The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Anti-Wi-Fi lawsuit suffers major setback

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
Associated Press
Published:
SANTA FE, N.M. -- A New Mexico anti-Wi-Fi activist who claims that his neighbor's wireless service caused him physical harm may have lost his final round in court.
The Santa Fe New Mexican reports that a state judge ruled Tuesday that no scientific study has yet proved that electromagnetic stimulus adversely impacts personal health.
The ruling dealt an apparent lethal blow to a lawsuit filed by Santa Fe resident Arthur Firstenberg, who has long argued that electromagnetic radiation emitted by cellphones, smartphones, wireless routers and other apparatus can cause illness.
In January 2010, Firstenberg sued his neighbor, Raphaela Monribot, for $1 million over the use of such electronic equipment at Monribot's Santa Fe home.
Monribot's attorney, Joseph Romero, said the judge's ruling may set a precedent for similar Wi-Fi court cases.

Information from: The Santa Fe New Mexican.
Story tags » LawsComputers & Information Technology

More Nation & World Headlines

NEWSLETTER

HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus