy's Law is alive and well. So you are absolutely right when you say that the buyer's should not be allowed to move in until their legal responsibilities begin. Otherwise, you are putting yourself at risk with no reward. Now, having said all of this, I know that in the real world stuff happens and real estate purchase deals don't always close exactly on the scheduled closing date. For example, at my mortgage company we've seen a couple of cases this year where the sellers allowed the buyers to move into the home a few days before the closing date in order to accommodate moving schedules, etc. In those cases, the buyers paid rent to the seller for the number of days they spent in the house prior to closing, and the sellers made sure that their insurance covered any potential damage to the property that may be caused by the buyers while they were renting the property. As I said above, allowing home buyers to move in before closing is risky for the sellers, but in both cases that we were involved in, the sellers were assured that the loan would close within a few days after the buyers moved into the property so it was a short-term risk. The flip side of this issue is that in some cases, the purchase and sale agreement gives the buyers possession of the home on the "closing date plus three days." The three-day grace period gives the sellers time to move out of house. During this three-day period, the sellers become tenants of the new owners. If they were to accidentally burn the house down during this period, it would be the new owners (the buyers) who would suffer the loss, not the sellers. However, the house would be covered by the buyers' homeowners insurance policy at that time. My motto in real estate is, "hope for the best, but plan for the worst." Ideally, the sellers would move out of the house and the buyers would move in on the closing date. That way, there would be no overlapping period of property ownership rights and responsibilities. But realistically, moving dates often have to be juggled to accommodate weekends and work schedules. Seller rent-backs and early move-ins by homebuyers are sometimes unavoidable. Just be sure that all parties understand what is at stake and take appropriate measures (such as extending insurance coverage for a few extra days) to protect your interests. Mail your real estate questions to Steve Tytler, The Herald, P.O. Box, Everett, WA 98206, or e-mail him at economy@heraldnet.com.

1. Girl's death in car crash stuns Granite Falls 2. 787 starts ‘final gantlet' of tests before first flight 3. Inmates to help families of police 4. Lewd baristas face stricter rules 5. Swine flu shots to be available to all in county 6. Woman who died in fire named 7. Roe picked as interim prosecutor 8. Gregoire's budget offers no easy way out of deficit 9. Payout of $44.7 million to clean up Asarco contamination in Everett 10. Roche Harbor's second derby a big hit 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Zambian woman thanks students for their help • Food banks see rise in use • ‘Making Spirits Bright’ in Edmonds • Wolfpack takes aim at state • Seahawks help students smile • 95 and still volunteering • Sno-King joined by local TV king • Veterans back for Wildcats • Lynnwood seeks to plug $2 million budget gap • Snohomish County offers the best and most affordable venues for conferen ... • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed