The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
In our view / 'Pink slime' controversy


Unappetizing priorities

The ongoing "pink slime" chronicles are another example of how the sheer size of our country works against producing food that is nutritious and appetizing.
No one can be opposed to the National School Lunch Program, which seeks to provide nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to children each school day. It provided lunches to more than 31 million children each school day in 2010.
Given such numbers, it's understandable that cost is at the forefront of food purchasing. Schools serving low-income students do what they can with what they can afford, which is often what no one would choose if they had a choice.
The "pink slime," or lean finely textured ground beef filler, has been around for awhile, most notably in the lunch program. But now that lists are out naming grocery stores that sell it, people are taking notice.
Where was the outrage in 2009 when USA Today, in a series on the safety of the National School Lunch Program, reported that the government, in an effort to help egg producers, spent more than $145 million on spent-hen meat for schools from 2001 through the first half of 2009? This amounted to more than 77 million pounds of spent-hen meat served in chicken patties and salads.
During its investigation, the paper found that the government provided the nation's schools with millions of pounds of beef and chicken that wouldn't meet the quality or safety standards of many fast-food restaurants.
Spent-hen meat is the meat from hens killed after their egg-laying prime.
But non-students didn't have to worry about the spent-hen meat, since it doesn't meet the safety standards of many fast-food restaurants, USA reported. Campbell Soup stopped using it more than 10 years ago because of "quality considerations." It is otherwise used in pet food and compost.
While it's reassuring that Washington schools don't appear to be among those serving the "lean finely textured beef," it's not right that any state and/or school be forced to serve questionable choices just because it's what affordable.
The USDA doesn't exist to help egg producers or beef suppliers sell their goods, or defend their practices, yet it seems to do just that. Despite USA Today's findings, the USDA insisted the meat it buys for the lunch program "meets or exceeds standards in commercial products."
In February, Herald reporter Sharon Salyer wrote about how local school districts are improving their lunch offerings by partnering with local farmers and other suppliers, which is extremely encouraging news.
Most problems are best solved on the local level -- including how to best purchase and serve nutritious food to students.

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

Looking for a friend?
Looking for a friend?: Animals up for adoption at the Everett shelter (7 new photos)
A haircut for a dollar?
A haircut for a dollar?: At Everett barber school, it'll only cost you a hair
What's your number?
What's your number?: Find out what your Seahawks jersey says about you
Cooking for kickoff
Cooking for kickoff: Football-themed recipes for your Super Bowl crowd
SnoCoSocial