Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Sunday, July 12, 2009 Sex offenders' online social activities may soon be monitored By Jerry Cornfield, Herald Writer OLYMPIA -- Thousands of convicted sex offenders who must now tell authorities where they live also could be required to share the names and addresses they use when hanging out online. A statewide panel is considering whether high-risk juvenile and adult sex offenders should be required to register e-mail addresses, blogs and usernames on social networking sites such as Facebook. Some argue the information will help law enforcement keep better track of these criminals. Others worry it will create a false sense of safety if the public believes every mouse click by these offenders will be monitored when it won't. The Sex Offender Policy Board will sort through the arguments and make recommendations to the Legislature in November. They'll be part of the panel's broader review of the state's system of registration and public notification of sex offenders. Rep. Kirk Pearson, R-Monroe, hopes the panel backs the change. In 2008, Pearson unsuccessfully pushed a bill requiring sex offender e-mail and Web addresses be registered. This year's version, authored by Rep. Brad Klippert, R-Sunnyside, passed after it was revised into a study by the policy board. "It's not a bad idea for law enforcement to have that information on file," said Pearson, the ranking Republican on the House public safety committee. "I do think it can help when they're doing their investigations." Brad Meryhew, a criminal defense lawyer on the policy board, sees more negatives than benefits. It will be costly to implement, difficult to enforce and those convicted of serious sex offenses can already be barred as a condition of their sentence from using the Internet, said Meryhew, a Seattle attorney whose practice is exclusively representing sex offenders. He foresees rashes of offenders charged with failure to register if they don't inform authorities quickly enough of a new e-mail or revised Facebook account. "It doesn't make sense. I don't see how community safety is improved by having someone's e-mail addresses," he said. "I don't think its a practical way to get at Internet-related offenses." Today, 21 states mandate that sex offenders provide data about their online identities at the time they register their home address, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The number likely will grow in the next year because a federal law requires states enact rules for collection of the data by July 2010. Those that don't comply could lose out on thousands or even millions of federal dollars for law enforcement. Washington's Sex Offender Policy Board is a 16-member panel with representatives of courts, prisons, crime victims, prosecutors and defense attorneys. Created two years ago, it's been analyzing treatment, supervision and housing of sex offenders as well as prevention of sex offenses. It's been measuring the state's guidelines against the federal statute. In the coming weeks it will focus on tracking the online habits of registered sex offenders, which now number about 4,370 statewide. Anmarie Aylward of the Department of Corrections isn't sure which path to go. Research is limited. Yet, she said, "It may be good public policy." If an offender is prevented from using a false identity on a site like MySpace then it's worth trying, said Aylward, a board member. On the other hand, she said, "We don't want to set up something that gives people the impression that if they are Twittering somebody, that person is not a sex offender. We won't know that for certain." Kecia Rongen, a program administrator in the state's Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration and a policy board member, said different juvenile and adult offenders need to be treated differently. Juveniles convicted of sex offenses are, for the most part, not using the Internet to facilitate their crime, she said. For many, going online will help them re-engage in society, she said. Any gains could be blunted by overly restrictive registration mandates. Like Meryhew, she worried about juveniles getting sent back to jail for failing to promptly inform authorities of a new user account. "Being selective about whom we apply the rules to makes the most sense," she said. Snohomish County Sheriff John Lovick said his detectives could certainly benefit as they use the Internet to track and contact the offenders. Officers could send e-mails informing sex offenders of changes in law or simply to get in touch with them for some unresolved matter, he said. Attorney General Rob McKenna, whose office is represented on the policy board, avoided an absolute stance. "I think it is definitely worth considering. If the goal is to monitor what the sex offender is doing, it probably makes sense to check their use of social networks," he said. It won't be effective without follow-up and law enforcement's lack of resources makes that difficult, he said. McKenna's office makes wide use of existing social media from Facebook to Twitter and everything in between. He said he does it to go to where the public hangs out. That's what makes it alluring to sex offenders. "They go where the prey is," he said. Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623, jcornfield@heraldnet.com. READER COMMENTS Log in or register to post new comment | Log out (No heading) www.oncefallen.com, You are so correct. We are loosing constitutional rights while we slowely cook like a frog in the pot. Linda Wagner | Jul 12, 2009 8:11 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal (No heading) Feminist definition: "sex offender" --> A man. The evil in Olympia knows no limits. They will destroy every man in Washington if they are allowed to do so. The 4th Reich is alive and well. Bob Knows | Jul 12, 2009 8:09 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal Lets get to the real crux of the problem. Lets get to the real crux of the problem. It isn't so much the sex offenders as it is law makers passing laws without "Evidence based research." The Adam Walsh Amendment (AWA), was passed under "Suspension of Rules," which means "non-controversial" Now I ask you. HOW STUPID IS THAT? Law makers at both federal and state levels, are making laws without "Evidence Based Research!" Now, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee met March 10, this year and will be meeting again, to look at "Evidence Based Research." Why? Because the laws as they are written at both federal and state levels have many unintended consequences and are causing "MORE HARM THAN GOOD." A recent study that has not as yet been released: NEW STUDY: AWA (SORNA) Tier II & Tier III are less dangerous than Tier I Here: http://cfcoklahoma.org/New_Site/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=0&func=view&catid=84&id=2312#2312 and HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE S REQUEST FOR INTERIM STUDY PROPOSAL Adam Walsh Amendment ( AWA). HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE(S) REQUEST FOR INTERIM STUDY PROPOSAL Community Safety – concerns regarding the implementation in Oklahoma of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act Here: http://cfcoklahoma.org/New_Site/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=0&func=view&catid=42&id=2315#2315 This is an excellent read and every citizen of each state needs to read this and after doing so, WRITE EVERY MEMBER OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE AT BOTH STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS AND DEMAND THEY ONLY PASS LAWS THAT ARE "EVIDENCE BASED. NOT FEAR based, NOT "Emotionally" based because as in this case. "Emotions definitely lacks intelligence." Why? Because the laws as they are written "DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD." These laws are wasteing BILLIONS and BILLIONS of tax payers hard earned money and they PROTECT NO ONE! These laws are insane. They DON'T WORK!! Linda Wagner | Jul 12, 2009 8:08 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal (No heading) www.oncefallen.com -- Its not like a new identifier could be made in like 2 minutes. I proved my point to Alabama legislators by creating an account using that state's AG as my address. Like I said, a stupid big brother law. Trust me, soon they'll use it against you. Fallen One | Jul 12, 2009 8:04 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal You have GOT to be kidding!!!! You people are some of the stupidest in the world! If you think some law like this is going to prevent anyone, not just sex offenders, from creating and using different usernames and email addresses every single time they turn on a computer, then you are living in a fantasy word. It's these politicians that play on your emotions to win re-election that create these warm and fuzzy, feel-good-do-nothing laws that keep the general STUPID public like yourselves feeling all, "safe and secure because our lawmakers said it would". You apathetic bunch of morons. Why don't you ask the lawmakers to do something REALLY constructive with their time. You Wish | Jul 12, 2009 5:09 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal (No heading) For those who don't see why we should keep tabs on sex offenders who use the internet...WHY NOT? Really, what will it hurt to keep thier email addresses on file? I say go for it! As far as I am concerned they already lost all thier rights once they commit a crime like that. Suzie Jacobs | Jul 12, 2009 7:30 am | 2 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal (No heading) The fact that this is not being done already is appalling. As far as I'm concerned these people lost their rights when they decided to become the worst of the worst by molesting children and raping women. Level 2 and level 3 offenders definitely should be monitored in every way possible, including implanting GPS. How many more repeat offenders, some of whom kill their victims, do we have to have before the so-called "protectors of society" figure out that this scum should be monitored every way possible every moment for the rest of their lives. Which hopefully won't be long. Cheryl Fontaine | Jul 12, 2009 10:08 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal The slime of humanity These people should have no rights period, that includes the right to breath air. Rich Kruml | Jul 12, 2009 9:46 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. Shot ends search for man sought in killing of Seattle police officer 2. Thousands honor slain Seattle police officer Timothy Brenton 3. No charge will be filed in death of Everett pedestrian 4. Rain, thunderstorms forecast for lowlands 5. Bothell steamrolls Stanwood 6. PREP FOOTBALL/SWIMMING ROUNDUP: Halfback pass for touchdown sparks Sultan win 7. More jibba-jabba 8. Obama OK's homebuyer tax credit 9. Suspect identified in Seattle police killing 10. Dana nibbles into Somers’ lead 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Gough on track to keep job • Jazz vocalist headlines NPAC • Mountlake Terrace makes football history • Tax revenue sagging, city budgets lagging • ‘Touch of Magic' show opens at Gallery North • Jackson repeats as South champs • Holiday Bazaars Calendar • Meadowdale storms back to grab title • Edmonds moves to Fire District 1 • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million