Heraldnet.com
SATURDAY, JULY 4, 2009 10:57 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Michelle Dunlop
Tests continue on Boeing's 787
Your town news
Mike Benbow
Business editor Mike Benbow's insights into all things business.
•Latest: State's new commerce director shares his business principles
Steve Tytler
Steve Tytler answers your questions about real estate.
•Latest: New rules create an appraisal nightmare
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
Saturday


Use of local parks spikes
Gay-friendly shift at 2 churches
Racist graffiti scrawled on cars in Everett nei...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Sunday, November 30, 2008

Treasury may be in over its head

Until 1967, the U. S. Coast Guard was part of the Treasury Department. It's time to bring it back home. Right now the Treasury could really use some people who know something about rescues.

It's not easy for Treasury to explain its rescue operations. Each week there seems to be a new, and bigger, rescue under way. During Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's most recent testimony before Congress it was clear that the legislators were not happy with his responses to their questions. He seemed more than a little vague about what exactly he planned to do with the remaining hundreds of billions that he was authorized to spend on rescues.

Members of Congress were even less satisfied with his focus on banks and financial institutions. They questioned what the Bush administration was doing to help individual American homeowners, especially those in trouble. And they clearly were more comfortable with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairwoman Sheila Blair's plan to rescue homeowners facing foreclosure.

For a short while, it looked like we might be seeing the first signs of an economic policy discussion, something that we have sorely missed. Congress and the administration seemed to be considering two different approaches to fixing the economy: top-down versus bottom-up. Do we help banks or help individuals?

As it turned out, the discussion of the merits of top down versus bottom-up economic policies had to be postponed. It became apparent that the billions of dollars already injected into the banks weren't enough. Citigroup, one of the country's largest banks, was in the emergency room needing a transfusion and the banking system was again showing signs of hypothermia.

Undoubtedly, both Paulson and Blair were aware of Citigroup's deteriorating situation during their Congressional testimony but did not wish to discuss it during a televised hearing. No wonder Paulson was shuffling around enough to qualify him for an advanced placement slot on "Dancing with the Stars."

On Nov. 24, the Treasury Department announced that it had decided to inject another $20 billion into Citigroup in exchange for preferred stock. It also said that it would guarantee $306 billion worth of Citigroup's mortgage-backed loans and other similar assets. The FDIC, for its part, has announced that it will guarantee $1.4 trillion -- yes, "trillion" -- of U.S. bank debt -- essentially inter-bank lending -- so it, too, is engaged in top-down efforts to get the financial system working again.

By some calculations, the federal government has committed more than $7 trillion to contain the damage to our financial system and get the economy rolling again. This is a large number by any standard, and we should give some consideration to what it represents, what the real costs are, and what our other options might be.

The Treasury has now spent $45 billion on Citigroup preferred stock, for example, but that only becomes a cost if the stock price goes down. Otherwise it is simply a swap of one asset, cash, for another, stock. In the same way, the FDIC guarantee extended to inter-bank lending will only become a cost if a bank fails and doesn't pay back the money it borrowed.

Virtually all of the other commitments by the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC are either similar transactions -- exchanging one asset for another -- or loan guarantees. The federal government, in effect, is co-signing most of the banking system's liabilities. It is a huge extension of credit, certainly, but it is not yet a cost. In fact, the federal government has spent very little thus far on bailouts and rescues.

Some costs will actually be real. Part of the Citigroup rescue, for example, involves "fencing in" (Treasury's term) Citigroup's troubled assets and promising to absorb 90 percent of any losses. While that was done to reinforce Citigroup's credibility in financial markets, it will almost certainly produce some losses, although nowhere near $7 trillion.

The idea of trillions of dollars in losses would become real only if you really believe apocalyptic scenarios where we and everyone else are being transported to our destination in a hand basket. As much fun as these dire speculations are, though, it would seem reasonable to assume that under those conditions tabulating the accounting cost of these federal programs would not be our biggest concern.

The Treasury has no experience in managing diverse and demanding rescue programs and sometimes it shows. The Coast Guard is used to it. It even has experience in rescuing some people who really don't deserve it, something that Treasury is new to.

Putting the Treasury and the Coast Guard back together seems like a good fit. The rescues are a long way from over and Treasury can use all the help it can get.



James McCusker is a Bothell economist, educator and consultant. He also writes a monthly column for the Snohomish County Business Journal.

READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click hereLog out

1. Snohomish County man dies of swine flu
2. Lynnwood bank reprimanded by government
3. Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
4. Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
5. IRS joins puppy mill investigation
6. Jetty Island ready for sand castles
7. Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
8. Warriors & Patriots: Many American Indians served before getting full citizenship rights
9. Movin' out
10. Marshals seize swindler's home
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT