The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar

Splash! Summer guide

HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Friday, November 9, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

Predictions by pundits who got election wrong

  • Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney concedes the race to President Barack Obama in Boston on Wednesday.

    Stephan Savoia / Associated Press

    Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney concedes the race to President Barack Obama in Boston on Wednesday.

Elections make fools of pundits and prognosticators (although some might have been that way before the vote). In any case, no, thank you, experts and geniuses, for the following utterances made in the days and weeks before President Obama was reelected Tuesday by 303 to 206 in the Electoral College (and maybe with Florida's 29 votes, too). Compiled as a public service by The Post's Paul Farhi:
"It comes down to numbers. And in the final days of this presidential race, from polling data to early voting, they favor Mitt Romney."
GOP strategist Karl Rove, in the Wall Street Journal, Oct. 31.
New York Times polling blogger "Nate Silver says there's a 73.6 percent chance that the president's going to win. Anybody that thinks this race is anything but a tossup right now is such an ideologue that they should be kept away from typewriters . . . because they're jokes."
Joe Scarborough, on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Oct. 29.
"By my reckoning, Gov. Romney will win ... Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia, plus either New Hampshire and/or Iowa for 270 to 276 electoral votes."
University of Maryland professor Peter Morici, Tuesday morning, to e-mail subscribers (Romney won only North Carolina).
"I believe the minimum result will be 53-47 percent Romney, over 300 electoral votes, and the Republicans will pick up the Senate. I base that just on just years and years of experience."
Newt Gingrich on Fox News, Oct. 25
"Mitt Romney will win big tonight. ... Despite intense efforts, Obama will lose both Ohio and Pennsylvania. ... One of the big Wednesday morning stories will be why most of the polls didn't have this right."
Former GOP candidate Steve Forbes, on Forbes.com, Tuesday.
"But frankly, my view, Greta, is that Romney is going to win this election by more than five points and that he's going to get north of 320 electoral votes."
Former Bill Clinton pollster Dick Morris, to Fox News's Greta van Susteren, Oct. 26.
"I'm predicting a 5 to 7 point popular vote victory for Romney. Electorally it won't even be that close. Romney will win many states that went to Obama in 2008. I'm predicting Romney victories in Ohio, Florida, Colorado, Virginia, Iowa, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Indiana. I predict a Romney victory by 100 to 120 electoral votes."
Las Vegas oddsmaker Wayne Allyn Root, in a Foxnews.com column, Oct. 9 (of the states listed, Romney won only North Carolina and Indiana and is losing in Florida).
"Furthermore, in battleground states, the edge in early and absentee vote turnout that propelled Democrats to victory in 2008 has clearly been eroded, cut in half according to a Republican National Committee summary." Rove, WSJ, Oct. 31.
"In addition to the data, the anecdotal and intangible evidence -- from crowd sizes to each side's closing arguments -- give the sense that the odds favor Mr. Romney. They do. My prediction: Sometime after the cock crows on the morning of Nov. 7, Mitt Romney will be declared America's 45th president. Let's call it 51 percent 48 percent, with Mr. Romney carrying at least 279 Electoral College votes, probably more." Rove, WSJ, Oct. 31.
"George Will's Electoral vote pick: Obama 217. Romney: 321." Added Will: "I'm projecting Minnesota to go for Romney." (It didn't.)
Washington Post columnist Will, on ABC's "This Week," Sunday.
"I think this is premature. We've got a quarter of the vote. Now remember, here is the thing about Ohio. A third of the vote or more is cast early and is won overwhelmingly by the Democrats. It's counted first and then you count the Election Day, and the question is, by the time you finish counting the Election Day, does it overcome that early advantage that Democrats have built up in early voting, particularly in Cuyahoga County? ... Even if they have made the call on the basis of select precincts, I'd be very cautious about intruding in this process."
Rove, on election night, disputing Fox News' decision to call Ohio, and the election, for Obama.
"You know, after the election, either I'm going to have to go through a big reckoning or people who think I'm wrong are. And you know what? They are." Morris, on Fox News, Sunday.
Story tags » National

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

HeraldNet highlights

Labor of love
Labor of love: Volunteer crews work hard to maintain Pacific Crest Trail
Good times in Snohomish
Good times in Snohomish: Kla Ha Ya Days full of fun (gallery)
Humoody's Way
Humoody's Way: Blinded at 2, Snohomish boy lives with no holds barred
Northern sights
Northern sights: 3 ways to sample the wonders of the N. Cascades (video)