Heraldnet.com
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009 12:05 pm
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Midday Snacks
Artist with an amazing talent
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Kennedy’s assassination remains a puzzling memory
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Everett man will take his do-it-yourself ethic to the grave
Latest gallery

Opening Day at Stevens Pass
November 19. 2009 (10 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Sunday


Nurse seeks help healing hidden wounds of wars
Count drags on long after the election's over
Groups work to help those in uniform
Saturday


Nearly 30 kids adopted during annual event in S...
Gold Bar couple admit animal cruelty in puppy m...
Arlington area man's arrest in alleged burglar'...
Friday


Nearly 2,000 turn out for Stevens Pass opening day
Victim of alleged burglary now a suspect in kil...
Shelter asks for diaper donations during holida...
Thursday


Safety long a concern for road involved in fata...
State budget's $2 billion hole will require dee...
County considers building for disaster response...
Wednesday


Jury will decide accident or murder in girl's s...
Marysville rejects idea of a much later start f...
Flu’s full force shocks an Edmonds man an...
Tuesday


Year in jail for fired principal who kidnapped ...
State senator's ex-in-law threatened to kill hi...
$2 billion short, state will find tax talk hard...
Monday


Friends mourn 2 killed in Lynnwood crash
'No Child' law sees more students transferring ...
"Nutcracker" is link to family history for 6-ye...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Tuesday, October 20, 2009

I-1033: Healthy restraint or a chokehold on government services?

Eyman says government needs limits; cities say it would cripple them

From Sultan to Edmonds, city council members are lining up against Initiative 1033 out of concern it will slowly starve their communities of money for vital services.

Democrats and Republicans worry Tim Eyman's latest ballot proposal is such a restrictive fiscal measure it could impede economic recovery in their cities if they cannot afford to make investments in new projects.

It's been a recurring theme expressed by council members in Everett, Edmonds, Sultan and Mill Creek — to name a few — as they've passed resolutions opposing the initiative.

“We have not cried the blues in the city of Everett about past initiatives. We have lived within the means put upon us by our citizens,” Mayor Ray Stephanson said. “This initiative, frankly, just goes too far.”

Administrators of small cities foresee a proliferation of levy measures to fund basic operations.

“One of the potential outcomes is cities would end up being like school districts and fire districts and going to the voters on a regular basis with levies,” said Deborah Knight, administrator for the city of Sultan.

Eyman expected these dire predictions because he said policymakers at every level fear measures that try to rein in their amassing and spending of tax dollars.

“Government is a wild stallion that doesn't want a bit in its mouth, doesn't want a saddle on its back. It wants to run free and clear with absolutely no restraints,” Eyman said. “Our initiative puts a pretty good saddle on it, but it will continue to run in the direction that it wants to go.”

Initiative 1033 aims to curb government spending by limiting the consumption of tax dollars by cities, counties and the state. It does not apply to school, fire, port and other special districts.

It sets a cap on how much revenue from property, business and sales taxes can be collected each year by city, county and state governments. Federal funding is excluded from the revenue cap, as is money raised from voter-approved fees or taxes.

This cap would rise each year at the rate of inflation plus population growth. If Initiative 1033 is approved, it will use the amount of revenues received in 2009 as the base year, and the cap would be applied starting next year.

Any tax revenues collected above the cap are steered into a separate account and used to lower property taxes. Only those who own property will be eligible for this tax rebate.

The state Office of Financial Management estimates I-1033 could, by 2015, divert nearly $9 billion from the general funds of cities, counties and state government. Those accounts cover costs of everything from street sweepers and police officers in cities to health care and public education statewide.

Of the sum, $5.9 billion could be siphoned from the state general fund, $700 million from counties and $2 billion from cities, according to the agency's estimates.

Some cities are estimating their share of loss. Edmonds, for example, predicts it may lose out on $530,617 in 2011 and $2 million by 2015.

With such numbers, it's no surprise the level of nervousness among elected officials and those dependent on public funding.

Senior Services of Snohomish County gets money from the state and county for a variety of programs. Pain will trickle down to needy seniors if those dollars are lost, said Dave Earling, president of the nonprofit's board of directors.

