This bizarre reality is thanks to the 1986 Electronic Privacy Communications Act, a law written before anyone dreamed that Americans would send, receive and store so much private information over third-party services such as Gmail or would draft documents using cloud computing that they intend to keep confidential. Now Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Judiciary Committee and the 1986 law's original author, wants to amend it into the 21st century.
Mr. Leahy is set to press his committee Thursday to adopt a series of changes that would establish the confidentiality of email and other electronic communications. Service providers would be prohibited from handing over email, and Mr. Leahy would get rid of the strange 180-day rule that the government can now use to compel disclosure. To access any email content, law enforcement officers would be required to obtain a search warrant from a judge after demonstrating probable cause. The amendments would also oblige officials to give those whose email they are reading a copy of the search warrant. This would bring the law in line with the reality that Americans are using electronic communications services to exchange and store all sorts of sensitive data. Many journalists rely on the cloud to transmit and store their work; the Newspaper Association of America, to which The Post belongs, is part of the Digital Due Process Coalition, which is lobbying for Mr. Leahy's amendments.
There is always a trade-off between protecting Americans' privacy and empowering law-enforcement officers to fight crime. But the choice is not difficult in this case. A letter to the Judiciary Committee from former federal, state and local prosecutors notes that the amendments would clarify the rules under which law-enforcement officials operate while maintaining essential exceptions -- for example, in emergency situations such as kidnappings. In fact, the amendments would arguably not go far enough since they would still allow police to monitor some information, though not the content of digital documents, without a warrant -- records regarding the time spent using electronic services, certain payment records and other information that service providers collect.
Still, Mr. Leahy's amendments are worthy of enthusiastic support from his colleagues. They are already too long in coming.
This editorial appeared in Thursday's Washington Post.
More Commentary Headlines
We can all agree on gun safety How will Donald Trump affect the 2016 presidential election? Why no arrests in death at jail? What do so many Americans see in Trump? Sandra Bland should not have died in jail, nor been there Protect access to health care Self-imposed austerity can aid Greece as it did WWII-era U.S. For good and bad, U.S. tourism will change Cuba
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.