The files involved in the case included a recommendation for a special sentencing program and a statement made by a victim. Thurston County prosecutors had argued that the files were investigative records and should not be disclosed to the public.
In their 6-3 decision, justices said neither of the records were part of the actual investigation into criminal activity. They said it is not enough that a prosecutor simply considered a document or even that the document may be useful in making a sentencing recommendation to the courts.
"Neither of these records is part of an investigation into criminal activity or an allegation of malfeasance," wrote Chief Justice Barbara A. Madsen in the majority opinion.
The ruling reversed a Court of Appeals decision that had determined the victim statement was exempt from disclosure but the sentencing recommendation was not.
Justice Tom Chambers wrote in dissent that the documents contained deeply personal information and that the public's interest in the files is minimal. He called on the Legislature to establish more protections to prevent the release of sensitive information.
"I do not believe the people or the Legislature intended that the most sensitive information of victims of a crime, especially a sex crime, should be revealed to newspapers and the public, causing victims to be victimized all over again," Chambers wrote.
More Northwest Headlines
State lawmakers take education reform ideas on the road Pastor’s sermon: ‘Violence will not have the last word’ Oregon National Guard unit prepares for Kuwait deployment Medical Lake couple injured in northern Idaho crash Court vacates woman’s sentence in lottery theft case High school football player seriously injured in game Seattle plans expansion of bike share network Three-legged raccoon’s home safe at Port of Seattle
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.