The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Friday, December 28, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Preventing harm


Is 'safety' really the core concern?

The tragedy in Newtown, Conn., ruined Christmas for many of us. The moral outrage expressed by so many people is justified. There is a groundswell to enact legislation to restrict certain classes of firearms. That action may be warranted. I share that concern and support that action.
However, I question if safety is really the driving force for the call to restrict firearm ownership. There is another mechanical device in our everyday life that destroys more lives and kills more children than firearms -- automobiles. I see no call for national laws either to restrict the speed of cars, or to severely punish, aggressive drivers, drunk drivers, and repeat offenders. No, cars are a part of the fabric of our lives, even though automobile ownership has not been interpreted by the courts as a constitutional right as has been decided about firearms.
I know the argument that substance abuse is a disease, and should be treated as such. But people still drive and still kill innocent people, including children. Surely nobody believes that a sane person would walk in to an elementary school and begin shooting. The disease argument by the NRA should not be debunked on one hand while decrying punishing crimes committed while the perpetrator is chemically incapacitated on the other.
It seems to me that response to ban firearms is a convenient device to pursue a philosophical agenda, rather than a response to protect children. If children's safety is the target, then we should develop and enforce laws to protect children, such as: child pornography, school bullying, human trafficking, child abuse, and raising children with no consequences for their actions and behaviors (which is a form a of abuse in my mind).
As I said at the beginning, I welcome a philosophical and legal debate regarding gun control, but why not try an honest approach. Coming so recently after all of the political ads, an honest debate and deliberate actions would be a welcome change.
Ed Caine
Mukilteo
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.