The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Friday, December 21, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Kimberly-Clark site


Water-dependent industry only

City of Everett Councilwoman Brenda Stonecipher conveniently wrote a biased commentary with regard to how citizens of Everett, aka "herself" would like to see the Kimberly-Clark property be used in the future. (Sunday Viewpoints, "What is the right use for old mill site?")
Brenda does acknowledge that there are four alternatives, coming before the City Council, for a decision on land use at this site. She fails to mention that she is one of the council members, forgoing the irony and on with her sales pitch, using assumed figures of employment and tax revenue. It does not consider the tens of thousands of jobs that international trade and shipping support in aerospace. Do not limit our region's ability to support foreign trade.
After reading her article, I assume she has little to no experience with heavy industrial waterfront property.
The Kimberly-Clark site boarders the Port of Everett, Naval Station Everett, and BNSF Railroad. Anything but cargo handling and water-dependent heavy industry would be a waste of extremely unique resources; the deep water frontage and the multiple rail lines.
Light manufacturing and non-water-dependent industry can of course be located relatively anywhere, hence the term "non-water dependent." Why on earth would you try to convince the citizens of Everett that an extremely unique waterfront property should be the site of an run of the mill, nobody yet interested, very expensive business park.
Is a park bench worth risking a working waterfront?
Nick Hoekendorf
Everett
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

Lofty potential for drones
Lofty potential for drones: Aircraft could be used in real estate, other businesses
A community of kindness
A community of kindness: Seahawks home a display of affection for couple's daughter
Looking for a friend?
Looking for a friend?: Animals up for adoption at the Everett shelter (7 new photos)
Super snacks
Super snacks: Best finger-food recipes to make for the big game
SnoCoSocial