|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| CONTACT THE HERALD |
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com |
| |
Published: Sunday, November 29, 2009
Tested at work, but not at school
By James McCusker
The health care reform legislation now moving to debate in the U.S. Senate contains a lot of changes some good, some not so good, and some best described as highly imaginative.
One thing that is not being changed, though, is the focus on the workplace as the center of gravity for medical insurance.
The importance of the workplace to this system will, hopefully, ensure continued interest in the preparation of young people for their adult lives, including work. For without access to the workplace, few Americans will enjoy the benefits of this health care reform effort.
The subject of preparing our youth appeared in two news stories that popped up within a space of 48 hours recently, one from each side of the continent.
The first story was from Olympia, where the superintendent of public instruction announced a plan to delay any math and science test requirements for high school graduation for six or eight years or so, essentially abandoning them.
The second story dealt with the tutoring industry that has arisen in New York City to give 3- and 4-year-olds an edge in taking the entrance exams that the elite kindergartens now require.
Both stories are evidence of how good ideas can be transformed into absolute silliness. Still, they are also illustrations of very different approaches to educational preparedness and achievement. If you had to guess, which kids would you bet your money on? Would it be the ones who were being overprepared for the challenges of todays world by constant testing or the ones immersed in an educational system of whatever, where standardized testing was being jettisoned?
They are both extremes, and unattractive alternatives, but there is little doubt that the world, especially the workplace world of making a living, is full of challenges and daily tests. We may not like it, but that is the way it is, and we arent doing our kids any favors by failing to prepare them for it.
In our economy, high employment levels require two things: economic growth that generates a demand for work; and individuals in the population who have the skills to perform that work and are available to do it.
Recession-level unemployment takes care of the availability part of the equation, but skills are a potential problem. As the economy recovers, there is little doubt that it will generate a demand for work. How many people will end up employed because of that demand is another matter.
Workers are not like commodities, interchangeable, like potatoes stored in 125-190 pound sacks ready to meet the demand when it shows up. Instead, each of us is different. And these differences become more important with each technological shift of the economy.
Anyone who has ever looked for a job or who has ever tried to hire a worker knows that the labor market is not at all like the commodities market. In many ways, both the supply and demand sides of the job market are much more like the search for romance.
Whether you are looking for either a job or a date, there are few meaningful standards and even fewer effective guidelines despite the useless tips, an unending flood of books on the subject, and the incessant television ads for online matchmaking services.
The structures of the romance market and its corresponding matchmaking industry are both based on determining characteristics that both sides of the market have in common. Whether this is an effective route to a successful personal relationship remains an open question.
In the labor market, the structure is similar, but not identical. The commonality of a successful match there exists only when the supplier possesses identical skills and experience to those that the demander believes are required. In other words, if you cant operate a milling machine, write programs in SQL, or dont have the skills the employer needs at this time your relationship is going nowhere. It doesnt matter if you are a Taurus, like baseball and enjoy being caught in the rain; you wont get past the machine that reads your resume.
And that is the problem that some economists are seeing in the unemployment fallout from this recession. Each day that passes, our economy develops a demand for workers with higher proven that is, tested skills. And each day our educational system, on average, falls farther behind, leaving fewer people with the ability to find a match in the workplace. How is that going to work out for us?
James McCusker is a Bothell economist, educator and consultant. He also writes a monthly column for the Snohomish County Business Journal.
|
COMMENTS | Be the first to comment
Log in or register to post a new comment.
To read other terms and conditions, click here