Heraldnet.com
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010 8:37 pm
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Herald Editorial Board

Bob Bolerjack,
Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson,
Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@
heraldnet.com


Allen Funk,
Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

Kim Heltne,
Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com

Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Monday


Lynnwood woman knew area's stories long before ...
Everett rethinks boutique wineries
A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood
Sunday


Marysville family comes together amid devastati...
Monroe Correctional Complex to lessen security ...
Extra patrols will be watching for drunken driv...
Saturday


Olympics are in the air
Everett police officers cleared in 2008 shootin...
Edmonds woman leaves gift of millions
Friday


Budget squeeze may close beloved Trafton school
Endgame near on airport flight debate?
Aaron Reardon laments political sparring with c...
Thursday


4-car police pileup in Everett under investigation
Edmonds educator, famous announcer dies
Bill would suspend limits on tax hikes
Wednesday


Citizenship classes: All for a better life
Many Snohomish County kids haven't had second d...
Snohomish County jail thrives under sheriff's m...
Tuesday


Mukilteo kids’ cards help Haitians
County Council increases scrutiny on Reardon
Pentagon report a good sign for Everett's Navy ...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorials   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
HAVE YOUR SAY
Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor.
You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another.
Send it to:
E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206
Fax: 425-339-3458
Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).
 
Published: Wednesday, September 16, 2009

U.S. TANKER COMPETITION

Policy conflict stands out

In the soon-to-be-renewed competition to build $35 billion worth of aerial refueling tankers for the U.S. Air Force, an inherent contradiction in U.S. policy is starker than ever.

An interim ruling issued recently by a World Trade Organization panel says that European countries have made illegal subsidies to Airbus that have injured the Boeing Co., according to several lawmakers who have been briefed on the ruling. Boeing and the U.S. trade representative have argued that point for nearly five years.

While the WTO case doesn't directly affect the tanker competition — it's about commercial airplane production — it highlights a distressing disparity between U.S. policy on trade and military procurement.

The Air Force is expected to launch a new tanker bidding competition this month between Boeing and a partnership between Airbus' parent company and U.S.-based Northrop Grumman. The latter proposes to build a tanker based on Airbus' A330 jetliner and assemble it at a new plant in Alabama. Boeing says it will counter with a tanker based either on the 767 or the larger 777, depending on the Air Force's requirements. Both of those airframes are assembled in Everett.

While we believe competition for government contracts is healthy, even essential, it also must be fair. The WTO's ruling suggests that Airbus has for decades received billions of dollars in illegal aid from European governments that has allowed Boeing's chief rival to develop new models without much of the market risk Boeing routinely assumes.

Few doubt that Boeing and its top-flight workforce can provide the Air Force with the most reliable, cost-effective tanker that can be built. Given that, it makes no sense for one arm of the U.S. government — the Pentagon — to hand the European rival of a U.S. manufacturer a business victory while another arm is making headway in an effort to show that rival has received illegal benefits.

Awarding all or part of the tanker contract to the Airbus consortium could also erode the manufacturing bases and economies of Puget Sound and Wichita, Kan., which is home to much of Boeing's military production. If Airbus builds a plant in Alabama for tanker production, it would undoubtedly serve as a platform for expanded commercial production. Europe's illegal subsidies will have paid off handsomely.

In light of the WTO ruling, members of Washington's congressional delegation, including Rep. Rick Larsen and Sen. Patty Murray, are urging the Obama administration to get its trade and defense procurement priorities on the same page. Anyone with an interest in fairness should join them.

COMMENTS | Be the first to comment

Log in or register to post a new comment.


To read other terms and conditions, click here

Other Advertisers
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT