Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Sunday, July 12, 2009 Tulalips lay out vision for reservation land use By Krista J. Kapralos Herald Writer TULALIP -- The Tulalip Indian Reservation may become home to nearly 6,500 jobs if growth outlined in the tribes' new comprehensive plan becomes a reality. That's nearly 2,600 more jobs on the reservation than exist today. The new jobs are expected to be created in the retail, manufacturing and government sectors. The plan, prepared by the Tulalip Tribes, offers a glimpse at what may happen on a 22,500-acre section of reservation land that is largely exempt from state and county jurisdiction, including zoning codes, infrastructure regulations and taxes. The tribal government isn't ­required in most cases to share its plans for economic expansion or natural resource protection, but the 2009 Comprehensive Land Use Plan includes clues as to how the Tulalip Indian Reservation is expected to change between now and 2030. A public meeting is scheduled for July 22 at Quil Ceda Village to review the plan. "Hopefully all the comments will be good," Tulalip tribal planner Gus Taylor said. Tribal planners have been working with Snohomish County planners to align both governments' land-use plans, Taylor said. Other highlights of the plan include: The number of tribal members is expected to grow by more than 50 percent over the next 21 years, from about 4,000 to about 6,200. Most future development is expected to occur in the 6,827-acre southern portion and the 5,090-acre northeastern portion of the reservation, which have the greatest potential due to existing infrastructure and planned water and sewer line expansions. The plan hints that the tribal government could be ready to take action regarding some long-standing disputes with nontribal residents of the reservation. According to the document, the tribal government expects to this year release a shoreline management plan that will address the health of waterfront areas. The tribe claims ownership of all the shoreline and tideland ­areas within the reservation's boundaries, but non-Indian landowners say their property deeds prove that their ownership extends out into the water. Non-Indian developments along the waterfront have had an "incremental but profound effect on water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and tribal members' ability to access, use and fish along reservation shorelines," the Tulalips' land-use plan states. Tribal leaders also decided, according to the land-use plan, to not renew leases held by some non-­Indians who have built homes on tribal land. They've announced in recent years that they didn't intend to indefinitely renew the leases, as some homeowners said they expected would happen. That decision is in part to protect fragile shoreline ­areas, but also to free up land for tribal members in need of homes. At last count, there were about 300 tribal families on a housing waiting list. About 60 percent of the reservation is owned by either the tribal government or tribal members. The rest of the land is owned by nontribal members. Krista J. Kapralos: 425-339-3422, kkapralos@heraldnet.com. READER COMMENTS Log in or register to post new comment | Log out A sentence is misquoted & incorrect Please pay attention. The following sentence in this article is MISQUOTED and INCORRECT. It says "Non-Indian developments along the waterfront have had an incremental but profound effect on water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and tribal members' ability to access, use and fish along reservation shorelines," the Tulalips' land-use plan states. The CORRECT version described in the proposed Tribal Comprehensive Plan is namely "Many beach communities are comprised of houses built on small lots with septic systems and accessory structures such as bulkheads, beach access structures, and docks that encroach onto Tribal tidelands. This has had an incremental but profound effect on water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and Tribal members’ ability to access, use and fish along Reservation shorelines." You'll find these statement on page 43, paragraph 3, under Shorline and Tidelands item. It does not identify "Non-Indian developments along the waterfront" at all. Here's the link to the proposed Comprehensive Plan and the statement in question: http://www.tulaliptribes-nsn.gov/Portals/0/pdf/departments/public_notices/CompPln_FinalDraft.pdf Krongthip Sangkapreecha | Jul 13, 2009 12:12 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. Shot ends search for man sought in killing of Seattle police officer 2. Thousands honor slain Seattle police officer Timothy Brenton 3. No charge will be filed in death of Everett pedestrian 4. Rain, thunderstorms forecast for lowlands 5. Bothell steamrolls Stanwood 6. PREP FOOTBALL/SWIMMING ROUNDUP: Halfback pass for touchdown sparks Sultan win 7. More jibba-jabba 8. Obama OK's homebuyer tax credit 9. Suspect identified in Seattle police killing 10. Dana nibbles into Somers’ lead 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Gough on track to keep job • Jazz vocalist headlines NPAC • Mountlake Terrace makes football history • Tax revenue sagging, city budgets lagging • ‘Touch of Magic' show opens at Gallery North • Jackson repeats as South champs • Holiday Bazaars Calendar • Meadowdale storms back to grab title • Edmonds moves to Fire District 1 • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million