For example, the group receives $20,000 for about 1,300 meals in the Meals on Wheels program.

“We won't be able to serve meals to some who are housebound. Those are real people who will be affected,” said Earling, an Edmonds resident and former Republican candidate for Snohomish County executive.

Stephanson said the initiative could sap Everett's willingness to involve itself in public-private ventures.

“There will be no incentive to pursue economic development opportunities because they come with a cost such as police and fire services and roads,” he said.

Sultan is getting righted financially after years of difficult budgets and could be knocked off-balance again, Knight said.

“There's been a slow erosion of revenues because of the recession. That slow erosion is going to continue with this,” Knight said.

“For Sultan, we feel like we've finally balanced our budget and provided services to the community that we haven't been able to provide for several years and we're concerned we'll be back to 2005,” she said.

Eyman said he revised his measure more than once in hopes of pre-empting some of the criticisms that have surfaced.

For example, he initially wanted revenues to grow at the rate of inflation only. He added population growth based on comments expressed by local government leaders.

Permanently excluding new revenue approved by voters is a safety valve provided for politicians.

“We try to strike a balance between what government says it needs and what we want,” Eyman said. “Over time, we'll get the government we want and the government we can afford.”

Not everyone's opposition stems from the potential fiscal consequences of the initiative.

Bothell Mayor Mark Lamb, a self-described conservative Republican, called it a “top-down, big government” approach that punishes well-run cities and poorly managed ones the same way.

“I don't think Tim Eyman knows how to run every single city in the state of Washington,” said Lamb, who was an attorney for sponsors of Initiative 912, which sought to repeal the 2005 gas tax increase passed by the Legislature.

“Initiative 1033 says one person knows best how every single city should operate. I think that is electoral hubris in the extreme,” he said.

In response, Eyman said the measure is “personalized” with the cap varying from city to city because of different rates of population growth.

Local control, he argues, is strengthened by letting voters decide whenever their city or county wants to raise money beyond the cap.

“When politicians say you're taking away local control, I say, ‘No, we're taking it away from you politicians and giving it back to voters,' ” Eyman said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Jerry Cornfield: 360-352-8623, jcornfield@heraldnet.com.

READER COMMENTS
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
(No heading)
"Renters don't pay property tax, so I don't give a rats *** what renters think. Don't try to tell me it's a part of their rent- because I'd love my mortgage to be equitable to the average rent in the area."

And I'd like to own a home after 20 years of renting. How about you put some actual thought into your arguments before you pine for some taxpayer money.

Dave Smith | Oct 21, 2009 2:47 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Yes on I-1033 we need this now and how
The state and cities have been running wild for years with bad investments, overpaying for the 2nd cousins property, hoping to get a kick back.

I see some of the power coming back to the people because of this and that I like. If you had the chance a while back to balance the Washington State budget, when it was posted on the State web site.

To see some of the waste of money services that we pay for. Daycare and ombudsman to take care of the politicians kids while they work in Olympia ect..

If it was me, I would go threw every single department, state run agency and services, DOT ect.. and make them show me where the money is going.

S G | Oct 21, 2009 1:31 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
I-1033 Hurts Renters.
Some 35% of households in Washington State are renters. They lose big under I-1033. Theu will both not get a tax rebate and also see no restored or new public services under I-1033.

Everyone pays sales taxes which last year accounted for 54% of state revenue. Only 12% of state revenue came from real estate taxes.

I-1033 is a tax shift that hurts low and middle income folks. Those with lots of property benefit most because Eyman's rebate is not propertional to the overall taxes you pay but only to the amount of proerty you own.

Vote No on this transfer of wealth to rich property owners. Keep Tim Eyman's hands out of our pockets.
No on I-1033.

