Business

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Mike Benbow, Business Editor benbow@heraldnet.com   Published: Sunday, November 30, 2008 Vacation rentals can carry complex tax rules By Steve Tytler Real estate columnist Question: We are thinking about buying a vacation home next spring. We want to rent it out part of the time to help cover the expenses. What are the tax rules affecting renting out a summer home? I.B., Everett Answer: Your purchase decision should be based primarily on your anticipated recreational use of the property, not on the tax deductions or investment return you hope to get. As I have explained in previous columns, recreational property values are highly volatile, rising rapidly when the economy is good and plummeting when the market goes soft. Renting it out to help cover your operating expenses makes sense, but don't expect to make a profit doing that. I am not an accountant, but I can give you some basic information on the tax rules regarding renting out vacation property. The income tax consequences of vacation home ownership are even more complicated. Your tax treatment depends on how many days you personally use the property. There are four basic categories of personal use: 1. If you own the vacation home primarily for your personal use and rent it out less than 15 days per year, the rental income from those few days does not have to be reported to the IRS as taxable income. The bad news is that you can't deduct any expenses related to the rental use of the property. However, because a vacation property is considered a second home (assuming you have only one), you can deduct the mortgage interest and property tax expenses on your federal income tax return, just as you do for your primary residence. 2. If you don't personally use the vacation home at all and hold it strictly for investment, all rental income and expenses are reported on Schedule E of your income tax return just as you would for any other kind of rental property. In addition to the mortgage interest and property taxes, you would be able to deduct insurance, utilities, repairs, maintenance and noncash depreciation. In most cases, this results in a loss for income tax purposes. Based on your question, this category would not apply in your situation. 3. It gets more complicated when you start mixing personal and rental use of a vacation home. If the home is rented more than 15 days per year and you personally use it less than 15 days per year (or 10 percent of the rental days, whichever is more), that is not considered personal use. For example, if the house were rented 10 months out of the year, that's 300 rental days, which means you could spend up to 30 days per year (10 percent of the rental days) in the house without it being considered personal use. The vacation home would be treated as a rental property and you could claim all of the usual rental property deductions. However, IRS regulations require that you have a profit motive, which means you must make a profit at least three of every five years in order to claim all the rental property deductions. 4. If the vacation home is rented more than 15 days per year and your annual personal use is more than 15 days (or 10 percent of the rental days) that is considered personal use and you are not allowed to claim a tax loss on the property. All rental income must be reported on your income tax return, but expense deductions are limited to the total amount of rent collected. The IRS has a specific order for deducting expenses under this scenario. You can write off all of your mortgage interest and property taxes. Then, if the amount of rent collected exceeds the total amount of interest and taxes paid, the additional rental income can be used to offset operating expenses. If there is still more rental income left over, you can claim the depreciation deduction up to the amount of remaining rental income. For example, let's say you fit the vacation home rental/personal use ratio in category No. 4 above. We'll assume you pay $12,000 per year in mortgage interest and $1,500 per year in property taxes on the home. Rental operating expenses total $3,600 per year, and the full depreciation deduction (if allowed) would be $3,600 per year. That's a total cash outlay of $17,100 per year, plus $3,600 in noncash depreciation for a grand total of $20,700. In this example, you would have to receive at least $20,700 per year in rental income on your vacation home in order to claim the maximum allowable tax deductions. If you took in only $17,100 per year, you could write off all of your cash expenditures, but you would not have enough rental income to claim the depreciation deduction. If you took in only $12,000 in rental income per year on your vacation home, you could write off only your mortgage interest as a rental expense. However, you would still be allowed to write-off the property taxes on the vacation home; you would just have to treat the taxes as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of your income tax return rather than as a rental property deduction on Schedule E. The mortgage interest and property taxes on a vacation home are always tax-deductible, whether it is rented or not. Sound complicated? I told you it was. Believe it or not, I actually simplified the example above. Accountants will tell you that it really gets interesting when you start trying to allocate costs between rental expenses and personal use when there is not enough rental income to offset all expenditures. The basic rule is that you are not allowed to create a tax loss if you are using the vacation home for personal use a substantial portion of the time. Please consult an accountant for detailed information. This column is for informational purposes only and should not be used for tax planning without seeking professional advice. Mail your real estate questions to Steve Tytler, The Herald, P.O. Box, Everett, WA 98206, or e-mail him at economy@heraldnet. READER COMMENTS Be the first to comment. You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet. To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click here. Log out

1. Lawsuit blames county and weed inspector in man’s death 2. Cost of dispute falls on Monroe 3. Salish Sea: Huge body of water now has common name 4. Mind if I smoke? 5. Boeing says 787 fixes are done 6. Worker dies after falling 4 stories from Lynnwood building 7. FOOTBALL FORECAST: Battle of unbeatens highlights first week of state-playoff action 8. Granite Falls-area fire chief placed on paid leave 9. Everett dentist travels world to help 10. Benefit to help injured soldier, his family 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Memorial for Peggy Pritchard Olson set • Bazaar Fever • Hawks proud of historic season • Olson always put Edmonds first • Honoring student veterans • ‘Wheedle' author comes to Lynnwood bookshop • Mavs build early lead en route to easy win • Prep football games of the week (state playoffs) • Tears of laughter, tears of grief • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million