Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, JULY 5, 2009 9:56 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
The Buzz
What, me worry?
Your town news
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: This year, Poochapalooza is for dogs and dancers
Latest gallery

7-2 THE DAY IN PICTURES
July 2. 2009 (7 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire
Sailors for a day: Naval Station Everett opens ...
Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Nation & World   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Do you have a news tip?
newstips@heraldnet.com | 425.339.3400
 
Published: Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Universal health-care consensus emerging

WASHINGTON -- After decades of failed efforts to reshape the nation's health-care system, a consensus appears to be emerging in Washington about how to achieve the elusive goal of providing medical insurance to all Americans.

The answer, say leading groups of businesses, hospitals, doctors, labor unions and insurance companies -- as well as senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill and members of the new Barack Obama administration -- is unprecedented government intervention to create a system of universal protection.

At the same time, these groups, which span the ideological and political spectrum, largely have agreed to preserve the current employer-based system through which most Americans obtain their health insurance.

The idea of a federal, single-payer system patterned on those in Europe and Canada, long a dream of the political left, is now virtually off the table. Rejected as well is the traditionally conservative concept, championed by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., during the presidential campaign, of reforming health care mainly by giving incentives for more Americans to buy their own insurance.

There is also a widespread understanding that any expansion of coverage must be accompanied by aggressive efforts to bring down costs and reward quality care. And key players in the debate increasingly back a massive investment of taxpayer money for health-care reform, despite the burgeoning budget deficits.

Beyond these areas of basic agreement, the details of what would be one of the most momentous changes in domestic policy since World War II remain vague. As a presidential candidate, Obama embraced both expanded insurance coverage and preservation of the job-centered system, but he has provided few specifics about his plans.

Disagreements over specifics could lead to stalemate again. Even the most sanguine advocates of sweeping reform concede that difficult negotiations lie ahead.

But what is taking shape is a debate very different from previous discussions about what America's health-care system should look like.

"A lot has changed," said Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, a leading trade group whose members helped kill the Clinton administration's health-care campaign in the early '90s.

AHIP is participating in talks with other interest groups to build consensus before Obama takes office in January and Congress begins debating any health-care legislation.

Among the issues to be decided as more concrete proposals emerge in the months ahead is whether the roughly 46 million uninsured people in the U.S. will be pushed to buy private coverage or be enrolled in a government insurance program, as some consumer groups want.

Hospitals and doctors fear another public program would reduce what they are paid, as Medicare and Medicaid have done. Insurers worry they could lose customers to the government.

Also unresolved is what mechanisms might be created to force individuals or businesses to obtain insurance, both potentially contentious subjects.

And few have tackled how the government will control costs and set standards of care, proposals that raise the unpopular prospect of federal regulators dictating which doctors Americans can see and what drugs they can take.

"There are some very big questions and some very big stumbling blocks," said Stuart Butler, vice president for domestic policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, who has been watching the health-care debate for three decades.

"Once you get into the details, the consensus is going to vanish pretty quickly, I suspect," he said.

At the same time, advocates for a single-payer system, including the California Nurses Association, have vowed to continue pushing the idea next year along with many Democrats on Capitol Hill.

And Republican lawmakers, though still reeling from their losses last month, have signaled discomfort with a major expansion of government spending, a position many in the GOP hope will help return the party to power.

"Increasing access for the uninsured is not going to come cheap," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said at a recent hearing on health-care reform. "And it's clear to me that our economy cannot stand much further deficit spending."

Nonetheless, the current agreement on principles contrasts markedly with previous reform efforts. Today, many of the key players in the debate see the importance of preserving those elements of the current health-care system that many Americans say they like.

"There is a growing understanding that you have to give people choice and you can't take away what they have," said Ron Pollack, head of Families USA, an advocacy group for health-care consumers that is working with a diverse collection of interest groups to build consensus. "One of the big no-nos is that you must not ever threaten the coverage that people have."

READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click hereLog out

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes
2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun
3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture
4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere
5. Popular park changing hands
6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington
7. Why, governor?
8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan
10. Arlington buys up more water rights
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT