The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

State justices limit investigative records rule

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By Mike Baker
Associated Press
OLYMPIA -- Washington's Supreme Court determined Thursday that prosecutors improperly withheld documents in a sex offender case, as justices took a narrow view of a state law that allows officials to keep investigative records from the public.
The files involved in the case included a recommendation for a special sentencing program and a statement made by a victim. Thurston County prosecutors had argued that the files were investigative records and should not be disclosed to the public.
In their 6-3 decision, justices said neither of the records were part of the actual investigation into criminal activity. They said it is not enough that a prosecutor simply considered a document or even that the document may be useful in making a sentencing recommendation to the courts.
"Neither of these records is part of an investigation into criminal activity or an allegation of malfeasance," wrote Chief Justice Barbara A. Madsen in the majority opinion.
The ruling reversed a Court of Appeals decision that had determined the victim statement was exempt from disclosure but the sentencing recommendation was not.
Justice Tom Chambers wrote in dissent that the documents contained deeply personal information and that the public's interest in the files is minimal. He called on the Legislature to establish more protections to prevent the release of sensitive information.
"I do not believe the people or the Legislature intended that the most sensitive information of victims of a crime, especially a sex crime, should be revealed to newspapers and the public, causing victims to be victimized all over again," Chambers wrote.
Story tags » State Supreme Court

More Northwest Headlines


HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates


Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus