Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Saturday, September 6, 2008 Care worker initiative approved for ballot By Jerry Cornfield Herald Writer OLYMPIA -- An initiative to increase training and testing of long-term care workers will appear on the November ballot, the state Supreme Court decided Friday. A majority of justices rejected a request to keep Initiative 1029 off the ballot because of a mistake in the wording of the petitions circulated to qualify the measure for the ballot. "We applaud the court's decision to uphold the secretary of state's decision to put this before the voters to see if the citizens of Washington want safe, quality care for seniors," said Jeff Parsons, spokesman for the Yes on Initiative 1029 campaign. The measure pushed by the powerful voice of health care workers, Service Employees International Union Local 775, would require most long-term care workers hired after Jan. 1, 2010, to undergo 75 hours of training. The current standard is 34 hours. It also would require workers to obtain certification and undergo background checks. Opponents pointed out that wording on the measure's petitions describe it as an initiative to the Legislature and thus it should be given to lawmakers in January to consider enacting. Proponents said that wording was a mistake and they always intended for it to be an initiative to the people to get onto the ballot. Secretary of State Sam Reed, after consulting with the attorney general's office, agreed to let it go forward. In a hearing before the Supreme Court on Thursday, Narda Pierce, attorney for the Community Care Coalition of Washington, argued the court should uphold the integrity of the state law spelling out the differences between the two types of initiative. Justices were expected to reach a conclusion quickly to prevent any delay in the preparation of ballots for the Nov. 4 general election. They will not issue a full written decision for several weeks. "Obviously we were surprised by the decision but we don't know what the legal reasoning for it was," said Kathy Benedict, another attorney representing opponents. "We're going to have to wait to read what the court's decision is to see." Reporter Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623 or jcornfield@heraldnet.com. READER COMMENTS Be the first to comment. You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet. To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click here. Log out

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes 2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun 3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture 4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere 5. Popular park changing hands 6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington 7. Why, governor? 8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras 9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan 10. Arlington buys up more water rights 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Warriors looking for balance • Three Scots vying for QB slot • Jackson looks for another title • Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer • City Council reviewing sign regulations • Wildcats get a peek at newcomers • Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode • Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt • Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge • Trading dollars for kilowatts New PUD energy conservation programs save ... • By John Wolcott SCBJ Editor • Record crowd at Paine Field’s General Aviation Day as FHC Celebrate ... • Celebration of aviation's history and future presented in multiple venue ... • The time is ripe for small businesses to take no prisoners • EPA proposal to regulate global-warming gases would be costly for small ... • Innovation helps the town of Forks to offset tough economy • Powering the people