Steve Zemke | Oct 20, 2009 11:38 am | 1 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Taxation
I-1033 is simply a nonviolent "Concord and Lexington." There was a time when the ruler of the most powerful government on this earth chose to overtax, and become overbearing toward its subjects. These loyal British subjects pleaded with the government of King George III for relief from increasingly onerous taxation and regulation. These loyal subjects finally had enough, fought back and created a government that became the United States. Initiative 1033 isn't a revolution, it isn't a battle at Concord or Lexington. Ruling Professional Politicians have proven they will not restrain their addiction to more spending and more taxation. The ruling class of Professional Politicians must to reconsider their attitudes towards loyal American and Washington State citizens. Don't suggest 'tossing them out of office.' Professional Politicians of every stripe are Professional Politicians first, last and always.
Richard Hartley | Oct 20, 2009 5:01 am | 1 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Still missing the point.
"It goes from my wallet to Queenie and her hoard. We need a prop. 13 and 2/3 super majority to raise taxes. Until then, they lie lie, and lie and just raise the taxes at will.

The gov't is just going to have to learn to BUDGET and prioritize; can't spend what you ant got. Something that they never seem to bother with."

I don't think you did get it, first time or any time. I even agree with some of your views, I went ahead and italicized them. However, what has that got to do with I-1033s disproportionate redistribution of tax dollars? If you want to cut budgets and give back tax money that's fine, but home owners taxes aren't the majority of taxes in WA, why should they get ALL of excess taxes back? How is that different from welfare or any other state sponsored redistribution of wealth?

Dave Smith | Oct 20, 2009 7:36 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
I got it alright--firt time and for many years...
It goes from my wallet to Queenie and her hoard. We need a prop. 13 and 2/3 super majority to raise taxes. Until then, they lie lie, and lie and just raise the taxes at will.

The gov't is just going to have to learn to BUDGET and prioritize; can't spend what you ant got. Something that they never seem to bother with.

K Dog | Oct 20, 2009 5:01 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Yes on I-1033
We are knee deep in dumb, and getting dumber I'm voting yes on I-1033 being part of that 35% renter that couldn't afford to pay the property taxes if I owned, but will complain the loudest when they start cutting school funding, and want them to cut the noxious weed crew and the red curb painters.

Willy C.

Will Clarkson | Oct 20, 2009 4:38 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
To K Dog
"So you expect landowners to pay for schools, libraries etc?"

Well... "Everyone pays sales taxes which last year accounted for 54% of state revenue. Only 12% of state revenue came from real estate taxes."

I went ahead and put the really important bit there in bold, but I'll break it down for you since it seams you didn't get it the first time.

Since any theoretical excess revenue is only 12% real estate tax, any system in which land owners contribute 12% of the excess but receive 100% of the excess back constitutes a redistribution of wealth.

Let me give you an example from a make believe budget to illustrate my point. City X in Washington had a budget cap of $100,000,000 for 2009-2010. In 2009-2010 City X generated $101,000,000, that's $1,000,000 which will go back to the tax payers. Since any one dollar that goes into the state coffers is indistinguishable from any other dollar its safe to assume that the extra million dollars is composed of the same kinds of dollars as the rest of the states revenue. This means that of the extra $1,000,000 dollars to go back to tax payers, only $120,000 would have been contributed by land owners paying real estate tax. So if I-1033 were to be enacted with the stipulations it has now, land owners would get back the $120,000 they contributed in extra revenue plus the $880,000 the rest of the tax payers contributed in extra revenue.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't see how that is a fair deal to the majority of tax payers.

Dave Smith | Oct 20, 2009 4:34 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Meals on Wheels
Some of you just love to prove that America is knee-deep in STUPID!

Meals on Wheels receives that money per YEAR, not per day. The majority of their funding comes from donations and other fund-raising programs. When was the last time you even went into a nursing home? How about you volunteer some of your time helping instead of complaining.

As with most other programs for seniors and the indigent, homeless and disabled - you 'Compassionate Conservatives' would rather just stuff these poor folks away in a hole where you don't have to see them and ask them to die quickly and quietly.

You people make me sick.

Jeff Craig | Oct 20, 2009 10:44 am | 1 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Taxes
We need a real prop. 13 and a 2/3 rule for tax increases. This way Queenie and her local gang would not be able to play this game very budget cycle.
K Dog | Oct 20, 2009 12:17 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
renters
So you expect landowners to pay for schools, libraries etc?

Let the local gov'ts get their money from Queenie. She promised no new taxes in her campaign....but...is already talking about at increases that show up at her desk (so she can't get blame for it?).

