Referendum 71 - the legal counterattack
Related Items
- Adobe PDF
Monday, August 17, 2009 | 10:44 am
Deputy Solicitor General Jim Pharris has put forth the state's arguments for why the names of those who signed petitions for Referendum 71 should be made public.
Pharris filed the paperwork Friday. A copy is attached.
Protect Marriage Washington is seeking to keep all the names and addresses confidential. On July 29, a federal judge granted its request for a temporary restraining order and set a Sept. 3 date for a hearing on whether to extend it or not.
What Pharris filed was in response to the group's initial 500-plus page court filing. You can read some of that document at my earlier post. on this case.
Pharris filed the paperwork Friday. A copy is attached.
Protect Marriage Washington is seeking to keep all the names and addresses confidential. On July 29, a federal judge granted its request for a temporary restraining order and set a Sept. 3 date for a hearing on whether to extend it or not.
What Pharris filed was in response to the group's initial 500-plus page court filing. You can read some of that document at my earlier post. on this case.
Most recent The Petri Dish posts
- Labor groups to host forum in Everett for 1st Congressional District candidates Feb. 15
- Gregoire: Santorum visit won't overshadow same-sex marriage law Feb. 13
- Will Santorum address lawmakers or just wave at them? Feb. 11
- Same-sex marriage bill to be signed Monday Feb. 9
- McKenna website posts form letter allowing people to thank him Feb. 9
Comments
(
