| HeraldNet - Snohomish County's online news source |
 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010 10:50 pm |
ADVERTISEMENT |
|||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Local News 
|
|||||||||||||||
Supporters, foes sound off on Referendum 71 Passionate pleas for and against the equal rights measure are voiced in a debate Monday in Lynnwood LYNNWOOD — Supporters and opponents of Referendum 71 squared off Monday night on whether voters should view the measure as providing equal rights for all families or undermining the foundation of traditional marriage.Representatives of the two sides kept their emotions in check as they debated the most controversial item on the Nov. 3 ballot in front of 100 people and cable television cameras in the Black Box Theater at Edmonds Community College. “This is extraordinarily personal. It will be 200 rights and responsibilities my partner and I will benefit from,” said Joe Mirabella, a volunteer with Washington Families Standing Together, the group campaigning for approval of the referendum. There will be “significant” costs to the majority of society unless the measure is rejected, said Joseph Backholm, executive director of the Lynnwood-based Family Policy Institute of Washington. “There are very real implications for religious liberty, rights of conscience and public education. The state will be imposing its will on those who disagree” with this law, he said. Referendum 71 asks voters to approve or reject the latest expansion of the state's domestic partnership law passed by state legislators earlier this year. That law, which would only take effect if voters approve Referendum 71, would grant registered domestic partnerships the same rights, responsibilities and obligations under state law now enjoyed by married couples, with the exception of marriage. As of Monday, there were 6,119 registered domestic partnerships in Washington, most of which are same-sex couples. The law also covers unmarried heterosexual couples if one partner is at least 62. “I think every family in Washington deserves the same basic protections,” said Rep. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, one of the Legislature's gay lawmakers. “The benefits to 12,000 people are real and the cost to the rest of us who are not in domestic partnerships are zero.” Protect Marriage Washington, a coalition of conservative social and religious groups led by Larry Stickney of Arlington, collected enough signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot. Now, the sponsors of the petition want voters to reject it. Bob Struble of Bremerton, representing the sponsors, said the law would demolish the state's existing law defining marriage as between a man and a woman. It also would ignite litigation that most likely would lead to the state Supreme Court — not voters — legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. “The people of Washington will never get a chance to vote on gay marriage,” he said. The forum was taped for the cable program “Civic Engagement” and will be shown several times on channels 21 and 26 in south Snohomish County. Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623; jcornfield@heraldnet.com. On the Web Approve: Washington Families Standing Together: http://approvereferendum71.org Reject: Protect Marriage Washington: www.protectmarriagewa.com |
- A revolutionary 747
- Fire breaks out at Everett car dealer
- Everett rethinks boutique wineries
- A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood
- Snohomish County's bargain housing won't last
- Boeing's 747-8 takes off after weather delay
- Plan for I-5 closures this week
- A new bowling alley for Monroe?
- Lake Stevens man homeless after fire
- I-5 bridge joint may give you a jolt, but it isn't damaged
- Vote on school levies by Tuesday
(11) - A tidy lawn could be law in Lynnwood (10)
- State Senate votes to toss I-960's tax-raising hurdle (9)
- Lynnwood sets height limit on grass: 8 inches (8)
- Everett rethinks boutique wineries (5)
- Everett police officers cleared in 2008 shooting death (5)
- 1949 travel aid shows how few places blacks were welcome in Washington (4)
- I-5 bridge joint may give you a jolt, but it isn't damaged (4)
- A new bowling alley for Monroe? (3)
- Toyota has powerful D.C. friends (3)
- Edmonds educator, famous announcer dies
- Mill Creek to appeal ruling on annexation
- Through the air, with the greatest of ease
- E-W thriving under new coach
- The path to citizenship
- EUUC puts on ‘Pants & Shoes’
- Wolfpack wins the ‘Battle'
- Lynnwood’s annexation plans OK’d
- Arlington's Cascade Valley Hospital celebrates expansion, national award and 100 years of service
- Business Licences Feb. 2010
- Technology tips for launching your own business
- Business Events Feb. 2010
- Tech Talk: No excuse today for going without a Web site
- State already raising fees and rates that restrict business growth
- Some legislators again targeting people’s initiative petition rights
|
 
|
|
|
|
| TODAY'S TOP JOBS |
| View All Top Jobs |
| Top Cars |
|
| Top Homes |
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|Contact Us
|Advertiser Services
|Home Delivery
|Newsstand Locations
|Classifieds
|Feedback
|About the Company
|Work@the Herald
|Site Map |
|
COMMENTS
Log in or register to post a new comment.
To read other terms and conditions, click here
The purpose of SB 5688 was never about securing legal rights that do not already exist. GLBTers pushed through the legislation in order to simplify future planned legislation to legalize same-sex marriage. They over-stepped.
Then threatened anyone who signed the petition to bring Referendum 71 to a vote of the people.
No one should be denied legal rights and protections. However, redefining marriage will throw our legal system into chaos. Yes, secure legal rights and protections where they do not already exist. And, unequivocally establish, in State law, that marriage is between one man and one woman.
And stop with the threats, and name calling. That is the surest way to see the GLBT agenda go down in flames.
Vote Rejected on Referendum 71
Gordon Dewey | Oct 13, 2009 9:35 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply
APPROVE 71
No one has the right to deny anothers civil right.
Please, I understand your fear, but it is only ignorance that wants to deny others. Let's move forward and NOT step back. Approve 71 and you'll see that you made the right choice.
cynthia worthen | Oct 13, 2009 5:33 am | 0 replies | Request removal
Post reply