Car tabs--let me see--legislature ring a bell?

Emergency clauses--to subvert another initiative? Try to give legislature a break and they screw you later.

K Dog | Oct 20, 2009 11:54 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Why not?
Our government leaders have proven over and over again that they cannot hold costs down.

In this economy we the people are forced to do more with less but if government needs more money they come to us and demand more money. If any of us did that our employers would laugh as they were filling out the pink slip.

Why is it so unreasonable that government spending be limited to the rate of inflation? My paychecks have not gone up that fast in the last few years.

If there is an emergency that arises then they can still come to us and ask for more as they should have to do with any tax increase!

Why is it government's responsibility to pay for some of these services? Did they ask us if they can use our money to pay for them? There and many charities out there to assist.

Let's use some common sense here, oh yeh, this is govenrment we are talking about.

Todd Westby | Oct 20, 2009 11:06 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
meals
"the group receives $20,000 for about 1,300 meals in the Meals on Wheels program"

That's over $15 a meal. I wish I had somebody elses money to spend

david kirby | Oct 20, 2009 10:20 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
BS?
"I-1033 will not put a chokehold on governement services. I-1033 does not say what our taxes can be spent on, it just limits growth to inflation plus population growth"

Hey Kelly what if there is a disaster like a damn going to hell, wind storm or easthquake? Your local government would now have to ask for a levy? How much does it cost? How long does it take? Or a union or some special needs organization sues a city due to cuts it needs to make. Sounds like a chokehold to me. If you dont like how things are done, run for office. Heck Tim doesnt have the guts to do that.
We are only the 35th highest taxed state in the country. We have no income tax. We need to change how government budgets work. We now have the mentality spend it or lose it. That needs to change. I dont have the answer yet, but know this one isnt it. Im not full of BS Kelly, Im a realist.
I 1033 doesnt solve anything, Im no fortune teller, but if it passes I see good bye infrastructure.

Bill Proctor | Oct 20, 2009 9:54 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Eyman's an idiot
His statement that government is out of control is ludicrous. We the people are the government. It wouldn't be that way if we didn't want it that way. Whenever you ask what specific cuts should be made, he nor any other red-shirt can tell you. Because they are the first in line demanding government acountability, forcing this bloated bureaucracy. Get a clue Eyman.
Scott S. | Oct 20, 2009 9:12 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Sounds Better Than It Is
As a resident of a small town, I can say that I-1033 looks very appealing to us homeowners who are struggling. However, is it really going to put money of any significance back into my pocket? Not really. What I will see is the City's services dwindle down to nothing because they can't afford to keep those services going. I like knowing that my little town has police services for my protection, but they will be forced to cut the manpower because I-1033 will cut their budgets. To use 2009 as the base year is ludicrous, when all cities are dealing with budget deficits. Economic growth would be non-existent -- not to mention the badly needed sidewalks that my city lacks for our children to walk to school safely. By the way, has anyone ever paid the $30 license tab fees from Eyman's last big idea? Not me - EVER! The man just likes to toot his own horn.
Sheri Moon | Oct 20, 2009 8:53 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
What a load of BS!
I-1033 will not put a chokehold on governement services. I-1033 does not say what our taxes can be spent on, it just limits growth to inflation plus population growth.

The only entity that will cut government services is the City Councils. Don't let them put labor interests ahead of services.

I like the analogy to our fight for Independence. What the leaders need to understand is that 240 years ago there were many disgruntled taxpayers and eventually that disgruntlement turned into hatred.

DON'T LET US GET TO THAT POINT! Be responsible with our tax money.

Kelly Nichols | Oct 20, 2009 8:23 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
meals
"For example, the group receives $20,000 for about 1,300 meals in the Meals on Wheels program."

Thats over $15 a meal. Wish i could spend that kind of somebody elses money.

david kirby | Oct 20, 2009 8:15 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
They squeal like pigs gong to slaughter?
The pigs are going to slaughter. Ads on TV and now newspaper articles. The initiative would have never come up if gov't had lived within its means. It would have never come up if past initiatives were just ignored or circumvented by the various levels of gvo't--state, county, local.
K Dog | Oct 20, 2009 7:39 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
1033
"Initiative 1033 says one person knows best how every single city works"

This line is classic! Is is working in Colorado?
Tim please ..... Why dont you run for office and try and fix the problems "of government" instead of screwing things up again? There is no simple fix here, and your stupid answer is always the same....
They are trying to scare you blah blah blah they wont make cuts in social services blah blah The roads wont go to hell blah blah What if oil goes to 150 a barrel and they need to repave Evergreen Way? Where does the money come from a levy? How much does the average levy cost to run? Now multiply that times every city......hmmmmmmm TIM do the math, even levies cost money! Small towns like Darrington have to waste valuable resources to ask for a levy? What if there is an earthquake? flood? wind storm?This will make government react even slower than they do now.Will you pony up all the extra levy money? No..... you will be starting off another STUPID initiative to make a living.

2009 is the base year? That is your solution?
I dont always agree on how government is run, this spend it or lose it mentality needs to change 1033 is I have no other words for it..... Stupid, and shortsided. Tim has now magic wand, and is not looking at the big picture.

Tim Eyman only cares about getting media attention, and the income from his initiatives. Ill say it again, Tim I have no respect for you. If you want to fix government try running for office, and doing it the right way.

Bill Proctor | Oct 20, 2009 7:35 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
welcome to the real world
News flash! Some of us real people are actually having to rein in spending, cut costs and figure out a way to live within our means. Another news flash! GOVERNMENT HAS ENOUGH OF OUR MONEY - THEY JUST NEED TO SPEND IT CORRECTLY. I for one will never vote for anything that raises a single dime of taxes - I don't care if it's for schools, fire houses, EMTs or libraries. It's not because I don't care, it's because the government wastes MY money in a ridiculous fashion. I REPEAT: GOVERNMENT HAS ENOUGH OF OUR MONEY.
Cynthia Steenberg | Oct 20, 2009 6:50 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Well of course they are !!
"From Sultan to Edmonds, city council members are lining up against Initiative 1033..."

The operative term here is CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. It's not the public, who has to balance their checkbook every month, that is upset, but the politicians.

I'm voting for 1033.

Veritas Splendor | Oct 20, 2009 5:25 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
I-1033
I for one am totally for I-1033 for many reasons. Mostly due to the spend, spend, spend mentality of the gov't. I am sick and tired and fed up to you know where about the outrageous, out of control ways of this gov't. It's time has come to put a stop to the misuse of our tax dollars. There are so many ways to cut back on taxes, but no- our elected officials can only come up with increasing our taxes more and throwing out all of the programs for the needy first instead of homing in on excess gov't waste.
Yes I say, vote to put a stop to gov't and let us decide.

Jim Small | Oct 20, 2009 5:03 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. City of Everett, neighbor sued over lost trees, mudslide
2. Three-car accident closes Highway 9
3. Kennedy’s assassination remains a puzzling memory
4. Ways to Give: How you can help in your community
5. Take a look under your seat
6. Novice real estate investors can lose their shirts
7. Kwan never golden, but sometimes transcendant
8. Lotto ticket worth $6.5 million sold in Lake Stevens
9. Canceled credit cards come as a shock for some
10. Count drags on long after the election's over
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Eat local this Thanksgiving
Mavericks moving on
Canada's Great Big Sea rolls into Edmonds
A. Murphy finishes 2nd in volleyball
Art Walk features music, demonstrations
EAT LOCAL: Getting the goods
Lynnwood HS history teacher Vic Bennet dies
Wildcats head to semis
CSO Chamber annual show slated Nov. 23
The Enterprise Online Newspaper


$2 OFF
at Box Office

$5 OFF
Lunch or Dinner

15% Off
All Repairs!

$5 Off
Stylecut

FREE 6 lb. Pad w/
30yd Carpet Purchase

Oil - Snohomish County
Low Prices - Fill Now!

$1 off French Dip
$4.99 Burger Basket

20% Off Dinner
Up to $75 Value!

Lube, Oil & Filter
Buy 1 - Get 1 FREE

25% off Bath & Groom
New Customers
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT