The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

What is this Notre Dame you speak of?

After dominating college football again, the SEC may be deserving of both spots in the national title game

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By Chris Dufresne
Los Angeles Times
No one down here in Southeastern Conference country was surprised Sunday when the final Bowl Championship Series standings confirmed Alabama would be playing Jan. 7 for the national title.
The surprise is why the SEC isn't playing the SEC again, just like last season.
"Do you think Florida deserves to play for the national title more than Notre Dame?" someone actually asked Alabama Coach Nick Saban on Saturday after his team clinched the SEC with a 32-28 win over Georgia.
Saban did not answer "no."
Covering the SEC title game truly is like entering another dimension of sound, another dimension of sight and another dimension of barbecue.
The way Las Vegas casinos have no clocks, the SEC basically seals off communication from the outside world. There are no press box updates for "other" games around the country.
It took the manager at the hotel bar Friday night 15 minutes to find the Pac-12 Conference title game among his numerous satellite channels.
Him: "What channel is that on?"
Us: "Um, Fox."
The SEC is fabulous fun and top-notch football with the inferences clear: there are no other conferences and there is no other world.
The SEC has won six consecutive BCS titles and the only priority is to win No. 7.
The opponent, unless it's another SEC team, is really secondary.
What is this "Notre Dame" you speak of? Is it an FBS school? How long has it been playing football?
"I don't know a whole bunch about Notre Dame, but I look forward to this game," Alabama guard Anthony Steen said.
It was almost like he was asked about facing Montana State.
You can understand the younger crowd not keeping up with a program that hasn't won a national title since 1988.
Older Alabama fans must know that Notre Dame leads the all-time series, 5-1, and that Bear Bryant was winless in four tries against the Fighting Irish.
When the subject came up, Bryant liked to mention that it was far more important to beat that "cow college" over at Auburn.
Sunday's formal announcement capped another bizarre, if not extraordinary, season for the BCS.
The system that can't shoot straight burped out an epic title game matchup between Notre Dame and Alabama, which should blow all BCS television ratings from here to the Krakatoa Bowl.
The BCS system also hiccuped the headline of Northern Illinois "busting" the BCS and earning an Orange Bowl bid.
This was fantastic, even if those little non-AQs from the Mid-American Conference did knock Oklahoma out of the BCS (aw, shucks).
The Rose Bowl got saddled with Stanford against Wisconsin (8-5), the only non-10-game winner among major bowl award recipients.
Wisconsin, coming off a crushing 70-31 win over Nebraska, should at least be highly motivated after losing in each of the last two Rose Bowl games.
Kansas State versus Oregon in the Fiesta Bowl on Jan. 3 is a tremendous matchup of schools that were No. 1 and No. 2 in the BCS until that one Saturday night last month.
The Sugar Bowl gets at-large anchor Florida against Louisville, which had to slide over from the Orange Bowl after "That Team" from Illinois crashed the party.
The Orange bites the BCS bullet with the least attractive bowl matchup, but the trade-off is playing host to Notre Dame-Alabama.
The moral of this year's story, as the BCS moves hours closer to extinction, is the SEC rules and always deserves a spot in everything.
Ponder: Oregon and Alabama basically have the same loss this year against top-10, two-loss teams.
Oregon lost at home to Stanford in overtime and Alabama lost at home to Texas A&M.
Stanford is ranked higher, No. 6 versus No. 9, in the BCS standings.
Alabama, naturally, deserves the spot this time because it won the SEC title and Oregon didn't even win its own division of the Pac-12.
Last season, Alabama deserved the title spot even though it didn't win its own division and Oklahoma State won the Big 12 Conference.
Oregon finished fourth in this season's BCS standings.
The system isn't rigged for the SEC, the conference simply has more ping-pong balls in the lottery hopper.
The league parlays unquestioned talent, passion and creative scheduling to keep enough schools in the top 10 to almost always win the end-game discussions.
The SEC finished with six teams in the BCS top 10.
How can you even argue Oregon over Alabama?
The SEC has sneaked and lucked into plenty of BCS title games and justified every one by winning.
A four-team playoff is coming in 2014, although this season it would have a tough time resolving the omission of Kansas State and the choice between Oregon and Pac-12 champion Stanford, which beat Oregon.
The question we ask is why the SEC would ever want to break up the BCS?
Story tags » College Football

More Sports Headlines


Sports headlines

Top sports stories delivered daily


Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus