Obviously, the city, which had a two-year warning that the bricks were incompatible with the plaza design, did not want any public knowledge of or input into their decision to prioritize the plaza layout over the past promises to the community. (And, by the way, I am very supportive of the plaza.) They may state that the Brick Campaign was not an official city project, but each donor did receive a certificate, signed by Mayor Pete Kinch, stating that the bricks were "permanently installed in the Community Theatre Plaza." Furthermore, the certificate displays the official city seal. And, once the mayor signed the certificate, the city became involved, maybe not legally, but in the minds of donors like me.
I have sent emails to several people in the city: They have either not been answered at all or they have made unfulfilled promises to provide me with more information. And because of this silence, I spoke out before the City Council on Nov 14. After my presentation, a weak response was forthcoming, as city officials tried to convince the room about their sincerity in seeking a solution to the dilemma: how to honor the brick donors within the parameters of the new Everett plaza development. And, yet they seemed to miss the entire point of my argument. I was not implying that the bricks could be saved (I am not knowledgeable enough for that decision), but I was discussing the poor approach taken by the city throughout the two years in which they foresaw the inevitable day in which the bricks would have to go. Simply, the city failed to answer the following:
1. Why didn't they use a variety of media to locate the donors and/or donor list, such as Channel 21, the city website, KSER, the Herald, etc.?
2. Why didn't they at least have an announcement in the newspaper and on their website at the time the bricks were actually being removed?
3. Why didn't they discuss the brick removal with the Herald reporter during her personal tour of the new plaza?
4. Why didn't they state that the donors will now be involved, going forward, with any replacement options and with the future grand opening of the new tribute?
5. Is the city going to send any formal letter to the donors, now that they have access to the list?
6. Why was I told that the city website had several "press releases" on the issue, when in fact there were no such releases? And thereafter, one city official said, "I guess I didn't get around to them." The only notice to the public was a cryptic memo given to the Performing Arts box office.
7. Why were they hiding the actual demolition activity, performing the deed in secrecy and behind a construction fence?
Inquiring minds are still waiting for more answers.
Aileen M. Langhans lives in North Everett.
More Commentary Headlines
NLRB decision: What's the definition of employer? Worker safety at dairies needs the Legislature’s attention Pope Francis makes it an exciting time to be Catholic County should look at why farms are struggling Demand that officials make streets safe State’s low tax rank is not helping children Give teachers greater role in deciding how to teach A climate solution GOP can advance
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.