THE HERALD   EVERETT, WASHINGTON
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus
Welcome, Guest | Register | Sign In
 Home   Work        Follow Business_Herald on Twitter @Business_Herald   RSS feed RSS
Published: Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Toyota disputes study

The automaker says a test in which a Toyota engine was revved by short-circuiting wires could not happen under normal driving conditions.

  • A pedal with modifications performed by professor David Gilbert of Southern Illinois University is shown during a Webcast Monday at a Toyota facility in Torrance, Calif.

    Bret Hartman / Associated Press

    A pedal with modifications performed by professor David Gilbert of Southern Illinois University is shown during a Webcast Monday at a Toyota facility in Torrance, Calif.

  • Matthew Schwall, a Toyota managing engineer, speaks during a live Webcast Monday at Toyota’s headquarters for U.S. sales in Torrance, Calif. Toyota assembled a group of experts who said studies by an Illinois professor who revved Toyota engines by short-circuiting the wiring were flawed because they created conditions that would never happen on the road in normal driving circumstances.

    Bret Hartman / Associated Press

    Matthew Schwall, a Toyota managing engineer, speaks during a live Webcast Monday at Toyota’s headquarters for U.S. sales in Torrance, Calif. Toyota assembled a group of experts who said studies by an Illinois professor who revved Toyota engines by short-circuiting the wiring were flawed because they created conditions that would never happen on the road in normal driving circumstances.

WASHINGTON — Toyota, dogged by millions of recalls and claims that it still has not fixed its safety problems, took its strongest step yet Monday to silence critics who blame faulty electronics for runaway cars and trucks.

Toyota assembled a group of experts to refute studies by an Illinois professor who revved Toyota engines simply by short-circuiting the wiring. Toyota’s experts say the experiments were done under conditions that would never happen on the road.

The automaker maintained its assertion that simpler mechanical flaws, not electronics, were to blame. “There isn’t a ghost issue out there,” Kristen Tabar, an electronics general manager with Toyota’s technical center, told a news conference at the company’s North American headquarters in Torrance, Calif.

Meeting with reporters, Toyota addressed the work of David Gilbert, an automotive technology professor at Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, whose work has been the basis of doubts about Toyota’s mechanical fixes.

At least one outside expert said that even if Toyota’s criticisms are accurate, the professor’s work shows the systems that allow brakes to override stuck gas pedals can be compromised.

Toyota is mounting a public campaign to reassure its drivers about their safety and defending itself against critics who question the fix for 8 million recalled cars and trucks.

The company’s fix addresses gas pedal parts and floor mats that can cause the accelerator to become stuck in the depressed position. More than 60 Toyota owners who have had their cars repaired have complained the problem has persisted.

Toyota dealers have fixed more than 1 million vehicles. But the government has warned that if the remedy provided by Toyota does not properly address the problem, federal regulators could order the company to come up with another solution.

Gilbert told a congressional hearing Feb. 23 that he recreated sudden acceleration in a Toyota Tundra by short-circuiting the electronics behind the gas pedal — without triggering any trouble codes in the truck’s computer.

The trouble codes send the car’s computer into a fail-safe mode that allows the brake to override the gas. Gilbert called his findings a “startling discovery.”

House lawmakers seized on the testimony as evidence Toyota engineers missed a potential problem with the electronics that could have caused the unwanted acceleration.

But Monday, Chris Gerdes, director of Stanford University’s Center for Automotive Research, and a consulting firm, Exponent Inc., rejected the professor’s findings.

Toyota’s assembled experts said the professor’s experiments could not be recreated on the actual road. For example, they said, Gilbert had shaved away insulation on wiring and connected wires that would not normally touch each other.

“There is no evidence that I’ve seen to indicate that this situation is happening at all in the real world,” Gerdes said. He added that the professor’s work “could result in misguided policy and unwarranted fear.”

To prove their point, Toyota officials revved the engines of cars made by competitors, including a Subaru Forester and a Ford Fusion, by connecting a circuit rigged up to the wiring of the gas pedals.

Toyota supports other research programs at Stanford’s engineering school and is an affiliate of the Center for Automotive Research, but Gerdes said he came to his conclusions “with complete independence.”

Gilbert did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

Story tags » 

ResearchToyotaRecalls
Comments


NORTHSOUND ClassifiedsNORTHSOUND Classifieds
Top Jobs
Homes
Autos

HeraldNet highlights

Cougar goes grudgingly
Cougar goes grudgingly: Found near Arlington, cougar is caught and released (gallery)
Student returns to cheers
Student returns to cheers: Nic Trout makes first visit to M-P since he was paralyzed
Graduation rates
Graduation rates: Which schools are graduating kids on time? Look them up
Growing spuds above ground
Growing spuds above ground: Containers make potatoes a snap to grow