Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009 5:51 am
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
The Buzz
Take a look under your seat
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Kennedy’s assassination remains a puzzling memory
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Arlington dreams big with teen center-skate park
Latest gallery

Opening Day at Stevens Pass
November 19. 2009 (10 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Nearly 30 kids adopted during annual event in S...
Gold Bar couple admit animal cruelty in puppy m...
Arlington area man's arrest in alleged burglar'...
Friday


Victim of alleged burglary now a suspect in kil...
Couple pleads guilty in Gold Bar puppy mill case
Nearly 2,000 turn out for Stevens Pass opening day
Thursday


Safety long a concern for road involved in fata...
State budget's $2 billion hole will require dee...
County considers building for disaster response...
Wednesday


Jury will decide accident or murder in girl's s...
Marysville rejects idea of a much later start f...
Flu’s full force shocks an Edmonds man an...
Tuesday


Year in jail for fired principal who kidnapped ...
State senator's ex-in-law threatened to kill hi...
$2 billion short, state will find tax talk hard...
Monday


Friends mourn 2 killed in Lynnwood crash
'No Child' law sees more students transferring ...
"Nutcracker" is link to family history for 6-ye...
Sunday
One-car wreck in Lynnwood kills two, injures tw...
Mountlake Terrace rejects medical marijuana dis...
Builders object to hearing examiner, but activi...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

Mark Mulligan / The Herald  (click to enlarge)
Chris Chase stands in trees that were cut down by a neighbor on his family’s property along Mukilteo Boulevard in Everett.
(click to enlarge)
Jute mats cover a landslide that resulted after several dozen trees were cut down and an irrigation pipe broke. The trees, on Chris Chase’s property, were cut down without his permission.
(click to enlarge)
Mark Mulligan / The Herald Jute mats cover a landslide area behind where Chris Chase walks across dead trees that were cut down by a neighbor on his family’s property along Mukilteo Boulevard in Everett.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Monday, November 9, 2009

Tree clearing, mud slide angers Everett neighbor

Neighbors cut trees on his property, which might have led to slide

EVERETT — Chris Chase was driving down Mukilteo Boulevard in June when he saw something that stopped him cold.

Someone had cut down dozens of trees on land his family has owned for three-quarters of a century. No one gave them permission.

The sight, Chase said, broke his heart.

Just above the scalped hillside: a million dollar house that now had an unobstructed view of Port Gardner.

A few weeks later, the same neighbor’s irrigation pipe ruptured and spilled hundreds of thousands of gallons of water on the hillside. A gargantuan chunk of earth came loose and rumbled down the gully above nearby Merrill & Ring Creek.

It’s not clear if a leak in that pipe, the removal of the trees or a combination of both events caused the landslide.

What is clear is Chase is angry, and not just with his neighbors.

Chase is the owner of Cottage Werks, of Everett, which specializes in building homes the company says are “environmentally friendly, low-impact.”

The Chase property is two parcels that equal 8 acres. It’s one of the few large tracts of undeveloped land along this stretch of Mukilteo Boulevard.

Chase’s grandfather, a family doctor, bought the land when few lived this far away from downtown. As a child, Chase and his brother spent countless hours playing among the maples. Now, a jute mat holds a barren patch of hillside like a gigantic Band-Aid. A jumbled mess of rusty brown tree limbs, mud and debris sits below.

The neighbors, Fredric and Holly Anderson, declined to comment.

In a prepared statement, their attorney, John Dippold, of Seattle, said the couple feels horrible about what happened.

The Andersons cut Chase’s trees accidentally while removing trees on their own property, Dippold said. The water leak was an unfortunate accident that could have happened to anyone, he said.

The city determined that the Andersons actually cut 38 trees on Chase’s property. The Andersons have never said who did the actual cutting.

“The Andersons have worked to try to remedy this problem and have committed more than $100,000 to try and find a solution,” Dippold wrote.

In a July 24 letter to the city, another attorney representing the Andersons said the trees were cut partly after pressure from Andersons’ neighbors.

“The Andersons live in a community with restrictive view covenants that require maintaining trees and landscaping in such a way that the views of their neighbors are unobstructed,” attorney Brice Howard wrote. “When the Andersons purchased their property, they were told by the previous owner and neighbors that the previous owner had cut trees on their property a number of times in the past.”

David Hall, an attorney for Everett, said the city is doing everything it can legally, and that includes considering filing criminal charges against the Andersons.

Everett police continue an investigation, and that case has been referred to the prosecutor’s office.

City staff have spent dozens of hours dealing with the situation, including fast-tracking a process that would shore up the hillside before the rainy season causes more damage, and encouraging Chase and the Andersons to sort out a solution.

“What we’ve done is far beyond what we normally do,” Hall said.

The city asked the Andersons to hire specialists to prepare a restoration plan and a geotechnical assessment. The city also fined the couple $38,000, then deferred it, keeping it on the books as a “place holder,” Hall said. Even without the fine, the couple will have to spend “a fair amount of money” to restore the Chase property, he said.

The Andersons have so far complied with those requirements, but Chase still isn’t satisfied.

He doesn’t believe the restoration plan goes far enough. The trees they want to plant on the hillside, for instance, include varieties that aren’t native to the gully and won’t grow as tall as the 60-foot Western red cedars and maples that were lost.

The city still needs to figure out what to do about a drain pipe that is running across his property, also without permission, he said.

And the retaining wall that’s part of the restoration plan doesn’t do much more than keep the Andersons’ pool from sliding down the hill, he said.

Chase is sore, too, because Everett brought in an outside attorney to start building a case to protect against any lawsuits he might lodge against the city.

“We understand why they are upset,” said Hall, the city attorney. “The property has value to them. That is very emotional. We have done everything we can and people still aren’t going to be satisfied.”

Debra Smith: 425-339-3197, dsmith@heraldnet.com.




READER COMMENTS
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
Tougher Penalties Needed
It really angers me that some land developers ignore land-clearing laws and the rights of others and accept the financial penalty simply as the cost of doing business - or the price they have to pay to get what they want. Tougher financial penalties are needed to ensure that the cost does not outweigh the benefit of breaking the laws - and a stiff prison sentence wouldn't hurt either.
Noel VanSpoor | Nov 16, 2009 10:25 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Recycle the trees
"Accidentally" cut down 38 trees??? Yeah, right.
I hope Mr Chase can recycle these trees and use them in some of his building projects.

Elle None | Nov 10, 2009 4:46 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
(No heading)
The trees that were cut were not the type that grow back quickly. The trees were cut to the stump, effectively killing the tree completely, especially on conifers. IF the clearing was done by a professional, it was shoddy work. There are many options besides clear cutting a hillside. View windows, limbing, etc. can provide good views while maintaining slope stability. By cutting all of the trees to the stump, they created a situation where the irrigation rupture would cause excessive erosion. There may have been some erosion when it ruptured, but not as much as they currently have. It takes 25 years for a forest to mature enough to properly handle water in a manner that is beneficial to the forest. If it wasnt an irrigation line, it would have been the wet season this year. The Andersons are typical, do what they want, pay the fines later property owners. There are many instances where neighbors tresspass and damage private property to get the views they want and feign ignorance. They paid a guy with a chainsaw, pointed at the trees that were blocking their view and didnt think about consequences. I hope they are fined and are forced to replace the trees on the hillside by fast growing, tall trees that block their view.
Ryan Williams | Nov 10, 2009 10:10 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Cottage Werks
Have you seen the homes he builds in places no house should be built? He cuts out of wooded areas in steep areas and has ruined places with trees that no one else would build on. The homes are not even attractive and usually create a traffic hazard where the driveways meet the streets on blind curves. Also, have you seen where the trees were cut? Those trees have been cut periodically for years. They grow back quickly. Not good they cut his trees but really, the slide was from the water leak.
Rae Cook | Nov 10, 2009 6:13 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Illegal Tree Cutting and Trepassing
Anderson's spent $100,000. working diligently with the CITY to benefit them. Have the worked with the actual property owners, The Chases???? No, they have not. The $$$ is for a wall that will give them an unobstructed view from their pool of the water. The wall does not resolve drainage issues onto the Chase's property or any type of restoration of trees. And that's the truth.
sarah dunton | Nov 9, 2009 8:24 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
narcassists
One large tree I had cut down cost2500$ 38 times $2500.00=. $100,000.00 settlement that would be a steal for the Andersons. They got a million dollar veiw for a huge discount and taking anothers freedom.
steve drews | Nov 9, 2009 5:35 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Tree Cutters
What Slobs - but there is a remedy. Force them to replace every tree with mature trees of the same age and size - shouldn't cost more that $100k for each tree. We now are all aware that the Andersons "accidentally" took their neighbor's trees. Sort of like accidentally shoplifting. They should be shunned as well as sued. I remember a buyer of mine years ago who said, "what's the worst they could do if I cut their trees?" I told him in graphic detail. The county has fines for people who cut large trees without a permit - sock it to these thoughtless dunderheads.
c v trier | Nov 9, 2009 5:12 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
It makes you wonder....
What are these people thinking? They are definitely selfish. Just because they are rich, that means they can control everything around them. Now the Chase property is damaged and there might be future damage with mud slides or the like? What the heck? I am interested in keeping up on this. It really shows what our tax dollars are going for....hopefully to help us when these things happen. ?
Darci Wilson | Nov 9, 2009 1:59 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
What's A Millionaire to do.
What a Bunch of Losers!!!!!!!!!!!! twisted
Johhnny Rotten | Nov 9, 2009 11:18 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Accidentally cut down 38 trees?
That's a pretty big "accident". It seems to be part of a trend I've noticed with people with big bucks which is to do whatever they want and pay the fines later. That way you have your unobstructed view even though you didn't pay for that when you purchased the house. There is a company that sells "big trees". I hope Mr. Chase can have them plant 38 big trees - it may help stabilize the hillside, and may cost enought to at least discourage this particular pair from following the ruin it now, pay later philosophy.
T G | Nov 9, 2009 5:25 am | 1 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Pay Up!
Open your wallet and start paying, regardless of the cost they need to spend whatever it takes to return the property to as close as they can. Or to a point that satisfies the Chases. Accident???? Fricken ridiculous!
Gary Beane | Nov 9, 2009 10:44 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Stupid.
You have millionaires fighting over million-dollar views for their million-dollar mansions.

No wonder the Spend-ocrats want to tax them to pay for a National healthcare program.

Stories like this make me want to reconsider my position.

Kelly Nichols | Nov 9, 2009 8:57 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Trees
If you want to understand why Chase is upset, you should take a look at what he has built. Most developers clear land to optimize the development area. Chase has built some pretty attractive homes that fit very nicely into the surrounding environment. If that is what he had in mind for this property, than I can really understand why he is heartbroken.
Mark Reichlin | Nov 9, 2009 7:41 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
Go ahead and litigate
This doesn't look like an accident to me. Look at the picture of the house. Million-dollar home needing a million-dollar view?...

And who runs pipes across another person's property?...

Peter in Maltby | Nov 9, 2009 5:53 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. Arlington area man's arrest in alleged burglar's killing a shock to many
2. Fire tips police to Lynnwood pot farm
3. Rural Snohomish County voters largely rejected Referendum 71
4. Nearly 30 kids adopted during annual event in Snohomish County
5. Gold Bar couple admit animal cruelty in puppy mill case
6. Whistlin' Dixie
7. Lynnwood: Man charged in brother's 'honor killing'
8. Boeing begins work on new 787 plant
9. More workers laid off in Snohomish County's planning department
10. Camano Island man accused of selling stolen diabetic supplies on eBay
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Eat local this Thanksgiving
Mavericks moving on
Canada's Great Big Sea rolls into Edmonds
A. Murphy finishes 2nd in volleyball
Art Walk features music, demonstrations
EAT LOCAL: Getting the goods
Lynnwood HS history teacher Vic Bennet dies
Wildcats head to semis
CSO Chamber annual show slated Nov. 23
The Enterprise Online Newspaper


25% off Bath & Groom
New Customers

Lube, Oil & Filter
Buy 1 - Get 1 FREE

15% Off
All Repairs!

20% Off Dinner
Up to $75 Value!

FREE 6 lb. Pad w/
30yd Carpet Purchase

$2 OFF
at Box Office

$5 OFF
Lunch or Dinner

$5 Off
Stylecut

Oil - Snohomish County
Low Prices - Fill Now!

$1 off French Dip
$4.99 Burger Basket
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT