Letters

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   HAVE YOUR SAY Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Send it to: E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com Mail: Letters section The Herald P.O. Box 930 Everett, WA 98206 Fax: 425-339-3458 Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).   Published: Monday, February 23, 2009 STANWOOD Flooding's roots further upstream Regarding the Feb. 3 letter, "City made flooding to the south worse": I can truly sympathize with the writer. I also have been flooded and it was a very traumatic event. Since that event I have done research on the subject and I conclude that the writer's focus of blame on the city of Stanwood is misplaced. The real problem is further upstream and includes the entire Stillaguamish watershed. The culprit is the speed with which the water arrives in the valley. It used to take days for the water to drain down to the mouth; now it takes hours. This is due to the increased development in the rural portion of the watershed and the resulting loss of vegetation needed to slow the water flow. Here is what I find ironic -- the person the writer specifically thanks is County Councilman John Koster. However, for years he has been one of the councilmen who most aggressively pushed for this destructive development in the rural areas. Just check his voting record. He was one of the prime supporters of converting Island Crossing farmland (flood plain) to be used as a car lot, he supported legislation to allow fully contained communities in rural areas, he voted in support of the Soundview development in Warm Beach, plus he supports density bonuses for rural cluster developments. All of these actions are designed to drive greater development/populations into rural areas. This creates more impervious surfaces in the watershed and speeds the surface water flows to the river. Now, guess who voted against increased funding for surface water management? Yes, John Koster! So, I believe praise of John Koster is also misplaced. He bears a strong responsibility for the letter writer's flooding predicament. Dave Ridgeway Stanwood

1. Shot ends search for man sought in killing of Seattle police officer 2. Thousands honor slain Seattle police officer Timothy Brenton 3. No charge will be filed in death of Everett pedestrian 4. Rain, thunderstorms forecast for lowlands 5. Bothell steamrolls Stanwood 6. PREP FOOTBALL/SWIMMING ROUNDUP: Halfback pass for touchdown sparks Sultan win 7. More jibba-jabba 8. Obama OK's homebuyer tax credit 9. Suspect identified in Seattle police killing 10. Dana nibbles into Somers’ lead 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Gough on track to keep job • Jazz vocalist headlines NPAC • Mountlake Terrace makes football history • Tax revenue sagging, city budgets lagging • ‘Touch of Magic' show opens at Gallery North • Jackson repeats as South champs • Holiday Bazaars Calendar • Meadowdale storms back to grab title • Edmonds moves to Fire District 1 • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million